Second Amendment Advocate Killed!

In Maryland, one of our fifty states, a Second Amendment advocate, Gary Willis was shot and killed by police in his own home for refusing to give up his firearms. From the information gleaned out of a GunsAmerica Digest publication documenting the incident it appears the man identified as Gary J. Willis and his family were awakened at 0500 hrs. by loud knocking on his door. When Willis opened the door he was armed with a pistol and was met by at least two individuals who were armed and appeared to be law enforcement officers. Willis placed his pistol on a table as the officers entered his home. The two officers advised Willis that they had a court order to confiscate his firearms and were there to seize them. A struggle ensued between the officers and Willis. Willis reached for his gun and the weapon discharged. No one was injured.

While at least one officer continued to struggle with the Willis, the other officer shot and killed Willis. The reason for shooting Willis, the Second Amendment advocate? Willis had access to a gun and the pistol was previously discharged during the struggle. Now, having been in law enforcement for quite some time myself I can understand the need to separate Willis from his pistol and I'm not going to second guess the other officer regarding his response that resulted in Willis' death. There appeared to be a struggle between his partner and an armed individual, a shot was fired, the second officer responded with what he felt was the force necessary to neutralize the threat. In this case, lethal force.

I question the underlying reason for the officers being there in the first place. They're on site to prevent a United States citizen from exercising his Second Amendment rights via a poorly drafted, difficult to enforce "Red Flag Act" law that serves to water down and streamline laws already in place that make the forfeiture of our constitutional rights a government necessity... in the protection of the public. Yeah, right.

The reason for the confiscation order issued by the court? This whole "RED FLAG" ruse? A disgruntled close relative allegedly served as an affiant to the police, suggesting her relative, Gary J. Willis was a danger to society and needed to have his firearms removed from his realm of control via the "Red Flag Act". The very same "Red Flag" law that's being introduced throughout the states. Based on the "witness'" declaration local law enforcement received via the relative they subsequently obtained that fatal court order to seize the firearms of Gary J. Willis, the now deceased homeowner/second amendment advocate.

This "Red Flag Act" is coming to our neighborhoods sooner than you think unless we start demanding our government leave our constitutional rights alone! All it takes is one disgruntled family member or "close" friend or disgruntled neighbor to suggest we, those of us who are gun advocates, Second Amendment advocates pose a serious threat to society. The law will be used to separate us law abiding second amendment advocates from our second amendment rights.

Read the link provided in the text and take it from there. 1984, George Orwell, Machiavelli, Cloward-Piven? Call me a conspiracy theorist if you will but hey, I spent a long career in law enforcement and government. I wouldn't put anything past our liberal polticos these days.

Enforce the laws that are already in place! We don't need to nor should we create new ones to accommodate the politicos incessant need to "legislate" us.

We need to protect our constitutional rights!

IMHO

##

Peggy 6824's Comment

I'll keep my gibberish short. When I read "news" articles I also like to read the comments and sometimes I'll even interact with others in the comments sections. I recently read an article regarding the Houston Chronicle's biased, faux reporting and found this comment by Peggy6824, a reader of the article who commented on it. In short, she's matter of fact, articulate and, in my opinion she's spot on! I won't go into detail on this blog. Just click on the link above and read her comment in Disqus comments following the article. Or you can read what she had to say below... I copied and pasted it with her permission.

Peggy's comment:

peggy6824 Earnest Evanston • 2 days ago

"Absolutely!

It is Democrats a.k.a. "Social Justice Warriors" who are the ultimate hypocrites & racists who label minorities, both black & brown, like me losers at birth because of the color of our skin, as if stamped on our foreheads.

It is they who view us as “LESS THAN” in every imaginable way simply because of the color of our skin. We are less intelligent, less industrious, less ingenious, etc. & in doing so, it is they who seek to destroy us from birth.

It is they who will remind me, for the rest of my life, that I will forever be a victim of “white people”/“white privilege” & that they are responsible for any/all of my failures at any/every point in my life.

They will repeatedly remind me that I am entitled to welfare, food stamps, affirmative action, etc. & that I will always be entitled to a free college education & job whether I am qualified or not thanks to quotas because of the color of my skin rather than because of my intelligence, qualifications, abilities, & talent.

Truth be told, it is Democrats a.k.a. "Social Justice Warriors" who belittle, degrade, demoralize, insult, & victimize me on a daily basis!

While my parents pushed me to get a good education, work hard, & reach for the stars with regard to what I could accomplish in life, Democrats a.k.a. "Social Justice Warriors" were telling me that the best I could hope for was government dependence thus I was destined to live on the Democratic Poverty Plantation where the government determines your worth (based on what they dole out), where you can afford to live, & what you can afford to buy.

Tell me, what’s the difference between the Democratic Poverty Plantation & a Zoo????

Democrats a.k.a. “Social Justice Warriors” claiming to be the champions of the poor, middle class, American working families, & minorities like me promise equality via “redistribution of wealth” a.k.a. “Socialism” from those they refer to as the “greedy rich” while they themselves serve as the instrument of their destruction as they continue to bend over backwards to provide the “greedy rich” with the cheap labor/new customers (subsidized by our taxpayers) that they seek.

Theft, redistribution from others does not even begin to replace all that the Democrats a.k.a. “Social Justice Warriors” have stolen from me. It does not replace my honor, integrity, pride, self-respect, self confidence, etc. thus their idea of equality & mine differ.

In my opinion, it is simply a win-win for Democrats at the expense of others. Millions of loyal supporters (slaves) living on their Poverty Plantations, millions more from 3rd world nations they seek to add to the plantation, & the loyalty of the “greedy rich” who benefit most from the cheap labor (slaves) & new customers, subsidized by our own taxpayers, they seek.

Democrats are absolutely dividing our citizens based on race & pitting us against each other.

Without perpetual "victims", of their creation, there would be no need for Democrats a.k.a. "Social Justice Warriors"!

(We cannot educate others as long as we limit ourselves to posting our views on just one site when “Disqus” is available on numerous sites. No need to log in again on other sites.)

https://www.thewrap.com/houston-chronicle-retracts-8-stories-after-fraud-investigation-we-apologize-to-our-readers/


#

Thank you for your frank and accurate comment Peggy6824! And thank you for letting us share it.

The Continued Saga of The Houston Chronicle...

In case you missed it the Houston Chronicle was called out awhile ago regarding their obviously slanted, biased reporting of fake news. They initially denied the fake news allegations but in the end the evidence was overwhelmingly against them. In all fairness to the Chronicle they called in Pulitzer Prize winner David Wood to review the allegations made by the public against the Chronicle's Austin Bureau Chief, Mike Ward. The reviewing editor discovered that many of the Ward's "sources" didn't seem to exist anywhere on earth. Even though Ward's work suggested many of those "sources" who he claimed and declared in many of his articles he wrote were refutable sources that corroborated his extremely pro-left, biased reporting they weren't real sources after all. They were simply figments of his imagination. The Houston Chronicle's Austin Bureau Chief, Mike Ward was subsequently "let go" by the Chronicle.

Here's the article
, it's a good read if you like to read about how the left manipulates unsuspecting or sometimes willing "News Media" outlets.

This seems to be the continued biased left's way of insuring we're being spoon fed their liberal agenda. Hat's off to the Houston Chronicle readers for calling them out on their faux reporting. In short today's just another day in liberal frenzy land.

IMHO

#

And Then There's Alec!

I don't normally dedicate a post to those who lie, act out fictitious scenes and deceive for a living. I normally don't post about actors, actresses... thespians- those who are pampered and catered that live amongst us but, I can't help myself here. Alec Baldwin... yeah I know, I know... "Smart Alec" Baldwin... he's evidently a liar AND a fool. He was recently arrested for assault by NYPD. Of course, Baldwin not only suggests no "assault" took place but he's chastising those in the press who would suggest such a thing. Even though he was detained, arrested and subsequently charged with assaulting a Boston Marathon bombing survivor for "taking his parking space" in a friggin' parking lot.

Yeah, the privileged... the Alec Baldwins of the world... they're fun to watch. The New York City Police Department did their part and arrested Baldwin now let's see what the New York City's judicial system will do to the prima donna. Will they charge him, will they try him in an open court, will the prosecutors agree to a plea, will the charge(s) be dismissed? It's going to be interesting. But then again anything "Baldwin" related is "interesting" in a sick, evil, self serving, privileged sort of way.

All I know is the victim of the assault (errr, "alleged" assault--wink-wink), 49 yrs. old Wojciech Cieszkowski is a survivor of the Boston Marathon bombing in 2013 and he seems to be pretty credible. He just wanted to park his car. Evidently Baldwin had other ideas.

Or so it seems...

#

I Admit, I've Been Hiding...

Well, at least I've been away from the blog for a couple of months. My Bad! I come here for no other reason but to simply release some pent up tension. Okay... maybe to get a dig in at the libs and such too.

Either way, I've been trying to juggle a recent move, unpacking included. There's copious amounts of stuff to unpack and less space than before to put it in. It seems that when one goes through life one tends to accumulate "stuff" or "wealth" as my father used to call it. I find myself struggling to suggest that much of the "stuff" I've unpacked isn't "wealth" let alone usable for anything other than scrap iron or ground fill. Either way I'm almost unpacked and am in the process of settling in.

I had to do the move thing. I had to sell the house and move from that once sparsely populated "neighborhood" turned cramped development and return to a somewhat more laid back lifestyle with some pleasant, unfettered breathing room between me and my "neighbors". Things just weren't going all that well in that cramped neighborhood. I'm not a "homeowner's association" type of guy who will allow folks I don't even know tell me where, when and how I need to put or store my trash cans. I'm also not inclined to attend meetings to discuss why our HOA dues keep increasing each year while the HOA service continues to decrease. It's never ceased to amaze me how guv'ment finds the cracks in humanity, in life to seep through and contaminate a once fine environment with their Machiavellian ideas. Government is the ultimate, all consuming slime mold of humanity. Give them an inch and they'll eventually consume you, if you let them. Fortunately, I moved myself as their target. I'm no longer a part of that infestation, no longer their crop to consume.

Once we got somewhat settled (i.e. trucks unloaded and sorting through boxes at the "new" place) I took it upon myself to dig the trench for the Cat 6 and the Video Cable from the house to an unattached shop. It's up and running, I'm up and running and all things considered, LIFE's GOOD! Again...

...except for the State, National and Global politics. That crap's still alive and festering.

But now that thing's are starting to settle down on the "home front" I'm going to get around to the old blogging, brass collecting, reloading, plinking, placering life I was trying to stay on top of in that crowded suburbia of humanity known as a "neighborhood". I left some good neighbors behind but that's on them. They shared their angst with me as much as I shared mine with them. I remedied our problem.

Now, it's time to get back into the whole bass-ackwards politico scene. I did have to include a disclaimer re: comments to this blog because I had to remove a few over the past couple of weeks. There's no need for threats of violence on me or my family nor do I have any desire to "meet" anyone somewhere. We'll just leave things as they are. I'm here, I'm not going anywhere unless Google shuts me out like Yahell and Farcebook did over the years.

Anyways, I'm going to start throwing stuff on here again for craps, giggles and simply to share.

Enjoy!

##

Our Country's In Trouble...

Our beloved United States of America is in some serious trouble from within and globally. But then most of us already know that, many of us don't want to admit it. Every morning I wake up and read the local, state, national and international/global news I can't help but feel the angst, the overt disdain for our country, us, our government by everyone involved. I read then "news", the world's events more than I watch the idiot box. I'm not one to pull up a chair, pour myself a cup of coffee and turn on television just to watch and listen to the talking heads of newsrooms everywhere who ask questions of their guests then talk over the top of them when the guest(s) try to answer the questions. That's the entire liberal "news" staff of the world and most definitely it is or is quickly becoming the Hannity, Beck, O'Reilly, Ingraham and more standard operating procedures relating to "interviewing" and "discussions". Even Tucker Carlson's starting to do it...

When a "reporter", a "news caster", left or right asks a question I'd love to hear the answer given to the news media by the person they're posing the question to. The whole, unadulterated answer not the chopped up, mixed up exchange via a heated "he said, she said" shouting match between the "reporter" and the "guest".

Nah, instead of putting myself through that crap I'll jump online, I'll pull up a chair and I'll read as many different "news" sites and web sites as I can stand to read each morning to glean and subsequently cull out the information I'm seeking. And that reading includes the comments by fellow readers like myself who follow those online, in print "discussions". Besides, my hearing isn't the best these days so when I try to listen to two or more idiots trying to talk over one another on a "news debate" I shut the darned idiot box off in frustration. Back when I debated on the debate teams in High School and College I remember "Robert's Rules of Order" and remember having to conform to the local, district, state, national and international rules we were required to follow so as to ensure a fully informative, non-confrontational formal discussion. Conformance to those rules helped to established arguments for both sides from which the viewers/listeners could weigh out the facts presented, the relevant rebuttals and make a somewhat more educated decision or come to a more personally relevant conclusion relating to the topic(s) being discussed.

It was a rather simple practice that most anyone who was watching or listening could walk away at the end of the "debate/discussion" and more effectively form their own conclusion(s) regarding the topic(s) being discussed.

Either way, I'm thinking our country's in trouble. In BIG trouble. We've reduced ourselves (myself included) to name calling, finger pointing, slobber slathering mutants who have little or no respect for each other, let alone our true enemy(ies). Let there be no doubt that our nation, our mighty fine United States of America as we know it is in very, very deep trouble. I'm a product of the early 50's, raised in the 60's and became an adult in the 70's. I've seen changes, I've participated in effecting changes as well as resisting changes.

I've never seen it happening at this level with this intensity and with so much of it coming to us from the global community(ies).

We're being attacked globally. Not so much on our streets, in our own homes, etc. via guns, knives, bombs, chemicals and more but by the global elite, the press, the mercenary mobs, the dis-information campaigns forwarded by ALL politicos, partisan or not! They've recruited our neighbors, our enemies... they've even recruited us to do their dirty work for them. Many of those attacks, those "threats" have evolved past the "campaign" stages into whole blown programs, activities, cultural mutations are dumbing and numbing us down to the point where we're accepting the chaos as a normal day by day "fact of life".

Nah, I'm not proud of what we've evolved to nor am I looking forward to more of this "evolution of society" of sorts. But then again I probably won't have to worry about it much longer. I'll be hanging around for the next thirty years (maximum) but most likely the next ten or twenty years at best.

My whole intent of this particular "rant" of mine was to post links to sites and "information" I received in my emails over the past two days... but why? Why would I participate in sharing that information. It's more of a "dis-information" campaign being played out by others who seek dominance over us, over our lives. In essence wouldn't that be playing into the hands of those who wish to destroy us. Wouldn't that be sharing with you all of the information you might have or might not have yet received from those very same folks who sent it to me already? As I wrote this vent, this rant I decided in this last paragraph that I wasn't going to post the links. I'm just going to RANT.

This is my RANT for today.

IMHO
#

More Democrat Fraud!!!

And yet another New York fraud who's a front runner for a state legislative seat.

Julia Salazar... judging from her background that she's provided to the New York elections folks (and a multitude of other organizations) and a subsequent background check completed by outside sources of her personal and "professional" background that she provided to the state's demoncrat party and the elections board, it's evident she's not an "immigrant" per se. Well, let's rephrase that. SHE'S NOT AN IMMIGRANT. She's also NOT JEWISH, she was raised Catholic. And she's not several other things she's claimed to be to get her foot in the door via a state Senate seat.

Yet, she's the front runner for the demoncrats re: that particular district's senate position.

That just goes to remind us all... the demoncrats continue to fabricate, support and subsequently elect frauds for their critical State legislatures much like they most likely do for their national politicos.

Ya' gotta love politics... NOT!

Them Dems... they lie to themselves about themselves, they lie to each other about themselves... that's how they get ahead.

Yet their voters don't seem to care.

You can get the complete and well written expose story at Tablet Magazine's online site. It's a great and exposing read. Judging from what they dug up on this Salazar fraudster it should be damning to her and the demooncrats! But then again, it is the demoncrats we're discussing here. The expose of her fraudulent history just might elevate her to the top of the list of candidates within her party.

Yawn...

IMHO
#

Another Clinton Sex "Scandal" Critic Silenced?!

Is Investigative Journalist and ex-cop Jen Moore another one of the Clinton clan's "victims"? I mean, she had what appears to be rock solid information that suggests good ol' Bill Clinton and his clan had groomed and were using young boys (and girls but mostly boys) to entertain their "affluent" friends and those they wanted to impress or become friends with throughout the past couple of decades. The informant had information that he (and others) was sexually assaulted by Bill Clinton and pimped out at private sex parties attended by other D.C. elites.

In fact, she was a matter of hours from taking her (now adult) informant to the local D.C. police when she met her unfortunate and premature demise. She had a "seizure". A veteran cop turned investigative reporter and someone who was in good health died before she could get the informant to the police to tell his sides of the events that took place years ago. At least one of those informants, now 26 yrs. old and a victim of the alleged rapes was going to tell the police all about Bill Clinton's fetish for young boys... in particular Bill's alleged fetish for raping young boys and girls and offering them up as sex toys to those he and ol' hill wanted to "impress".

Now Jen Moore is dead, allegedly died of a "seizure" though she was reported to be in perfect health. The informant(s) are in protective custody but are really running scared and ol' slick willy and sick hillary are still walking the streets and breathing free air.

WHY?! Why aren't they in a 4x8 holding cell awaiting trial somewhere?!

We don't need anymore of this crap from them.


IMHO
#

Tajikistan Is Still An Evil Place!

ISIS, islam, "radical" islam... whatever you want to call that cult. It's alive and well in Tajikistan and several other areas throughout the globe. Unfortunately for Jay Austen and Lauren Goughegan part of the ISIS clan that's inhabiting Tajikistan met the two and slaughtered them for no other reason but to slaughter them. They were unarmed, innocent, unsuspecting, naive westerners.

And now they're dead and their families grieve.

The two idealists were slaughtered and ISIS claimed the "credit" for their murders. The cowards even posed for a picture afterwards. Don't think for a fleeting minute that our work's not done re: ISIS, ISIL... We have a lot more vermin to get rid of.

IMHO
#

Some Liberal vs Conservative Differences

I picked the following information up from the "comments" section of a website article I was reading relating to Chelsea Clinton's take on Roe V. Wade and the (hopefully pending) appointment of Justice Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court by our POTUS Donald J. Trump.

It seems Chelsea's not a fan of Kavanaugh. I am.

Here's the comment:

"Since abortion is a “right.”……Can we pass a Bill to have Liberals Pay For My Guns and ammo?
After all IT IS A RIGHT too!

Here’s the difference between a LIBERAL and a Conservative:

If a conservative doesn’t like guns, he doesn’t buy one.
If a liberal doesn’t like guns, he wants guns outlawed.
If a conservative is a vegetarian, he doesn’t eat meat.
If a liberal is a vegetarian, he wants meat products banned.
If a conservative is homosexual, he quietly leads his life.
If a liberal is homosexual, he demands legislated respect.
If a conservative is down-and-out, he tries to better his situation.
A liberal wants to know who is going to fix it for him.
If a conservative doesn’t like a talk show host, he switches channels.
Liberals want those they don’t like to be silenced.
If a conservative is a nonbeliever, he doesn’t go to church.
If a liberal is a nonbeliever he wants any mention of religion silenced, unless, of course, the religion is from another culture.
If a conservative needs health care he shops for it, or looks for a job that will provide it.
A liberal demands that the rest of us provide for it.
A conservative will read this and will forward it, so his friends can have a good laugh.
A liberal will read this and delete it, because she’s offended.”

I'm good to go with libs paying for my guns and ammo! Why wouldn't I be?!

This Clinton clan... they're quite the self serving sham aren't they!

IMHO
#

The Russian Collusion Connection!!!

Let there be no doubt there was most definitely Russian collusion during the periods leading up to and through the 2016 national election. It's been hyped by the left and has been exposed via fantastic sleuthing by folks who truly have nothing to lose either way, liberal or conservative.

All they wanted to do was get to the bottom of the allegations and determine whether or not there was any merit to the "collusion" claims. After a thorough, seemingly bi-partisan (though not wholly as a "team" of sorts) investigative process both the left AND the right agreed there was collusion with the Russians. Collusion that was specifically designed to affect the outcome of our national elections, especially the position of POTUS. Both sides determined collusion ran rampant. Both sides determined the POTUS outcome was the primary target of the collusion.

Now, finally... after nearly two years of investigation we can rest assured the Ruskies did interfere and seriously attempted to influence our republic's selection of a president and they ALMOST SUCCEEDED!

The Butcher Bitch of Benghazi was the Russkie's preferred candidate. Don't take my word for it, check out this very well written and substantiated, Investors Business Daily editorial I found on the Investors Business Daily editorial page.

Let there be no question... collusion occurred and our current POTUS, Donald J. Trump was not the preferred candidate, rather, he was the target of the collusion. Thank God he won!

Now, can we take this a to the next level and investigate, charge and prosecute all of those involved with this treasonous act? PLEASE!

IMHO
#

Migration... And The Left Wants Open Borders?!

Chain migration, immigration, migration, refugees... Call it what you want, it ain't working. At least not for the non-muslim nations of the world. Europe opened its arms to an invasion of muslim, mid-east, African, global "refugees" and migrants over the past several years and the migrants are asserting their laws, their rules, their culture and beginning to reap their "rewards" much to our European friends chagrin.

Europe is knee-jerking as a result of the impacts the massive "immigration" has caused to their respective countries via the seemingly "open borders" immigration.

Europe is just now catching on to the mess, the cancer they've created, encouraged and subsequently cultivated. They're trying desperately to catch up the the hordes of "immigrants", "refugees" who were invited into their respective countries and are now trashing the hell out of their respective countries, not to mention their respective cultures.

Nope. This "open borders, refugee, migration" thing was not a good idea. If the "refugees" are in need of assistance. If they're in genuine need of care and protection then I still suggest those who desire to help them have them "refugee" in place. Let's take our care to their shores, their soils, their locales.

Don't bring them to ours. If they want to migrate then they can migrate via the respective receiving, agreeing nation's immigration laws and procedures, not make shift, U.N. "approved/sanctioned/enforced" compulsive "immigration".

Remember, the United Nations... it's not our friend.

IMHO

Thanks to Daniel Pipes and the Middle East Forum for the linked information.

#

Muslims Cannot And Will Not Tolerate Non-Muslims!

It's not a part of their creed, their cultish code.

I was responding to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's public remarks to his nation regarding maintaining and enforcing Israel's Nation State Law and I stumbled upon this fantastic comment by Ibn O Rassooli in the "Comments" section that followed the article. I've read his comments before throughout the years and quite frankly, he hasn't wavered from his stance. I've also shared his thoughts and beliefs re: muslim's alleged "tolerance" towards non-muslims.

There is no true tolerance, no true recognition of any other faith, religion, belief by islam, muslims. Muslims cannot and will not co-exist with non-muslims, kuffar, infidels. They are not allowed to by their very code, their shitrea code.

Oh, an lest we forget islam is not a religion. It never was. Islam is a cult.

But heck, don't believe me. Take it from Ibn Q Rassooli! A far more learned individual regarding islam than I ever will be.

Here's the comment. Take the challenge...
−

Ibn Q Rassooli • a day ago

As I have repeatedly asserted, demonstrated and conclusively proved to those Israelis, Jews and others regarding the TRUE characteristics of Muslims, I repeat herein once more~

1. No Muslim can ever be BOTH a Good Muslim and a Loyal citizen among non Muslims/ Kuffar/ Infidels (just watch what is happening in every European country that invited Muslims)

2. Because Muslims follow Allah’s Sharia, every Muslim is automatically the Eternal and Mortal ENEMY of every human being who is NOT a Muslim (80% of current humanity)

3. Since Allah is NOT God (NOT the same as the God of the Bible), Islam is therefore NOT a Religion but a Cult belief system; the Cult of Muhammad.

4. There was NEVER a Palestinian state or a Palestinian people in the last 6000 years of recorded history prior to 1964.

5. Therefore it is pure illusion and utter stupidity to believe that the Muslim so called Arab 'citizens' of Israel can be LOYAL to a Jewish state no matter that they have MORE rights among Jews than among Muslims.

$100,000 says there is not a single human being on planet Earth who can prove me WRONG!
Any challengers willing to lose $100,000 when they fail?

IQ al Rassooli
Kafir & Proud!

It Looks Like Things Got Stormy for Stormy

Judging from the judge's latest decision it looks like the old slut Stephanie Clifford, aka: Stormy Daniels will be paying at least a thousand bucks a month to her estranged husband, her daughter's father Glendon Crain for child support, mortgage on the home they shared, car payments for a BMW and a Cadillac and a whole bunch more. Crain stands to get a bunch of other goodies from Clifford/Daniels as well and stands a chance to collect a bunch more money, reportedly up to 50% or more from her "lawsuit settlements" if/when Clifford/Daniels ever wins any lawsuits.

I guess choreographed, scripted, filmed and sold fornication and legal "extortion" of sorts does have it's price. Especially if you're played by the liberal media and politicos to the extent that Clifford/Daniels has been played. She loved the attention now she can reap the "rewards".

I can't even imagine what she was thinking when she thought she'd get full custody of her daughter. She has to be half baked. I mean, she's on the tail end (no pun intended) of her career, aging rapidly and becoming more of a public figure than that of the pubis adult entertainment specialist she's proven herself so adept to being. From what I've read, heard and seen things don't normally go well for aging sex performers later in life. But she does have an "Ace in the hole"... she's allegedly an aspiring "director" in the "adult entertainment" industry.

Either way, her "big bucks" gleaned from her "career" as a sex toy and her potential earnings from any lawsuits that just might be decided in her favor will be dis-proportionally shared with Glendon Crain, the father of their child in support of the child.

Stephanie Clifford/Stormy Daniels, consider yourself having been "Trumped".

She's just another tool used by the left and tossed to the curb. Karma... it happens.

IMHO
#

The Socialist's Future; The Democrat Party

The left, they're not even trying to hide their intentions now.

I couldn't pass up sharing a recent YouTube video regarding the future of the Demoncrat Party. It depicts the Democratic Party's nomination in New York's 14th Congressional district, the party's most recent Socialist star, candidate Alexandria Orcasio Cortez. You have to give it a viewing. It's one of the most revealing clips of Cortez that I've seen.


I came across it via one of my favorite reads, The Gateway Pundit. Here's a link to Gateway Pundit's post as well.


It would be fun if it wasn't real! Let's attribute Cortez's "election" as a NY Democrat congressional candidate to desperation by the leftist, socialist organization... the Democrats.

IMHO

#

In Case We Miss It...

Our world's going to end.

The United States will be surpassed by China regarding global influence, economy, military, etc. Time travel will be discovered and employed. The polar caps ARE going to melt sooner than later. Venus will become a paradise to us... new discoveries there, etc. Humans will one day breed with aliens which will pretty much ensure we'll live forever... well, at least until the whole universe gets destroyed.

Yeah, we have a whole helluva lot in store for us if we're inclined to believe what this particular now deceased psychic, Bulgarian Baba Vanga tells us. And oddly, she was right more often than not. Go figure.

Don't fret though. Don't run out and buy a bunch of party faves and booze to celebrate the new coming of whatever... Let's just see how her latest two predictions turn out and take it from there, shall we?

IMHO
#

Iran HAS Nuclear Weapons!!

But then again, that's nothing we really didn't know. In fact, our country was instrumental in ensuring Iran achieved their desire to create and posses nuclear warheads capable of destroying their neighbors, at least. That POSPOTUS obama provided them with the materials to make the nuclear devices before he left office. That, coupled with the fact that he sent them cargo plane loads of cold, hard, U.S. Dollars to help them in their endeavors to build up their arsenal should never go unmentioned. The whole world watched, and the whole world laughed... at us.

I copied this from The Gatestone Institute. It suggests that our current POTUS, Donald J. Trump isn't happy with the plan his predecessor, obama supported re: Iran and their efforts to create and/or obtain nuclear weapons. Our current POTUS wants some serious changes to the loosely crafted obama plan, much to the chagrin of the Iranians. It's apparent what the Iranians want "weapons grade" plutonium for. They want it so they can include it in their nuclear weapons program. I'll argue obama knew full well why they wanted it. He also knew full well they weren't going to shut down their research, their manufacture of those very weapons the rest of the world don't want to see them get possession of.

Nah, obama's not our friend. He never was, he never will be. He's a puppet of the left, a whore for the global elite and he's hellbent on destroying our very existence as we know it. But then again, most of those folks on the left are hellbent on destroying us, our republic as we know it.

From the article, "the sunset clauses must be cancelled, the IAEA must have freedom to inspect whatever it demands, and Iran's long-range missile capacity must be curtailed."

The bottom line? Iran now has nuclear weapons. So what are we going to do about it?!

Thanks to Malcolm Lowe's contribution to the Gatestone Institute for an excellent, revealing article. Now we have to follow up on what we've demanded, at least.

IMHO
#

Black Men Are 14% More Likely To Die By "Firearm Homicide" Than White Men

...Or so the statistics show. So where does the real "gun problem" lie? Is it the gun? The bullets? The police? Hate crimes? Self inflicted gun deaths?

I'll argue it's the culture. As the linked article shows, relating to firearms "black men are more likely to die in homicides" while "white men are more likely to die in suicides". And oddly enough, the figures that established the white suicide rate suggests that 60 percent of all gun related suicides occur in "Western States". This information came from studies done via our government's "Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Wide-ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research" database. You can find their link to the information in the article I linked to above as well.

I also believe this study suggests that if black homicides were eliminated from the whole equation our gun homicide rate would drop tremendously. Obviously, we can't exclude those figures from the calculations but I'd suggest some sort of effort be employed to dramatically reduce (in a perfect world, eliminate) all black on black homicides altogether. Though, given our the challenges our society faces today I'd argue that such a reduction would not be a realistic or practical suggestion. Call it what you want, paint any pretty picture of it that you might want to paint but the black on black homicides are not going to simply "go away" via a "gun ban".

If the person in possession of a gun is in possession of that gun to commit a criminal act then that person most likely won't care if the gun he or she is in possession of is "registered" or not. Nor will that person care if the gun is "banned". They're going to use it.

At least one reader of the article, Mike Watkins commented with: "Liberals love to tell you how we should emulate some gun-restricting country, like for instance Sweden, because “their low gun homicide rates prove gun control works.

Come back at them with this: if you remove young urban black male homicides by other young urban black males, from US statistics, our gun homicide rate is about the same as Sweden’s.

THE PROBLEM IS NOT GUNS, THE PROBLEM IS THE SUB-CULTURES WITHIN THE US THAT TEACH THE YOUTH THAT VIOLENCE IS PART OF BEING A MAN."

I'm inclined to agree with Mr. Watkins. One other suggestion that I think should be factored into the study would include those gun related homicides perpetrated by illegal immigrants including those MS-13, etc. folks. Let's factor those figures in and see how low we just might go beyond where the article has our nation at right now.

I'm convinced, given the statistics I've read while reviewing this information that guns are not the problem. Given the varied cultures we've brought into our nation, the wrong people in possession of firearms, their sole purpose of "ownership", their evident intent and their support networks and nefarious incentives suggests the problem lies somewhere other than the "gun" and "legitimate gun ownership". Until we get a grip on our criminal situation we'll continue experiencing this behavior. Homicides will continue to occur and will increase. We need to focus on a solution to the problem, not a politically correct excuse for the problem.

We need to put our "big boy pants" on and admit that our firearms are not the problem, those folks who should never be in possession of them are. We can't effectively "ban" firearms from everyone. We'll only be banning firearms from those who "legally" possess them.

Just sayin'

IMHO
#

I Agree. James Comey's Not Credible!

He's not at all credible. After reviewing what I'd already suspected... the possibility that Comey was colluding with the democrats and in particular the democrat elites to get their candidate elected as POTUS I'm convinced Comey's just another liberal shill who's all-in for himself and whatever personal gain he can get. He's not an honorable, non-partisan individual, he's a shill. Just another political hack for his politico handlers to use in their time of need. IMHO.

Here's David Limbaugh's take on this shill Comey. Limbaugh covers it perfectly! Like Limbaugh, I gave him the benefit of the doubt at first. Being very familiar with Law Enforcement and the global angst against ALL law enforcement folks these days I'm inclined to immediately side with the Law Enforcement community first then, if appropriate after all of the facts, information, etc. is in I'll wholly make my mind up accordingly.

In regards to Comey I have. I believe Comey's a bought and paid for liberal shill. A politico's prostitute. He's as corrupt or more corrupt than those he's imprisoned over the years.

Read Limbaugh's article in the link provided above. There's really nothing more to say.



I'll leave it at that.

IMHO
#

Who Controls The World's Money?

Well hell, let's start with the Rothschild's... Globally? They're sitting pretty queenish...

Here's THAT start:

Have you ever wondered who truly controls the global markets? Here’s a good start at finding the answer. Just follow the money.

ROTHSCHILD OWNED & CONTROLLED BANKS:

"Afghanistan: Bank of Afghanistan
Albania: Bank of Albania Algeria: Bank of Algeria
Argentina: Central Bank of Argentina
Armenia: Central Bank of Armenia
Aruba: Central Bank of Aruba
Australia: Reserve Bank of Australia
Austria: Austrian National Bank
Azerbaijan: Central Bank of Azerbaijan Republic
Bahamas: Central Bank of The Bahamas Bahrain: Central Bank of Bahrain
Bangladesh: Bangladesh Bank
Barbados: Central Bank of Barbados
Belarus: National Bank of the Republic of Belarus
Belgium: National Bank of Belgium
Belize: Central Bank of Belize
Benin: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO)
Bermuda: Bermuda Monetary Authority
Bhutan: Royal Monetary Authority of Bhutan
Bolivia: Central Bank of Bolivia
Bosnia: Central Bank of Bosnia and Herzegovina
Botswana: Bank of Botswana
Brazil: Central Bank of Brazil
Bulgaria: Bulgarian National Bank
Burkina Faso: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO)
Burundi: Bank of the Republic of Burundi
Cambodia: National Bank of Cambodia
Came Roon: Bank of Central African States
Canada: Bank of Canada – Banque du Canada:
Cayman Islands: Cayman Islands Monetary Authority
Central African Republic: Bank of Central African States
Chad: Bank of Central African States
Chile: Central Bank of Chile
China: The People’s Bank of China
Colombia: Bank of the Republic
Comoros: Central Bank of Comoros
Congo: Bank of Central African States
Costa Rica: Central Bank of Costa Rica
Côte d’Ivoire: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO)
Croatia: Croatian National Bank
Cuba: Central Bank of Cuba
Cyprus: Central Bank of Cyprus
Czech Republic: Czech National Bank
Denmark: National Bank of Denmark
Dominican Republic: Central Bank of the Dominican Republic
East Caribbean area: Eastern Caribbean Central Bank
Ecuador: Central Bank of Ecuador
Egypt: Central Bank of Egypt
El Salvador: Central Reserve Bank of El Salvador
Equatorial Guinea: Bank of Central African States
Estonia: Bank of Estonia
Ethiopia: National Bank of Ethiopia
European Union: European Central Bank
Fiji: Reserve Bank of Fiji
Finland: Bank of Finland
France: Bank of France
Gabon: Bank of Central African States The
Gambia: Central Bank of The Gambia
Georgia: National Bank of Georgia
Germany: Deutsche Bundesbank
Ghana: Bank of Ghana
Greece: Bank of Greece
Guatemala: Bank of Guatemala
Guinea Bissau: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO)
Guyana: Bank of Guyana
Haiti: Central Bank of Haiti
Honduras: Central Bank of Honduras
Hong Kong: Hong Kong Monetary Authority
Hungary: Magyar Nemzeti Bank
Iceland: Central Bank of Iceland
India: Reserve Bank of India
Indonesia: Bank Indonesia
Iran: The Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran:
Iraq: Central Bank of Iraq
Ireland: Central Bank and Financial Services Authority of Ireland
Israel: Bank of Israel
Italy: Bank of Italy
Jamaica: Bank of Jamaica
Japan: Bank of Japan
Jordan: Central Bank of Jordan
Kazakhstan: National Bank of Kazakhstan
Kenya: Central Bank of Kenya
Korea: Bank of Korea
Kuwait: Central Bank of Kuwait
Kyrgyzstan: National Bank of the Kyrgyz Republic
Latvia: Bank of Latvia
Lebanon: Central Bank of Lebanon
Lesotho: Central Bank of Lesotho
Libya: Central Bank of Libya (Their most recent conquest)
Uruguay: Central Bank of Uruguay
Lithuania: Bank of Lithuania
Luxembourg: Central Bank of Luxembourg
Macao: Monetary Authority of Macao
Macedonia: National Bank of the Republic of Macedonia
Madagascar: Central Bank of Madagascar
Malawi: Reserve Bank of Malawi
Malaysia: Central Bank of Malaysia
Mali: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO)
Malta: Central Bank of Malta
Mauritius: Bank of Mauritius
Mexico: Bank of Mexico
Moldova: National Bank of Moldova
Mongolia: Bank of Mongolia
Montenegro: Central Bank of Montenegro
Morocco: Bank of Morocco
Mozambique: Bank of Mozambique
Namibia: Bank of Namibia
Nepal: Central Bank of Nepal
Netherlands: Netherlands Bank
Netherlands Antilles: Bank of the Netherlands Antilles
New Zealand: Reserve Bank of New Zealand
Nicaragua: Central Bank of Nicaragua
Niger: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO)
Nigeria: Central Bank of Nigeria
Norway: Central Bank of Norway
Oman: Central Bank of Oman
Pakistan: State Bank of Pakistan
Papua New Guinea: Bank of Papua New Guinea
Paraguay: Central Bank of Paraguay
Peru: Central Reserve Bank of Peru
Philippines: Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas
Poland: National Bank of Poland
Portugal: Bank of Portugal
Qatar: Qatar Central Bank
Romania: National Bank of Romania
Russia: Central Bank of Russia
Rwanda: National Bank of Rwanda
San Marino: Central Bank of the Republic of San Marino
Samoa: Central Bank of Samoa
Saudi Arabia: Saudi Arabian Monetary Agency
Senegal: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO)
Serbia: National Bank of Serbia
Seychelles: Central Bank of Seychelles
Sierra Leone: Bank of Sierra Leone
Singapore: Monetary Authority of Singapore
Slovakia: National Bank of Slovakia
Slovenia: Bank of Slovenia
Solomon Islands: Central Bank of Solomon Islands
South Africa: South African Reserve Bank
Spain: Bank of Spain
Sri Lanka: Central Bank of Sri Lanka
Sudan: Bank of Sudan
Surinam: Central Bank of Suriname
Swaziland: The Central Bank of Swaziland
Sweden: Sveriges Riksbank
Switzerland: Swiss National Bank
Tajikistan: National Bank of Tajikistan
Tanzania: Bank of Tanzania
Thailand: Bank of Thailand
Togo: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO)
Tonga: National Reserve Bank of Tonga
Trinidad and Tobago: Central Bank of Trinidad and Tobago
Tunisia: Central Bank of Tunisia
Turkey: Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey
Uganda: Bank of Uganda
Ukraine: National Bank of Ukraine
United Arab Emirates: Central Bank of United Arab Emirates
United Kingdom: Bank of England
United States: Federal Reserve, Federal Reserve Bank of New York
Vanuatu: Reserve Bank of Vanuatu
Venezuela: Central Bank of Venezuela
Vietnam: The State Bank of Vietnam
Yemen: Central Bank of Yemen
Zambia: Bank of Zambia Zimbabwe: Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe"

And here’s another little “factoid”… It’s alleged that “The FED and the IRS FACT: US Federal Reserve is a privately-owned company, sitting on its very own patch of land, immune to the US laws”.
>>>
Ummmmm- Don’t it make you wonder…
This information was gleaned by me from a recent post to another site that was made by an “anonymous” source.
We’re in an uphill battle to retain our independence and protect our republic.

IMHO
#

The Muslim Takeover Of Australia?!

The Muslim Takeover of Australia is happening.

People will ask if there truly is a planned "take-over", a "coup" of sorts by muslims who want Australia to be their next caliphate? Yep, there is and it's happening. I mean, why not! Australia confiscated almost all of the citizens guns several years ago. Only the privileged are allowed to own guns. Australia banished ammunition, Australia opened their borders to "muslim" refugees. Australia's passed and enacted laws that protect muslims, more or less making them a privileged and protected group unlike the rest of the citizens of Australia. Yeah, the muslims are openly trying to take control of Australia.

And why wouldn't they?

Australia's liberal government made themselves the largest, brightest, shiniest, reddest apple on this entire planet to the muslim crowd and now the muslims are making their move. What else would be expected. Threatened with violence, war the Aussies crumbled over time. The Aussies fell to their knees to islam. They've been subdued and now they're submitting.

"Fight against those who believe not in Allah, nor in the Last Day, nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger (Muhammad …) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islam) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued. [Sura 9:29, p. 248]"

IMHO
#

Thanks to The Middle East Forum and Mark Durie for sharing this revealing information with us.

Mueller's Investigation! Only A Year?!

The "Mueller investigation" has run on for over a year now with "nothing new" or so we're told. Special Counsel Robert Mueller's allegedly been running an "out of control and unaccountable witch hunt against Donald Trump" our POTUS. Special counsel Mueller's been accused of abusing his power, his authority, his mandate "by straying far beyond the scope of his mandate" and he (Mueller) according to the press (liberal AND some conservatives) is in jeopardy of being replaced.

WHY?! I mean, I'm not a Mueller fan. I don't even know him. I don't necessarily like him and I don't necessarily dislike him. He's an investigator at heart. An established, career investigator. Let him do his job. Let him investigate.

I'm not a liberal, I'm not a Republican nor am I anything near a Democrat. I'm not one of those smaller, reactionary "third party" associates and I'm not fond of any party candidates simply because of their "party". I'm a conservative. I'm definitely nowhere near perfect! Not even close. I was raised as a conservative and I was raised to recognize right from wrong and to make my decisions accordingly. I was also raised to accept whatever baggage comes with my decisions and to learn from those decisions- right, wrong or indifferent- then, now, in the future. Logic, common sense and ownership plays a huge part in our life process... or at least it should. Coupled with that comes duty and dedication to yourself, yours and our society. I retired after over forty years of service in the law enforcement career field and am familiar with what it takes to complete a thorough investigation of acts and/or omissions committed by folks. Some of those investigations took years, some are still being investigated. I'm still called back into the fold by folks, by "agencies" to look at challenges to society, law enforcement with a set "fresh eyes" and a "clear mind" in relation to the matter at hand. Several investigations I was assigned and/or performed or helped investigate are still "outstanding". In other words, they're still being investigated but they're not nearly as "fresh" as the new ones being piled on the investigator's desks. The duty bound investigator requires that they all be investigated IN THEIR ENTIRETY... and quite often they can't be.

Obviously I don't know Mueller. But being that career "investigator" I was, I can identify with a lot of his angst, his desire to follow the information to the end. He has legal boundaries that he has to stay within and he's in one helluva politically charged situation. I was lucky. Most of those investigations I did were usually your run of the mill, bad assed idiots who simply went nuts one day and did stupid things. Sure, later in my career I caught quite a few of those planned, pre-meditated, choreographed, "organized" criminal events and yes, I did have folks who would "prefer" I'd simply "get'er-done" fast so as to catch who I could catch and forget about the res. My "handlers" preferred short, sweet investigations that nipped the political element in the bud. They preferred it be wrapped up and that point so I could move on to the next one... or maybe (was it?) so I wouldn't expose the whole puzzle, just the piece(s) they wanted exposed.

"Investigations are outstanding challenges, they provide an outstanding and quite often rewarding career to those who love to be challenged. Every investigation is a puzzle and like any puzzle, every true investigator wants to find all of the pieces and complete the ENTIRE puzzle, not just the pretty picture on the cover. If "it's there", it's there. If it's not, it's not.

For once, I'm "all in" for allowing Mueller to go where he needs to go to get the job done. Legally, he most likely won't be able to complete the puzzle but morally and professionally and personally he's duty-bound. He can't help himself... he's an investigator first, a politico second. He's just trying to solve the whole "puzzle".

Just let the man do his job.


IMHO
#

Obama, the king of illegal immigration...

My usual morning read brought me to this particular article found on the American Patriot Daily. The article showcases Obama's accomplishments relating to at least one particular "immigrant" from Kenya. 45 year old illegal immigrant Billy Chemirmir just might have become this nation's most prolific serial killer. His prey? Elderly women. His weapon? Charm and a pillow and there's most likely more like beasts like Chemirmir "out there" roaming our streets.

It's suggested and believed that he's been killing elderly women (at least) since the day he arrived in our country as an illegal immigrant, protected by the obama's wholly lax "immigration laws". And the liberal left supported this animal and those like him with their "open borders", dreamer policies. Obama's policies made our nation more vulnerable to these predators and he knew and still knows it. He even claims he's "proud" of his "accomplishments" regarding immigration.

Obama, he's not our friend. He never was.

IMHO
#

Obama And His Administration... Supporting Soros With Our Funds?!

Most of us suspected that the failed POSPOTUS barrack hussein obama and his administration had supported George Soros financially and politically when Soros meddled in Albania's political affairs. Let there be no doubt that there's a "Deep State", "Global Agenda". There's a huge push now more than ever to bring weak, fledgling international communities into the liberal fold. They're promising everything for everyone yet providing little if anything for anyone who climbs on their global bandwagon.

And that piece of shat obummer knew full well the intentions of soros, et. al. I have no doubt that they're still working together to "socialize" the world, one screwed up nation at a time. If the nation's aren't screwed up before the Soros train gets there they will be afterwards. Just ask Abania, France, England, Sweden, etc. It gives a whole new meaning to the East West Management Institute and the "Open Society Foundation"... or not.

Soros is the primary support of the global agenda and he knows he's running out of time. He's trying to ensure his spawn will continue his goal if/when he dies. I'm of the belief that the POS ex-POTUS obama is simply allowing his puppeteer to pull the strings much like what happened when obummer was "in office".

IMHO
#

Europe's Self Imposed Demise!

For at least the past two decades Europe has opened it's collective doors to the invaders from islam, from the Middle East. Germany's Chancellor, Angela Merkel embraces her liberal muslims as they pour into the very country she was elected to destroy. She's a surviving child of the communist East German bloc, has surrounded herself with "like" liberals and has relentlessly pursued the demise of Germany as we once knew it. She's not shy about opening the borders and embracing, hell protecting those who would prefer that Germany be destroyed. And it is from the government within, from the current seemingly endless migrant horde of invaders.

When you invite the beast into your home you get the wrath of the beast. From the linked article: "In most European countries—including England, Germany, Italy and Russia, Christian deaths outnumbered Christian births from 2010 to 2015" as the muslim populations continue to increase dramatically! Much like a slime mold, it's only a matter of time before islam devours everything in its path. There's far fewer Christian births than muslim births throughout the world. Europe should prepare for more "lone wolf" muslim attacks on Christians or all things non-muslim. The more the Christian base is reduced, the larger the muslim base grows, in comparison. It's simple mathematics.

Nope, the demise of Europe. England, Sweden, Norway, Germany, France... it's by design. Ancient design and it's certainly not a surprise to those of us who are on the outside looking in. Or at least it shouldn't be.

IMHO
#

Bill Maher Defends Laura Ingraham?!

Wait! What?!

Bill Maher defends Laura Ingraham AND Free Speech in a liberal panel discussion about the child activist david hog? What the heck's going on here. Maher's a leftist.

Just when I thought I could actually despise someone enough to wholly cull them off of my list of most unfavorable people never to be read or watched again, I read what Maher's done. Maher defended Laura Ingraham's free speech discussion to a panel of ultra liberals HE GATHERED and interacted with on his show?! I quit drinking a long time ago, I don't do ANY drugs, I've been tested and have been told I'm a rational, responsive, mentally healthy human being so what's up with this?! This isn't April 1st. I'm not a complete blithering idiot yet so what's the catch with Maher and that ultra liberal school kid Hog brat thing?

Nah, I read it but still don't want to believe it. It has to be a trap, a set up. I've watched Maher a time or two in the past and couldn't stomach his show from start to end each time I watched it so, something's up.

Liberals don't bash liberals over their treatment of conservatives. Liberals praise liberals for that! Although it can be argued Ingraham's not altogether conservative. Maybe that's the catch... she's not wholly a liberal and she's not wholly a conservative so Hog and his handlers believe she's fair bait. Either way, diaper boy Hogg ain't going to like Bill Maher anymore... Boycott Maher next, eh Hog.

IMHO
#

Who's Behind The Invading Horde From South and Central America?

Guess! I'm pretty sure you won't be surprised by the real answer. Here's a hint. He's allegedly a "former" Hungarian Jew who turned against his fellow jews over time and tosses his money around to those who want it, with provisions of course. His birth family was forced to hide their identity and pass themselves off as Christians in order to avoid being marched off by the Nazis to the internment camps where many Jewish folks were subsequently slaughtered. At least, that's the history we're told of this fellow. Either way, he was far too young to be a Nazi SS officer during WWII let alone a member of the SS.

One of the fellows allegedly (wink-wink) behind much, if not all of the funding for most things anti-USA that are happening in this country is obviously the one and only George Soros, at least. It's also apparent Soros has some very sharp, very large hooks that accompany the money he and his fellow "money men" have been "handing out" globally for decades and in particular here in the United States. Before we go any further let's address a couple of challenges up front.

In the interest of fairness and accuracy let's agree that George Soros was not the Nazi SS officer during the Second World War that many of us were led to believe he was. He was only 9 yrs. old when the war started and was 14 or 15 yrs. old when it allegedly came to an end. He is wealthy, he claims to be Jewish but he's also one of the global elite who's been identified as one of those mega-rich yahoos who's "all in" for a new "World Order"... or whatever, however you might want to label it.

These "migrants", these "immigrants" are pawns. Nothing more, nothing less. The migrants, the immigrants themselves are being used by their handlers to invade the United States. Like it or not our country is the "mantle trophy" of the world. There is no greater prize to the global elite than to ensure our republic fails, succumbs to socialism at best. Those who are marching to our borders are, for the most part needy, innocent "victims" who have been convinced there's a better life ahead of them when at the end of their march. They're not the object of my angst. They're doing what they think is best for their families, themselves and quite frankly who wouldn't? Unfortunately, they're being used as pawns by the global elite. The global elite's goal is to occupy and subsequently effect change. They can't adequately effect that change if they don't have the overwhelming force to compel it, peacefully or otherwise.

We, the United States of America are that targeted group and we're in a helluva struggle for our very existence, as we know it.

IMHO
#

Washington State's New Gun Law?!

• • −
  • 
    
   This new Washington State Gun Law is nothing more than a pre-cursor to wholesale gun seizure/forfeiture weeks, months years, decades down the road. We should have seen this coming from our legislators but hey, they got it in and made it happen.
  Rather than write it again I've simply posted one of my comments I left on the site and below...
  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
   
  

  "...allows local authorities to confiscate firearms from people believed to pose a threat to themselves or others."

  This is ambiguous as hell. What criteria is used to determine whether a person poses "a threat to themselves or others"? I'm pretty sure the politicos have their definitions laying around somewhere that would address my question but I've yet to see it. I have read several proposed legislation "options" over this past legislative session relating to our politicos providing our law enforcement the authority to confiscate firearms from those of us who have legally acquired them, legally care for them, safely store them and otherwise legally posses and carry them. Judging from what I've read none of those proposed legislative pieces took into account that there's already laws on the books adequately detailing and providing the legal confiscation of any firearm if/when necessary (in this state anyways) in conformance with our second amendment rights. i.e. If a firearm was used in the commission of a crime including crimes against persons or property, threats of personal harm, psychological review and subsequent intervention and more then there's provisions to secure the firearm and hold the firearm until a court order is issued to release the firearm back to the owner or alternatively, a court order is issued to destroy the seized firearm. Let's not get distracted by the "Red Flag" banner. It won't stop there. There's also proposed legislation that would afford our law enforcement to arbitrarily wander out to the neighborhoods, do a "knock and talk" on known gun owners homes and conduct an inspection of the gun owner's premises to ensure the firearms conform to the new "storage" requirements. If not then the suggested remedy would be for the officer(s) to secure those firearms and remove them from the possession of the law abiding gun owner, i.e. CITIZEN. This is absurd, at best. Further there's another tool called a Protection of Abuse order. Personally, I think it has some merit but it also has potential for abuse by the authorities. A "Protection of Abuse" order is a tool used by law enforcement personnel that can be ambiguous and suggests any lower court judge (most any judge for that matter, with some exceptions) can make a decision, issue an order that could proactively be served on a gun owner who's deemed by law enforcement to be a threat to himself/herself and/or others so as to prevent a potential assault on any given citizen. Unfortunately it could also be abused to effectively trump our second amendment rights regardless of what the constitution provides, depending on the intent of the government at the time. Don't tell me judicial overreach doesn't happen... it does. Don't suggest to me double jeopardy is a thing of the past... it isn't. Don't tell me abuse of authority isn't real... it can be and quite frankly it does happen. In the meantime our rights would have been violated, our home's would have been invaded, our property(ies) would have been confiscated in addition to the previous "convictions" and/or charges, whatever they might be. And in the end we've been charged with a myriad of other offenses relating to the alleged "improper" hence illegal possession and security of our firearms. By the time we've paid the big bucks to sue to get our guns back from those who violated our constitutional rights by seizing them we're broke and the guns have either been destroyed or rendered inoperable or retained and farmed out to other agencies via the local "law enforcement transfers" program or otherwise sold at a Law Enforcement auction. Nah, I have a problem with this legislation. I truly don't trust our politicos and I surely don't trust the judges that preside over issues on behalf of the state. Enforce the laws we already have on the books. Don't create new ones just to justify a politico's seat in the local government.

  IMHO of course.

  
  

  #
  
  

The Red Flag Law, A Gateway To Firearm Confiscation!

The "Red Flag" law! Have you heard of it? Have you read it? Do you know what it entails? Is your state one of those 30 plus states who have either signed on to the law or are seriously thinking about enacting a similar law? 

It's nothing more than a gateway to wholesale gun confiscation.

But, don't let me influence you. Read the article and the comments and do your own research. Educate yourself and make your own decision based on your research results.

In the meantime I captured this response by one of the readers/contributors to the site, Tyrone Jackson. Jackson wrote this in response to another reader's challenge that he misunderstood the Founding Father's true intentions when our Second Amendment was drafted.

Here's the rebuttal Jackson gave to one of the other "guests" on the site. If you go to the link above and drop down to the comments you can view the entire exchange.

 

Tyrone Jackson 

 

Here are a few quotes from our Founding Fathers that clarify their viewpoint regarding our Second Amendment:
(BTW - I find it amusing when people Up Vote their own comments)
.
“The right … of bearing arms… is declared to be inherent in the people.”
Fisher Ames, one of the framers of the 2nd Amendment in the first congress
.
“The great object is that every man be armed … Everyone who is able may have a gun. But have we not learned by experience that, necessary as it is to have arms … it is still far from being the case?”
-Patrick Henry
.
“I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery.”
“And what country can preserve its liberties if its rules are not warned from time to time that this people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms.”
-Thomas Jefferson
.
“To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them”
-Richard Henry Lee
.
“The advantage of being armed is an advantage which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation … the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms.”
-James Madison
.
“A free people ought … to be armed.”
-George Washington
.
The founders meant the militia to be we, the people. Each of us individually is “the militia.”
So, what is this militia? Try these quotes on that topic:
“The militia are the people at large.”
-Tench Coxe Attny. Gen. of Penn. and Asst. Sec of Treasury under Washington
.
“Who are the militia? They consist now of the whole people.”
-George Mason
.
“The militia is composed of free citizens.”
-Samuel Adams
.
“A militia… are in fact the people themselves.”
-Richard Henry Lee

....Tyrone Jackson silenced his critic with this post. Great information here!