We're Witnessing A Coup!

While reviewing an article online last night regarding the "Ukrainian Investigation" I stumbled across a discussion in the comments following the article that not only piqued my interest but assured me we are witnessing a coup against our POTUS Donald J. Trump, against our country, our Constitutional Republic as we know it!

What follows is information provided to a Twitter queen, Tracy Beanz that was included in her exchange of tweets with a seemingly reliable, credible (but anonymous-to us) source of information. It's all relative to the "Whistle Blower" situation our government is experiencing right now. This series of TWEETS between these two journalists seems to clearly lay things out re: the most recent Ukraine fiasco and the left’s rush to “get-r-done”! The left, they’re on full damage control, code red press.

Little do they know the dems, the left have been played… again.

As mentioned the information/exchange was received by Tracy Beanz in a series of tweets. I copied, pasted the tweets to this blog and restructured them to narrative form.

Here’s the Tracy Beanz lead in to the information without any edits other than the removal of hyperlinks from the exchange.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

1:16 PM · Sep 27, 2019·

Tracy Beanz
@tracybeanz

"Many of you know me well by now, and you know that I wouldn't share what I am about to share unless I was CONFIDENT that the source could be trusted. Before I post this, I want to let everyone know that I trust this source implicitly. I was given this information several days ago.

Since receiving it, a number of wheels have already begun to turn which validate many of the points. The person got a bit of a bug and was sick for several days, but today provided me with a shareable write up. It is very clear. I don't need to add anything.

As always, use your own discernment. I have used mine, gotten permission, and decided I am absolutely comfortable posting this. Please read and share should you find it valuable. What follows is directly from my source.

“Much of this seems to be in motion given recent events”

And here's the information sent to Tracy Beanz via a series of tweets.

"DISCLAIMER: I am not an insider. I work an interesting job that has afforded me two luxuries: the time to dig/research/analyze/contextualize and discern what I believe to be truths about our world, government, and intelligence agencies; and the opportunity to talk to a lot of interesting people with diverse experiences in everything from the mundane to the … spooky, even paranormal. It was through some of these contacts, most established well before the events of 2015-2016, that my attention was drawn to the whole SpyGate saga in the closing months of 2016. Since that time, these sources have provided me with valuable context, confirmation, and – when needed – the debunking of my own theories and analysis of a very tangled web of spies, G-men, politicians, and their praetorian guard. While I have developed several excellent sources who’ve proved their reliability and honesty over many conversations, none of these sources claim to have every answer, or to know every detail. Despite their access and professional duties, which outrank my own, they ultimately are not calling the shots. Online I’ve operated under a strict Open Source policy. While I often entertain speculation, my own analysis and writing has always relied upon OS information rather than “trust me, I talked to an insider and this is what they say” approach to make my case.

That, to me, is the most helpful way I can contribute. Which is why I hesitated to share any of this initially. This update is entirely anecdotal. Take this however you wish, it’s not meant to be a prediction only a reporting of the feelings of several individuals with direct knowledge of the SpyGate investigation. None of them are Trump, or in his closest circle, so ultimately none of them are in “the room” when the big decisions are made. Still, in the week it’s taken me to get this out, several events have transpired which have confirmed at least portions of what I was told. Which is what always happens when these people feed me information or nudge me to look in a certain direction.

So let’s get to it.

At the start of September I was asked to make a trip to DC to meet in person with several of my best sources. Most of these sources are/had become friends, so a request to come out wasn’t unusual.

SHIFTING FOCUS OF THE ROLL OUT:

Much of our time was spent discussing the Ukraine, specifically the role of the State Department. Names like Nuland, Kerry, Clinton, McCain and others were discussed at length. I was told that the attention and focus is going to start to shift from the DOJ/FBI to State. This is because the FBI/DOJ side is just about ready to roll in terms of disclosure/indictments, but State is a different beast. According to what I was told, “the legal pathway to the biggest fish goes through the State Department and starts in the Ukraine. According to our discussions, the Ukraine was going to come into major focus because both sides of the establishment aisle got dirty in the Ukraine and left themselves exposed. It’s a “pathway” to the Clinton machine, the Soros machine, the neocon machine, the neoliberal machine – not to mention organized crime in both Russia and our own.

*Note: This update was compiled on the 20th of September for reference. A bug knocked me on my ass – which delayed it going out.

That’s regrettable only because of the week’s events regarding the Ukraine. It’s a bit of confirmation of the above. NOT WITHOUT CONCERNS: For the first time in any of our discussions over the past several years, I detected some concern on the parts of the grunts in the field.

The concern is not in being able to make the cases (most have already made), but in what the fallout will be once the partisan politics of the moment are inserted into the whole concoction. This is important, so I want to expound as much as possible on this point. On prior occasions, the discussion of how to avoid using any of this as a political weapon in 2020 had been brought up.

In the past I was made to feel confident that the goal was not partisan but to actually clean up real problems within our system. I DO NOT BELIEVE THIS HAS CHANGED. On this trip I was told, explicitly, that “Trump and Barr have the establishment’s nuts in a vice” – not just SpyGate plotters, and not just our domestic establishment. I was told due to events in 2017 and into ’18 they now have more evidence than they originally anticipated when “the op” (their words) was put into motion. They expected to catch certain fish in their net – and did – but through events which I cannot get explicit about, a “treasure trove of shit” was uncovered/discovered which now allows them to go all the way up the chain in multiple 5Eye countries.

Now – this sounds GREAT, right? And it is. I am fully in support of exposing the whole sorted lot of snakes and believe, fully, that the people sharing this information with me want nothing more as well. BUT there is a concern – and it’s this: How much can be exposed without undermining and imploding the very republic they’re trying to preserve? That’s always been the big question – but now there’s genuine consternation about it. This isn’t about protecting institutions, it’s about “what happens after you pull that pin?” I took all this talk as a bad sign at first. It was the first time they had talked about any hesitation to “go too far”. But over the course of the conversation I was reassured.

Will touch on this at the end.

Apparently there are now two camps chirping in “the boss’s ear”:

1) those urging caution and taking the easy shots (the low hanging DOJ/FBI fruit – names we know but NOT the lieutenants or cabinet level), and
2) those who want to expose it ALL, consequences be damned.

Almost everyone I’ve spoken with is in the latter camp, and they all believe the boss is too – but it’s clearly a conversation being had amongst those doing this work.

Here’s the rub: there’s not enough time between now and 2020’s election to get the job done. So how much justice can be doled out without falling into the trap of it all being painted as political persecution by the establishment media? (Note: Again, just look at the Biden/Ukraine story which broke after I returned).

The consensus from these people used to be: “we need to get this all out before the 2020 cycle truly begins to make sure it happens”, and now there is at least a portion of them urging Trump to stretch out the indictments/disclosure over the next 10 months to score the maximum political impact because A) the cases are strong enough to sustain it and a second term is needed to complete the job.

I was reminded that if the internal debates are now about how to best roll out this evidence to secure 2020, then the cases they have must be locks. They wouldn’t risk the political spin unless they knew they had the cases cold, especially the advisors thinking in terms of re-election. /END

Beanz note: I wouldn't have shared this if I wasn't SURE I could trust my source. I am, and so I did. I am but a vessel. Take this as you may.. Thanks guys!

A quick note by Beanz on Beanz' last thread


ADDENDUM: the responses to this have been interesting - from pessimistic and angry to hopeful and excited. Many people aren’t reading the thread carefully and lots of people are mad at me for what it says. Journalism isn’t holding things back so people feel better. It’s dropping it all even if you perceive it as painful, which some of you do. If I had hidden or held any part of this for the sake of feelings it would have been just like what we deal with now. People are going to have to get used to hearing hard things sometimes, and also reading and responding carefully. Don’t jump to conclusions etc. I will never edit something so people feel better. I’m sorry. Not happening. It’s the truth or nothing. This was what I was given.”#

>>>>>>>>>>>>

You're back with me, BwaHa now. I'll go back and try to find the original article so you folks can do your own research but the information above is a true and accurate post of the exchange of tweets between Beanz and her "informant".

That's the info in a nutshell. If this isn't a coup against our POTUS, our Constitutional Republic by the Deep State (whoever they are) then what is it?!

Stay Tuned.

#

A Coup d'etat in the making?!

I was reading some articles that were sent my way and this one that references a proposed coup de'tat from the left caught my eye. The left? They're not even trying to hide their desire to destroy our Republic. They've openly proposed a consortium of sorts with the global elite, or vice versa, given the current political climate, globally.

In short, the agreement suggests that those who are hell-bent on denying us our Second Amendment rights, those who seem to believe the First Amendment applies only to them... those who kept us in check for eight long years (and more, if you count RINOs) are now openly planning a coup d'état for our 2020 elections should our duly elected and sworn POTUS Donald J. Trump win and/or not concede the election, regardless of any determination of fraud or otherwise?! Isn't this some sort of collusion towards a final effect of treason? Their fall back plan suggests that if the majority makes a decision in 2020 to re-elect our POTUS Donald J. Trump and the minority doesn't agree with that decision then the minority will openly collude with others to prevent the likelihood of our duly elected and sitting POTUS Donald J. Trump from assuming office for a second term as POTUS in 2020, however they can. Regardless of legalities and regardless of the will of the majority. The very fact that this whole scheme is being posted as a hot topic on the internet suggests the global elite owns the left. But then, many of us already knew that. The global elite, the left is pushing for the termination of our republic. They want socialism, at least. They want us to be the crown jewel of socialist states that make up the globe... we, the citizens of this mighty fine United States of America will not benefit from this treasonous act, should they prevail.

Simply put, the global elite, the left have their plan in place. I have no doubt that their votes are being purchased and/or otherwise secured as I write this. It's probable that many of those votes were purchased quite some time ago via long term "contracts". The left? They will not lose the 2020 election!

The left is emboldened!

The media is owned by them, our education is owned by them, our health care is owned by them, our economy is owned by them, our day to day lives are already falling under more of their control, constraints effected by the left, our personal communications and our recreational activities are being controlled and/or determined by the left, many of our citizens and politicos are owned by them and arguably the polls and voting machines are owned/controlled by them... it goes on from there. This "coup"? It's here already but the roots just aren't deep enough for the left to feel that level of confidence they think they should feel before they make their final push. They're predictable because the left is comprised of the cowards, the leeches of our society, leeches of the globe and though they have their plan(s) and though their foundation is in place they're still the cowards they were and will always be. Folks, this latest push is a hue and cry from the left for them to muster their spineless trolls together and try to effect some sort of a coup d'etat should the 2020 election run contrary to their manipulated, planned and expected end results. When our POTUS Trump gets re-elected we should expect a wholesale coup. RINOs and Demoncrats will circle their wagons and destroy our republic as we know it, if they can. And these leftist fools aren't even beginning to disguise their efforts or plans anymore which makes me wonder who the fools truly are, us or them. They're emboldened by their global handlers.

The Kool-Aid's kicking in for them.

IMHO

Many thanks to The Gateway Pundit for sharing this.

#

The Russian Collusion Connection!!!

Let there be no doubt there was most definitely Russian collusion during the periods leading up to and through the 2016 national election. It's been hyped by the left and has been exposed via fantastic sleuthing by folks who truly have nothing to lose either way, liberal or conservative.

All they wanted to do was get to the bottom of the allegations and determine whether or not there was any merit to the "collusion" claims. After a thorough, seemingly bi-partisan (though not wholly as a "team" of sorts) investigative process both the left AND the right agreed there was collusion with the Russians. Collusion that was specifically designed to affect the outcome of our national elections, especially the position of POTUS. Both sides determined collusion ran rampant. Both sides determined the POTUS outcome was the primary target of the collusion.

Now, finally... after nearly two years of investigation we can rest assured the Ruskies did interfere and seriously attempted to influence our republic's selection of a president and they ALMOST SUCCEEDED!

The Butcher Bitch of Benghazi was the Russkie's preferred candidate. Don't take my word for it, check out this very well written and substantiated, Investors Business Daily editorial I found on the Investors Business Daily editorial page.

Let there be no question... collusion occurred and our current POTUS, Donald J. Trump was not the preferred candidate, rather, he was the target of the collusion. Thank God he won!

Now, can we take this a to the next level and investigate, charge and prosecute all of those involved with this treasonous act? PLEASE!

IMHO
#

THE DEEP STATE CORRUPTION MEMO:

Here's a link to the deep state memo that everyone's been discussing.

Though it's an "opinion piece" authored by Sean Hannity, FOX News host, it contains information relating to a memo involving collusion between Obama, Clinton, Obama's "justice" department, FUSION GPS and many more corrupt politicos and political organizations who were actively involved in efforts to usurp our electoral process at least. The suggested collusion between the players is disgraceful and treasonous at least! In my humble opinion.

Let there be no doubt that there was absolutely an organized attack on our democracy, our republic by those individuals who stood to gain politically, personally, financially at least on a national and global scale.  

I've copied and pasted Hannity's article below but you can reach it in the link above as well. I can't help but ask why heads aren't rolling and folks aren't being prosecuted over this breach of security, blatant abuse of authority and participation in an international attempt at political subterfuge! Having been

Here's the copy and paste of Hannity's article but do visit the links above. They're far more revealing.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Hot on the heels of the House memo exposing deep state corruption comes an equally explosive document from the Senate that shows the story behind the phony dossier is even worse than you thought.

Senators Chuck Grassley and Lindsey Graham have released a heavily redacted, yet very revealing copy of their criminal referral against ex-British spy Christopher Steele, the author of the dubious dossier we now know was parlayed into a FISA warrant by Trump-hating operatives at the Justice Department.

Grassley and Graham tell us that, while working on a second dossier for Clinton opposition research firm Fusion GPS, Steele was being fed information directly from the Obama State Department and from Clinton allies as well as his usual, sketchy Russian sources. That’s right, teams Clinton and Obama were working with a foreign spy to undermine then-candidate Donald Trump.

" … Mr. Steele's memorandum states that his company received this report from (redacted), U.S. State Department, and that the report was the second in the series, and that the report was information that came from a foreign sub source who is in touch with a contact of (redacted), a friend of the Clintons who passed it to (redacted).”

The Grassley-Graham memo goes on to say “it's troubling enough that the Clinton campaign funded Mr. Steele's work, but [worse] that these Clinton associates were contemporaneously feeding Mr. Steele's allegations. It raises huge additional concerns about his credibility."

So, in addition to Hillary Clinton and the Democratic National Committee paying $12 million for a phony, fake-news Russian propaganda dossier to influence the election, we now learn that her associates and the Obama State Department teamed up with Russian sources to funnel allegations to Steele for a second dossier.

The senators are also accusing Christopher Steele of lying either to the FBI or to the British courts.

"There is substantial evidence suggesting that Mr. Steele materially misled the FBI about a key aspect of his dossier efforts, one which bears on his credibility," they wrote.

This Grassley-Graham memo also details how Steele was using his first phony dossier to brief several mainstream media outlets, you know, the folks who bring you fake news, in the summer and the fall of 2016. British court records show Steele acknowledged he peddled his memo to The New York Times, Washington Post, Yahoo News, The New Yorker, and, of course, CNN.

However, since he was working for the FBI, he would have been barred from leaking to the media. In fact, the FBI later cut ties with him when it learned he had broken the rule. So who did he lie to, the FBI or the British courts?

It’s hard to keep all the memos and dossiers straight. If you’re scoring at home, the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence released a memo over the objections of Democrats and the media that showed how the FBI used Steele’s first dossier to get a federal warrant to spy on people close to Trump. The Democrats hope to release their own “memo,” which is not a memo at all but just a sour-grapes rebuttal to the committee’s. The Grassley-Graham memo is a third document that tells us Obama and Clinton operatives fed Steele information to try to damage Trump.

The dossiers, and there are apparently two of them, were cooked up by Steele and are completely unverified claptrap. Yet, the FBI marched one of them into a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court and presented it as evidence. Months later, then FBI Director James Comey admitted it was completely unverified.

And here's what the left and your corrupt media won't tell you: the FISA judge was never told that Hillary Clinton was paying for the phony dossier containing Russian intelligence lies about Donald Trump. And they don’t seem to care that it was first used to try to influence an election, then to get a warrant to spy on an opposition candidate.

The incestuous ties between Fusion, Steele, the Clinton campaign and the Obama Justice Department are alarming. Clinton hired Fusion, which hired Steele. Steele was working with the FBI at the same time. The wife of a top Justice Department official, Bruce Ohr, was hired by Fusion to work with Steele.

The goal of the whole, unseemly syndicate? To launder Russian lies about Donald Trump through the U.S. government, so they could weaponize our own intelligence and law enforcement network against the man who now sits in the Oval Office.

You should be scared. And disgusted.

Sean Hannity currently serves as host of FOX News Channel’s (FNC) Hannity (weekdays 9-10PM/ET).

#

Speaking Of California and Immigration...

It looks like Jerry Brown and his ilk have succeeded in crossing that federal immigration "no cross" line AGAIN!

This time it got the ire of Customs Enforcement Director Thomas Homan.

Yeah, Brown's all about protecting the illegals in his state and to Hell with those who are citizens and are already registered to vote. It's just more of the same re: the democrat rush to get new voters. Given this most recent "in your face" moment by Jerry Brown and California one can hardly overlook the next situation including increased trade and political involvement with China. I've thought for quite some time that California, Jerry Brown, et.al. in particular are actually flirting with the thoughts of achieving a separation from our nation, becoming an "independent" nation, of sorts. That way they can let in all of the illegals they want to let in and they can deal with all of the communist countries they want to deal with over time. Just don't come running back to us and don't complain about the wall.

Personally, I'd call it treason but if they're going to take the ultra liberal route I'm okay with that separation. Brown and communism seems to be synonymous.

IMHO

#

The Clintons, Suitcases Full of Cash and the Russkies!

Folks can say what they want about the Clintons and their (alleged, wink-wink) illegal activities but they're very good at what they do in that arena. Or so I used to think.

They just might have let their greed get the best of them this time.

Remember that little "Uranium One" situation they seem to have got themselves into. Yeah, you know the one where they allegedly (wink-wink) made big bucks on the sale of our uranium to Russia via an alleged shell corporation?

Well, it seems a fellow named William D. Campbell, a past lobbyist for a "Russian firm" and a self admitted undercover operative for the Justice Department has somehow obtained and retained videos and other information detailing "briefcases full of cash" that were allgedly intended to be transferred between Russia to the Clintons.

Like all good undercover operatives Campbell's ready to close the deal on this particular investigation. He's all set to step up and testify to the information he obtained while working as an undercover operative.

“(H)e gathered so much information, there are videotapes where the Russians are opening up briefcases full of cash — these are the people that we then gave uranium to, that we then gave nuclear fuel contracts to,”

"Those briefcases of cash may have been part of a larger money laundering and payoff scheme designed to put cash in the pockets of the Clintons and other officials in return for political favors to Russian firms."

I can't seem to help thinking there might be something going on here that's not all that kosher. I guess we'll just have to wait and see. Here's hoping none of the witnesses commit suicide in the next several months while this investigation runs its course.

In the past it seems to me that those who were set to testify against or otherwise crossed the Clintons in the past seem to have met with tragedy in one form or another. Just sayin'

Be careful out there folks.

IMHO

Get Those Clinton Emails Out In The OPEN!

Let's get those emails and other information out in the open, out to the public as soon as possible! Let's show everyone what ACTUALLY did take place during that failed POSPOTUS Barack Hussein Obama's eight very long years of dark, destructive, divisive "rule" of our country.

Let's see, hear and decide for ourselves what the Clinton Cartel and their liberal friends were truly up to. Not the watered down, redacted, "held for national security" reasons we were force fed over the past eight years. Let's see why they were allowed to sell our security out to our adversaries for personal profit.

Let us, the citizens have full, complete, unrestricted access to an open and frank review of ALL of those emails, those documents, those notes... everything related to the Clinton cartel's (and all others involved) alleged treason. To Clinton's sellout of our world, national, regional, personal security via their emails, phone conversations, documents, etc.

It's time to bring those among us who would dare sell us out, the establishment to its knees. What better place to start than the Clintons and their alleged co-conspirators. But, don't stop there. Drain the friggin' swamp and fill the prisons with the vermin who've made fortunes off of our labors, our hardships.

Drain the swamp and rid it of all of those who made their fortunes at our expense!

WE NEED TERM LIMITS!!! 12 yrs. max., same health care as the rest of us, a nice plaque and letter thanking them for their "service" to our country (if warranted) and a monthly stipend not to exceed $2,000.00 per month for the remainder of their natural life or a simple $35.00 separation check... whichever is warranted, depending on the true quality of their service as determined by us, the voters, their constituents.

IMHO

Those Pesty Hard Drives the Democrats Don't Want Us To Find...

Well, they've been found.

By the FBI in the former home of Imran Awan, an IT expert who was born in Pakistan.

It seems someone tried to destroy them first. Now it seems there's more to these hard drives than previously thought.

And to think the Democrats were shelling out so much money (at least 4 million bucks... allegedly) to the little band of islamic thieves who were allegedly contracted by the Demoncratic National Committee via congresswoman and former DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz.

But then again, it's all "allegations". I'm pretty sure someone, somewhere, some time, somehow will step in and find nothing unusual in this latest mess of botched alleged espionage, etc.

After all, it's nothing more than conducting political business these days. This lying, deceit, treason, espionage... whatever you might want to call it STUFF.

“Imran, Abid and Jamal Awan, Hina Alvi, Natalia Sova and Rao Abbas set up the email accounts and computer systems for dozens of members of Congress and their staffs, and they could read all emails and files on those systems,”

Move along now, nothing to  see here.

IMHO

Now tell me again, Why are we supposed to trust this Mueller dude?

Mueller was selected by that POSPOTUS obummer's crew to quietly and secretly hand off uranium samples to Russian operatives in September, 2009.

In short, obummer colluded with Putin, et. al. to ensure Russia’s two-year quest to obtain a 10-gram sample of the stolen material was realized. Once obummer secured the 10 gram sample from Georgia for Russia, obummer sent Mueller to deliver the goods to Putin's minions. And we have to learn this from WikiLeaks.

Our whole government's gone mad!

Thank the good Lord for WikiLeaks. That seems to be the only way we get the truth these days.

IMHO

POTUS Donald J. Trump was not being investigated!

Per disgraced and fired FBI Director James Comey.

Our POTUS Donald J. Trump, who was recently elected by the American people, was not OFFICIALLY being investigated by the FBI or our recently fired FBI Director James Comey, according to Comey.

But it now appears our POTUS Donald J. Trump actually was being investigated... By Comey.

It's also been revealed to us that our self serving, self important, disgraced-failed-fired FBI Director James Comey leaked a whole bunch of classified, sensitive information to "a friend" who happened to have copious amounts of influence in the mainstream media circles. Comey intentionally copied and knowingly released the information he'd compiled regarding the President Of The United States of America, Donald J. Trump to the "friend" with the sole purpose that the "friend" would get the information "out".

And the friend (or someone) did.

Comey should be in prison pending trial. Why isn't he being held in jail with no bail right now?

IMHO

Comey! Did he violate the Espionage Act?

Comey Admits He Provided Classified Documents To A "Friend" For Future Release...

Giving detailed personal notes relating to a classified discussion with the President Of The United States... notes made subsequent to and regarding an in depth discussion of classified foreign and domestic issues... giving those notes, copious amounts of notes to a personal "friend"... an associate of the "press" with the expressed order to "get these out"... well, isn't that a violation of the Espionage Act?

I mean, I'm no lawyer. I'm certainly not a politico so I wouldn't even begin to know how those breeds would classify or better yet "justify" this treasonous act by Comey. But simple me, I believe it would be a violation of the act.

Though I'm sure there's going to be a whole lot of word and "legal definition" wrestling that will occur before this whole situation is resolved, if it's ever resolved. And you can throw out the "partisan" argument. As a whole, there's virtually no difference between today's republicans and democrats other than party name. 

For the most part our politicos are not "there" to serve "us". They're there to serve themselves, their party, their handlers. Not us.

IMHO

POTUS Donald J. Trump won't invoke Executive Privilege re: Comey's testimony.

If our POTUS Donald J. Trump doesn't want Comey's testimony to be heard then why won't he shut Comey up?!

Take a look for yourself. Maybe this is why!

The liberals would have us all believe they're wholly above the law and above board. We all know better. Any politico... ANY POLITICO who has their mouth open and is speaking is either lying or is thinking about lying on the next sentence if necessary.

Demoncrats, Republicans... any partisan politician tends to lie and/or otherwise deceive their listeners to get the politico's point across.

Our POTUS Donald J. Trump isn't a part of that POLITICO fraternity... yet. He's a businessman, NOT a politico.

But he might turn into one.

I hope not.

The Twenty Second Amendment...

It's under attack!

Remember when Barrack Hussein Obama said the constitution should be treated as a living document and should be susceptible to change? Remember his discussions on this before and during the primaries?

Well, there's a pretty big target of his hidden behind the current veil of those other pesty domestic and global distractions being tossed up in our faces. Those activities taking place in Honduras, North Korea, Iran although serious and in need of attention are not as critical to us as a nation than this latest assault by Obama, et.al. on our freedoms! Neither is the Crap and Trade... err, "cap and trade"... (my error), universal health care, illegal immigrations, financial meltdown, etc.

There's a move afoot by the Obama camp to modify the Twenty Second Amendment:

"Section 1. No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once. But this article shall not apply to any person holding the office of President when this article was proposed by the Congress, and shall not prevent any person who may be holding the office of President, or acting as President, during the term within which this article becomes operative from holding the office of President or acting as President during the remainder of such term.

Section 2. This article shall be inoperative unless it shall have been ratified as an amendment to the Constitution by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States within seven years from the date of its submission to the States by the Congress."

I have a problem with this movement... BIG TIME.

You should too! No wonder Obama went ballistics when Honduras enforced their law and ousted their president for trying to do the very thing Obama's cronies are trying. Honduras, by effectively removing the traitor from office exposed the whole dictatorial scheme to the rest of the world. A dictatorial scheme that has been used to change existing democracies into dictatorial, socialist states now ruled by tyrants and dictators. The very scheme used so effectively by Chavez, Ortega, Castro, Morales, et.al. to strip their country's citizens freedoms from them.

Yes, Obama's outrage has meaning now.

Obama's camp is doing the exact same thing! They're trying to eliminate the President of the United States term limits... quietly, behind our backs. Honduras inadvertently exposed that scheme to us. It all makes sense now why Barry was upset with Honduras yet kept relatively silent about Iran... until pressed.

If the link above doesn't work for you try THIS LINK or simply cut and paste this url "http://www.end22.com/" into your browser. As a fellow American you NEED to read it. Poke around on the site. Give it a good read.

Sure, the proposed changes have been tried before and failed but there's a full court press going on behind the scenes to get it done this time.

If they are successful IT WILL AFFECT YOU!

This must be one of those "major challenges" for Obama during his first year that Biden was referring to. You know, one of those challenges where Obama was going to have to make several "difficult decisions" that wouldn't necessarily sit well with us, the citizens of this fine country.

Well he's right, this isn't sitting well... with me at least!

Obviously, the challenge to Barry is how he and his cronies can get this passed quietly without upsetting us, the citizens too much. Surely they could try to do it by keeping it veiled... much like their amnesty plans, their socialized medicine (squeezing the private insurances out of business), their energy boondoggle, their "no pork" pork, etc...

It appears now that Biden knew full well those challenges, those threats to us and our constitution would be coming from within the United States, from the Oval Office and congress. From the very people we elected to represent us. Silly me, I thought he was thinking more along the lines of threats, challenges, influences that would have had foreign origins. Shame on me!

Shame on you!

This president is downright scary! We're totally screwed if this crap goes through!

Honduras has a cure for tampering with term limits. Maybe we should amend the 22nd. amendment accordingly. Let's have it say something to the effect of Anyone who attempts to increase the term limits of the President of the United States shall be tried for treason, immediately impeached, removed from office and imprisoned as a traitor!

Just thought I'd share this info and my opinion... for what it's worth.

Oh yeah as an aside... while you're out bumping around check out the availability and price of ammunition, primers, powder, bullets and casings in your local area, or for that matter on the internet. From 22's to high caliber.

I have to go for now. I have a new flag and want to get it hung out in front of the house before the 4th.

Take care all and STAY ALERT!