Go figure. Like I had to be told that. Actually, I'm surprised it's not more than 73 percent but then again the figures have to meet a bi-partisan muster and the massaging of the math has to take place before any of these numbers become officially "official" with end notes and qualifying comments of course.
But, here it is in the Washington Times in all of its glory. At least 73% of all terrorist convicts in the United States of America (all that we know of anyways) were born elsewhere, as in "not born in" the United States of America! Hence, it can be argued that at least 73% of all terrorists convicts in the United States of America are foreign terrorists that brought here or are foreign "visitors" or "immigrants" serving time for terrorist acts.
Go figure!
IMHO
#
Showing posts with label terrorists. Show all posts
Showing posts with label terrorists. Show all posts
Wednesday, January 17, 2018
Saturday, November 11, 2017
France? Is It A Defeated Nation?
I'm thinking it is. Though I wish otherwise I'm thinking France has done "it" to itself once again.
It already seems to be decomposing before our very eyes. Though it's not like they've never crumbled like this before. The French, the country of France, they have crumbled several times and the rest of the free world bailed them out several times in the past.
This time though, the French just might have bit off more than they can chew with their embracing of the European Union coupled with the seemingly open door policy the nation has towards immigration. The French government, the people seem to have forgotten or otherwise ignored the recent atrocities that have contributed to their seemingly apparent demise. They've ignored the lessons that could have been learned from the wholesale slaughters of priests, parishioners, citizens, soldiers, police, cartoonists, journalists... freedom.
It appears France's rush to accommodate and enable those who wish to destroy them has finally run its course. France IS being destroyed, AGAIN, from within.
They have only themselves to blame... again.
IMHO
It already seems to be decomposing before our very eyes. Though it's not like they've never crumbled like this before. The French, the country of France, they have crumbled several times and the rest of the free world bailed them out several times in the past.
This time though, the French just might have bit off more than they can chew with their embracing of the European Union coupled with the seemingly open door policy the nation has towards immigration. The French government, the people seem to have forgotten or otherwise ignored the recent atrocities that have contributed to their seemingly apparent demise. They've ignored the lessons that could have been learned from the wholesale slaughters of priests, parishioners, citizens, soldiers, police, cartoonists, journalists... freedom.
It appears France's rush to accommodate and enable those who wish to destroy them has finally run its course. France IS being destroyed, AGAIN, from within.
They have only themselves to blame... again.
IMHO
Saturday, November 04, 2017
Murder My Citizens?!
A frank comparison of two ideologies.
...nope, those days are behind us. I'm protecting what's mine and I'm keeping my guns... loaded and ready.
Thursday, September 21, 2017
More About Terror and the European Union
But in essence this is more about the state of our global security and societal sanity. That given, let's get started...
Members of the European Union have clipped the wings of their existing Intelligence agencies, respectively to the level of borderline "inept-ness". Frustration runs rampant within the rank and file of the law enforcement and intelligence agencies. At least, that's my perspective.
To put it into very general terms, these agencies are designed to gather information that might be counter productive to their nation's (at least) or their multi national region's (at best) best interests. That's a very simplistic take on their duties but it should suffice for the sake of this discussion.
The forbidden word "profile" and the verboten yet productive practice of "profiling" pukes, terrorists, bad guys, WHATEVER... has, well, rendered the local, regional, national and global intelligence industry AND the respective law enforcement industry's capabilities to detect and prevent crimes before they happen, ineffective.
I admit AND agree there should be a line drawn when "profiling" individuals, groups, activities gets out of hand but don't take the tool out of the tool box. You cripple the industry, you cripple our very security when you do. Punish those who knowingly abused their authority. Educate those who were truly ignorant.
Rather than prohibit the tool to be used by the industry simply teach the apprentice or the journeyman how to use that tool properly, legally, effectively and let them do their job!
Law enforcement and Intelligence agencies simply can't do their jobs when they can't incorporate the very statistics their respective industries gather and provide into their respective "investigations"... the historical data at least. They can't effectively complete their tasks at hand and they can't effectively protect those who they're sworn to protect.
In essence our global "society" has diluted our intelligence and law enforcement organizations to the point where they've become nothing more than a re-active clean-up crew (at best). Responding after the incident's started. The intelligence and law enforcement organizations can't effectively predict trends, events that run contrary to social norms let alone track them! after they occur! At least not as thoroughly as they did in the past.
Personally and professionally I realized that it's more productive if our law enforcement, our intelligence organizations proactively work the "trends" and take APPROPRIATE action before the events occur rather than collect the bodies, statistics and other data AFTER THE FACT!
When law enforcement and intelligence folks are "pro-active" they tend to prevent things from happening, or at least they help to reduce the carnage. When they're "re-active" they serve to help clean up the mess, determine responsibility and hunt the bad guy(s) down to prevent more carnage. Unfortunately, quite often during the "re-active" process more damage, carnage occurs. When law enforcement and intelligence agencies are reduced to becoming a reactive element in the protection of our society they've been rendered ineffective. At least from the "prevention" standpoint which, quite frankly I'd personally prefer over the "enforcement" or "re-active" alternative.
I don't understand why we won't accept the fact that we need eyes and ears out "there" for our protection. Why are we blinding and deafening them? Why are we rendering those who we've empowered to protect us, to serve us, to police us... why are we rendering them to be essentially nothing more than a reactive clean up crew?!
Again, that's just my take on things. I've been known to be wrong in the past about many things. For what it's worth.
IMHO
Members of the European Union have clipped the wings of their existing Intelligence agencies, respectively to the level of borderline "inept-ness". Frustration runs rampant within the rank and file of the law enforcement and intelligence agencies. At least, that's my perspective.
To put it into very general terms, these agencies are designed to gather information that might be counter productive to their nation's (at least) or their multi national region's (at best) best interests. That's a very simplistic take on their duties but it should suffice for the sake of this discussion.
The forbidden word "profile" and the verboten yet productive practice of "profiling" pukes, terrorists, bad guys, WHATEVER... has, well, rendered the local, regional, national and global intelligence industry AND the respective law enforcement industry's capabilities to detect and prevent crimes before they happen, ineffective.
I admit AND agree there should be a line drawn when "profiling" individuals, groups, activities gets out of hand but don't take the tool out of the tool box. You cripple the industry, you cripple our very security when you do. Punish those who knowingly abused their authority. Educate those who were truly ignorant.
Rather than prohibit the tool to be used by the industry simply teach the apprentice or the journeyman how to use that tool properly, legally, effectively and let them do their job!
Law enforcement and Intelligence agencies simply can't do their jobs when they can't incorporate the very statistics their respective industries gather and provide into their respective "investigations"... the historical data at least. They can't effectively complete their tasks at hand and they can't effectively protect those who they're sworn to protect.
In essence our global "society" has diluted our intelligence and law enforcement organizations to the point where they've become nothing more than a re-active clean-up crew (at best). Responding after the incident's started. The intelligence and law enforcement organizations can't effectively predict trends, events that run contrary to social norms let alone track them! after they occur! At least not as thoroughly as they did in the past.
Personally and professionally I realized that it's more productive if our law enforcement, our intelligence organizations proactively work the "trends" and take APPROPRIATE action before the events occur rather than collect the bodies, statistics and other data AFTER THE FACT!
When law enforcement and intelligence folks are "pro-active" they tend to prevent things from happening, or at least they help to reduce the carnage. When they're "re-active" they serve to help clean up the mess, determine responsibility and hunt the bad guy(s) down to prevent more carnage. Unfortunately, quite often during the "re-active" process more damage, carnage occurs. When law enforcement and intelligence agencies are reduced to becoming a reactive element in the protection of our society they've been rendered ineffective. At least from the "prevention" standpoint which, quite frankly I'd personally prefer over the "enforcement" or "re-active" alternative.
I don't understand why we won't accept the fact that we need eyes and ears out "there" for our protection. Why are we blinding and deafening them? Why are we rendering those who we've empowered to protect us, to serve us, to police us... why are we rendering them to be essentially nothing more than a reactive clean up crew?!
Again, that's just my take on things. I've been known to be wrong in the past about many things. For what it's worth.
IMHO
Thursday, August 03, 2017
Europe is falling and no one seems to care.
"What seems not to be understood about "the religion of peace" is that "peace" comes only after the entire world has been converted to Islam so that a "Dar al-Harb", the "Abode of War," will no longer even exist."
And that seems to be the whole idea behind the cult of islam... world domination. Submit or die.
The United Kingdom has become a haven for terrorists. Or so it seems.
Don't worry my cult of islam fans here in North America, there will be a day when you too can realize your failed lust for global conquest was a poor decision, at best. In the meantime, keep a watchful eye out for us infidels.
It's only a matter of time before daesh meets us infidels on the home front if things don't change soon... real soon.
IMHO
And that seems to be the whole idea behind the cult of islam... world domination. Submit or die.
The United Kingdom has become a haven for terrorists. Or so it seems.
Don't worry my cult of islam fans here in North America, there will be a day when you too can realize your failed lust for global conquest was a poor decision, at best. In the meantime, keep a watchful eye out for us infidels.
It's only a matter of time before daesh meets us infidels on the home front if things don't change soon... real soon.
IMHO
Sunday, July 23, 2017
From our POTUS Donald J. Trump's speech he recently gave in
Saudi Arabia while discussing islum and terrorism.
There's absolutely no need to remove those adversely affected by terrorism, islam from their native environments. Quite often over the past decades I've suggested we protect them in place and provide the care, logistics, support they need to survive and eventually overcome their challenges at hand, whatever those might be. Let them do it in place, primarily on their own but with some oversight, support, help so they can maintain their dignity and obtain and maintain the quality of life they truly prefer.
I never understood the practice of ripping folks from their native lands, their homes, their lives simply to move them to a foreign environment thousands of miles away so they can dwell on their woes and wonder what's going to happen to them next. They're unfamiliar with everything associated with the move. They're immediately alienated and they're wholly uncomfortable.
Aiding them in place provides a heightened sense of ownership, loyalty, patriotism to their cause, their very existence.
Our POTUS Donald J. Trump is "spot on" here!
IMHO
"I also applaud Jordan, Turkey and Lebanon for their role in hosting refugees. The surge of migrants and refugees leaving the Middle East depletes the human capital needed to build stable societies and economies. Instead of depriving this region of so much human potential, Middle Eastern countries can give young people hope for a brighter future in their home nations and regions."I've been saying this for years.
There's absolutely no need to remove those adversely affected by terrorism, islam from their native environments. Quite often over the past decades I've suggested we protect them in place and provide the care, logistics, support they need to survive and eventually overcome their challenges at hand, whatever those might be. Let them do it in place, primarily on their own but with some oversight, support, help so they can maintain their dignity and obtain and maintain the quality of life they truly prefer.
I never understood the practice of ripping folks from their native lands, their homes, their lives simply to move them to a foreign environment thousands of miles away so they can dwell on their woes and wonder what's going to happen to them next. They're unfamiliar with everything associated with the move. They're immediately alienated and they're wholly uncomfortable.
Aiding them in place provides a heightened sense of ownership, loyalty, patriotism to their cause, their very existence.
Our POTUS Donald J. Trump is "spot on" here!
IMHO
Saturday, July 01, 2017
Even the victim of the "Hate Crime" says it wasn't a hate crime.
The muslim woman who was attacked simply for being a muslim by an unknown hispanic male while she was walking home from her mosque? The poor woman who became the poster child for the "anti-muslim" rhetoric that we're all being accused of harboring in our grand old U. S. of A. thanks to a very creative, active press pool?
Yeah, THAT poor, defenseless muslim woman!
Well, it seems someone failed to mention that she wasn't attacked because she was a muslim. But it sounded good, it sold air time, newspapers so the press ran with the whole "anti-muslim" excuse anyways. Even when the victim claims the attack on her was unrelated to her being a muslim.
Her attorney wants it to be related to the fact that she is a muslim. He wants it to be the reason for the attack against her so bad that he's willing to discredit her statements (yes, statements... as in more than one) where she claimed to the investigators that her being a muslim wasn't the reason for the attack against her.
Yet, the press ran with what her attorney gave them rather than what she told the police. The anti-muslim claim fit the attorney's and the islamic community's agendas much better than the real reason so they ran to the press with it and the press? Well, they ran with it too. It sounded "better" to them. It must have... they elected to run with fiction over fact. But then again, this is our modern press.
The victim? She knew and still knows the real reason she was attacked. It's the same reason she told the investigators the day of and several times after the attack. She's not having any part of it being an anti muslim thing.
She told the investigators several times that she wasn't attacked because she's a muslim. She even provided multiple statements claiming the attack had nothing to do with her being a muslim. She believed it had everything to do with her refusal to accept the fact that her daughter entered into a lesbian relationship. A shitrea crime that's wholly against the cult of islam's "beliefs" a shitrea crime that is punishable by death. Most likely stoning.
Nope, the victim claims it WAS NOT A HATE CRIME in spite of what her muslim attorney, Munjed Ahmad, a board member for American muslims for Palestine with connections to Hamas has told her to say, or so it seems.
She doesn't seem to want to follow the script she was given by her muslim attorney.
It wasn't a hate crime. It was most likely an assault related to a domestic issue between her daughter, her son in law and her. And the press and the "attorney" want us to believe otherwise so they can continue to feed their agendas.
IMHO
Yeah, THAT poor, defenseless muslim woman!
Well, it seems someone failed to mention that she wasn't attacked because she was a muslim. But it sounded good, it sold air time, newspapers so the press ran with the whole "anti-muslim" excuse anyways. Even when the victim claims the attack on her was unrelated to her being a muslim.
Her attorney wants it to be related to the fact that she is a muslim. He wants it to be the reason for the attack against her so bad that he's willing to discredit her statements (yes, statements... as in more than one) where she claimed to the investigators that her being a muslim wasn't the reason for the attack against her.
Yet, the press ran with what her attorney gave them rather than what she told the police. The anti-muslim claim fit the attorney's and the islamic community's agendas much better than the real reason so they ran to the press with it and the press? Well, they ran with it too. It sounded "better" to them. It must have... they elected to run with fiction over fact. But then again, this is our modern press.
The victim? She knew and still knows the real reason she was attacked. It's the same reason she told the investigators the day of and several times after the attack. She's not having any part of it being an anti muslim thing.
She told the investigators several times that she wasn't attacked because she's a muslim. She even provided multiple statements claiming the attack had nothing to do with her being a muslim. She believed it had everything to do with her refusal to accept the fact that her daughter entered into a lesbian relationship. A shitrea crime that's wholly against the cult of islam's "beliefs" a shitrea crime that is punishable by death. Most likely stoning.
Nope, the victim claims it WAS NOT A HATE CRIME in spite of what her muslim attorney, Munjed Ahmad, a board member for American muslims for Palestine with connections to Hamas has told her to say, or so it seems.
She doesn't seem to want to follow the script she was given by her muslim attorney.
It wasn't a hate crime. It was most likely an assault related to a domestic issue between her daughter, her son in law and her. And the press and the "attorney" want us to believe otherwise so they can continue to feed their agendas.
IMHO
Monday, June 26, 2017
YouTube and Google. Are they the daesh terrorists latest accomplices to share islamic terror?
Google and YouTube. They are evidently two other outlets that provide a platform for ISIS, ISIL, daesh... ISLAM. Let's call them daesh. These daesh animals, they're proud of their slaughter of innocents.
These videos, this information comes to us compliments of You Tube, Google and islam, the religion of peace. All acting in concert.
You Tube and Google terror. A place to show the world what terror looks like.
I'm not thinking this islam stuff is all as peaceful as it's been cracked up to be. Not at all! Not nearly!
But then again, I'm a Western Christian, educated man with Western values. I have a profound appreciation of humanity and support a deserved peace. Evidently YouTube and Google don't. They're making too much blood money from daesh, et. al. to evidently give a damn about humanity.
IMHO
These videos, this information comes to us compliments of You Tube, Google and islam, the religion of peace. All acting in concert.
You Tube and Google terror. A place to show the world what terror looks like.
I'm not thinking this islam stuff is all as peaceful as it's been cracked up to be. Not at all! Not nearly!
But then again, I'm a Western Christian, educated man with Western values. I have a profound appreciation of humanity and support a deserved peace. Evidently YouTube and Google don't. They're making too much blood money from daesh, et. al. to evidently give a damn about humanity.
IMHO
SCOTUS supports POTUS Trump's Travel Ban
It's a travel ban and it's for our protection. The demoncrats and the rest of the flaming libs must think bringing folks who want to kill us, want to destroy our existence is a good thing. It's not.
The travel ban that our POTUS Donald J. Trump proposed has been upheld by the SCOTUS.
Parts of it anyways.
That's a start!
POTUS Trump is doing nothing more than trying to make our country safe again. And the left runs amok, compromising our safety, security for their political gain.
Ban travel from those countries who wish to destroy us. PERIOD. If their citizens wish refuge and seek refuge then let's help them refuge safely in place in their own countries!
Or at least their own REGIONS of the world.
IMHO
The travel ban that our POTUS Donald J. Trump proposed has been upheld by the SCOTUS.
Parts of it anyways.
That's a start!
POTUS Trump is doing nothing more than trying to make our country safe again. And the left runs amok, compromising our safety, security for their political gain.
Ban travel from those countries who wish to destroy us. PERIOD. If their citizens wish refuge and seek refuge then let's help them refuge safely in place in their own countries!
Or at least their own REGIONS of the world.
IMHO
Friday, June 16, 2017
We need to face terrorism and exterminate it!
This should be a given... A civilized, reasonable, sane society should not embrace nor enable terrorists, terrorism or those who wish to destroy them! Yet, too many nations suggest we be more accommodating to these "extremist" groups, these "terrorists"!
This should not be happening!
"The right place for a terrorist is a prison cell. The right place for a foreign terrorist is a foreign prison cell far away from Britain."... or any other country that won't tolerate terror.
Identify, arrest, detain and if applicable destroy any domestic or foreign terrorists encountered. If they're foreigners, deal with them accordingly and in the most practical way, erring in favor of the general public!
IMHO
This should not be happening!
"The right place for a terrorist is a prison cell. The right place for a foreign terrorist is a foreign prison cell far away from Britain."... or any other country that won't tolerate terror.
Identify, arrest, detain and if applicable destroy any domestic or foreign terrorists encountered. If they're foreigners, deal with them accordingly and in the most practical way, erring in favor of the general public!
IMHO
Friday, June 09, 2017
Obama sent terrorists to Qatar in trade for a traitor.
Obama's 2014 trade for Bergdahl included the release of five daesh terrorists back onto the battlefields to fight against us and our allies.
obummer had to know that was going to happen. He was and still is no friend of us, of our nation.
That POSPOTUS obummer sent terrorists to Qatar to pick up where they left off.
I wish we could turn back time. I'd love to see obummer in prison orange.
IMHO
obummer had to know that was going to happen. He was and still is no friend of us, of our nation.
That POSPOTUS obummer sent terrorists to Qatar to pick up where they left off.
I wish we could turn back time. I'd love to see obummer in prison orange.
IMHO
Thursday, June 08, 2017
Islam's month of Ramadan, 2017.
The month of Ramadan. If you're one of that Religion of Peace crowd you're setting new records. It evidently is going well for them and just might be a new record of accomplishments.
They must be proud. The appeasers in Europe have given them incentive.
Check it out!
They're on a roll. Yeah, right. Religion of peace my arse!
It's beyond me how folks can condone this B.S. and even worse, how they can call it a "religion"! But then again, I'm a pork chop munching, bacon loving infidel and am very proud of that fact.
IMHO
They must be proud. The appeasers in Europe have given them incentive.
Check it out!
They're on a roll. Yeah, right. Religion of peace my arse!
It's beyond me how folks can condone this B.S. and even worse, how they can call it a "religion"! But then again, I'm a pork chop munching, bacon loving infidel and am very proud of that fact.
IMHO
Sunday, June 04, 2017
And Speaking of London's mooslum Mayor...
This mooslum fool criticizes our POTUS Donald J. Trump for speaking out against terrorism.
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/06/angry-london-muslim-mayor-lashes-latest-islamist-attack-trump/
Yet another failure on London's mayor Sadiaq Khan's part.
Or is it? Isn't he just trying to enable his fellow muslims, their soldiers, their horde to create the latest caliphate, London? Or better yet Great Britain?!
He's just another pawn in this whole mooslum theme.
IMHO
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/06/angry-london-muslim-mayor-lashes-latest-islamist-attack-trump/
Yet another failure on London's mayor Sadiaq Khan's part.
Or is it? Isn't he just trying to enable his fellow muslims, their soldiers, their horde to create the latest caliphate, London? Or better yet Great Britain?!
He's just another pawn in this whole mooslum theme.
IMHO
Saturday, November 03, 2012
Obummer's Benghazi failures kills 4 heroes!
As a father, brother, grandfather, uncle, neighbor, friend, citizen! As an American veteran I'm PISSED OFF! I'm mad as hell at this POS who's occupying our White House!
Here's why!
From The Canada Free Press is this fantastic yet tragically sad article authored by Claudia Rosett. 7 hours of terror, 4 dead heroes later because a cowering, stuttering, stammering, lying, self serving president never stepped in to help!
Revealing! She's big on the questions and obama, et. al. are short on their answers! They need to account for their Benghazi failures that resulted in the massacre of these four American HEROES!
There's ample evidence that these men died as a direct result of obummer's and his staff's absolute failure to appropriately respond to a known terrorist threat! The POTUS and his staff were forewarned, were contacted several times over the 7 hours of fighting and denied any support to those on the ground who were heroically protecting our sovereign American soil in Libya.
obama's priorities were clearly established that night when these HEROES gave their lives! This POS obummer traveled to Nevada so he could continue campaigning for four more years of self service, lies and failures rather than stand by and send the HEROES the help they needed.
Read the article below or go to The Canada Free Press to get the full version.
Benghazi and the Missing Obama 9/11 Timeline
Where exactly was President Obama during those seven hours, 5 PM till midnight in Washington, on Sept. 11?
By Claudia Rosett Saturday, November 3, 2012
The story of the Sept. 11 terrorist attack in Benghazi has been evolving for more than seven weeks now, in its many and oft conflicting variants, and the questions keep multiplying. Amid the official obfuscations and evasions, a patchwork picture has been emerging, by way of congressional questions, leaked emails, anonymous sources and documents discovered as recently as this week by reporters wandering through the still-unsecured, burned and looted diplomatic compound where Ambassador Chris Stevens apparently spent his final moments of consciousness choking on the smoke of a diesel-fueled conflagration.
Among the vital tools for clarifying what actually happened are the timelines, which are only slowly being filled in. Broadly, these stretch back months before the assault, as American personnel in Libya warned about deteriorating security, and a U.S. administration invested in the tale of al Qaeda-in-retreat, success in Libya, and a receding tide of war, chose to ignore the warnings.
The timelines stretch forward as well, encompassing confusing and conflicting accounts put forth by various officials of the administration; the Sept. 16 televised blame-the-video-and-the-spontaneous-mob messages of the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, Susan Rice, and the Sept. 25 denounce-the-video speech of President Obama at the UN; the reported inability of the FBI to reach the Benghazi sites until more than three weeks after the attack; the continuing controversy about reported calls for help and the alleged orders to stand down. The list goes on.
But of special interest, in getting a handle on the truth, are the timelines for the duration of the attack itself. There are at least two provided by the administration at this stage. One comes from the State Department, outlined in a teleconferencebackground press briefing on Oct. 9. The other was provided this past Thursday by the CIA. They don’t quite match up. Both versions agree that the assault on the main diplomatic compound began at 9:40 PM Benghazi time, and that a rescue squad came from the annex about a mile away, was unable to find the ambassador, retrieved the body of diplomatic aide Sean Smith, and then returned, under fire, to the annex — which itself came under attack, and where, in the early morning hours, former SEALS Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods were killed by a mortar strike.
But when the rescue squad returns to the annex that deadly night, accounts diverge. According to the State Department briefer, the attack on the annex continued, at least sporadically, for hours — from the time the rescue team returned, until the time the two agents were killed. The wording in the State Department Oct. 9 transcript , referring to the time the rescue team arrived back at the annex, is: “The annex is at this time also taking fire and does take fire intermittently, on and off, for the next several hours. The fire consists of AK-47s, but also RPGs, and it’s, at times, quite intense.”
The CIA version, as reported Nov. 1, by David Ignatius in the Washington Post, is different. According to the CIA, the attacks on the annex “stop at 1:01 A.M., and some assume the fight is over.” Then, more than four hours later, at 5:15 AM, “A new Libyan assault begins, this time with mortars.” That’s the attack in which Woods and Doherty are killed. It stops just 11 minutes later. At 6 AM, a large Libyan security escort finally shows up, takes the Americans to the airport, where some of them, including the wounded, fly out at 7 AM, and the rest depart at 10 AM, with the bodies of the four murdered Americans.
Plenty remains to be filled in and reconciled between these overlapping timelines. But the glaring omission to date is the timeline back in Washington for the commander-in-chief, the president himself. The critical interval in Benghazi spanned just over 12 hours, from the time the attack began, at 9:40 PM on Sept. 11, until the last contingent of Americans flew out, at 10 AM the next day, Benghazi is in a time zone six hours ahead of Washington. So, in Washington, that critical 12-hour interval ran from 3:40 PM, Sept. 11, until about 4 AM, Sept. 12.
What was the President doing during those 12 hours? The official White House schedule for Sept. 11 tells us he had been to a memorial service at the Pentagon that morning, then visited the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center at 2:15 PM, returning at 4:50 PM to the White House for a previously scheduled meeting at 5:00 PM with Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta. The White House has said that Obama was informed at about 5 PM of the attack in Benghazi. Did no one on his staff try to inform him sooner? By then, the diplomatic post had already been under attack for well over an hour. It was 11 PM in Benghazi, where a rescue squad from the annex had arrived at the burning diplomatic compound and was trying, without success, to reach Ambassador Stevens amid the intense fire and smoke.
The White House schedule for that week shows nothing for the president after that 5 PM meeting on Sept. 11, at which time he reportedly got word of the attack. The next item for the president, as now recorded in the White House schedule, was his appearance at 10:35 the next morning, Sept. 12, when he delivered a statement in the Rose Garden, deploring the deaths of the four Americans, while implying that some sort of deliberate third-party offense (the video) had provoked the attack (“While the United States rejects efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others…”).
Between 5 PM, when the president was informed of the attack, and 10:35 AM, when Obama delivered that public statement, there was an interval of more than 17 hours. When was he directly following the events in Benghazi, complete with the claim and appearance of the heavily armed terrorists of Ansar al-Sharia? When did he go to sleep? When was he informed of the death of the ambassador? During the first six-and-a-half of those hours, from 5 PM until about 11:30 PM Washington time, the American personnel on the ground in Benghazi were either under attack (intermittent, and at times intense, for hours, if you believe the State Department; or with a pause of about four hours — though with nothing definitively resolved, and the ambassador presumed dead but not yet back in American hands — if you believe the CIA). And during the first 11 of those hours, until 4 AM Washington time, there were still Americans, in peril, on the ground in Benghazi.
What was the president doing during those many hours? There are various accounts now circulating of what his staff did, or perhaps did not do. But for the president himself, there’s a big blank. The White House, which has released photos of Obama monitoring everything from the raid on Osama bin Laden to the natural disaster of Hurricane Sandy, has released no photos of Obama at his post on the evening of the Sept. 11 attack in Benghazi.
In an interview weeks later, on Oct 27, with a Colorado TV reporter who pressed questions about Benghazi, Obama said, “The minute I found out what was happening, I gave three very clear directives.” These directives, he said, were to investigate what happened, to bring the perpetrators to justice, and — presumably the most urgent while the battle itself was still underway — “make sure we are securing our personnel and doing whatever we need to.” But that was about all he was willing to say.
Obama’s immediate dispensing of a directive (though, as Bing West has noted, we have yet to see any documentary evidence of it) accounts for the time just after 5 PM. What did Obama do for the rest of that evening, as Libyans found a dying ambassador in the ravaged diplomatic compound, and took him to a Benghazi hospital; as the outgunned Americans in Benghazi took up defensive positions at the annex?
By the CIA account, CIA reinforcements flew in on a hastily chartered plane from Tripoli, arriving at 1:15 AM at the Benghazi airport, but were then delayed till 4:30 AM– for more than three hours — over logistical problems that included having to negotiate with Libyan authorities for permission to leave the airport. The corresponding time in Washington was 7:15 – 10:30 PM. Given the urgency of the moment, including the torched diplomatic compound, the assault on the annex and the missing ambassador, was this not perhaps an interlude in which direct intervention by the president of the United States, perhaps a phone call to the right official in Libya, might have hastened things along? For that matter, wasn’t this a period during which greater firepower could have been dispatched to Benghazi from U.S. bases outside the country?
As it turned out, when the reinforcements finally got past the airport, they were unable to retrieve the body of Ambassador Stevens from the hospital, because, according to the CIA, the hospital was surrounded by the al-Qaeda-linked Ansar al-Sharia terrorists who — as the State Department informed the White House in an email sent at 6:07 PM that evening — had already taken credit, on Facebook, for the attack. Was the president, whose envoy had disappeared in a fiery battle in Benghazi, not available to follow these developments while they were playing out? For that matter, did no one brief him on it before his UN ambassador went on the TV talk shows five days later to blame the assault on a spontaneous mob enraged by a video?
And, as we now know, just before 11:30 PM (CIA timeline), Washington time, one of the CIA reinforcements, Glen Doherty, was killed, along with Woods, at the Benghazi annex. Following that strike, the survivors, with the bodies of three of the four American dead, then waited for another half hour before friendly Libyan forces finally arrived, in strength — midnight, Washington time — to escort them to the airport. If it now seems safe to record, with hindsight, that the attack stopped after that lethal bombardment, did anyone have reason to be sure at the time that it was really over?
Where exactly was President Obama during those seven hours, 5 PM till midnight in Washington, on Sept. 11? He had no further appointments scheduled. He has released no pictures, provided no specifics. Was he in the situation room throughout? After the 5 PM directive, was he there at all? There are many questions about what orders did or did not issue from the White House, and who gave them, or didn’t, during the Sept. 11 Benghazi attack. But they all lead back to the president. He’s the commander-in-chief, as he reminded the country on Thursday, while campaigning in his Air Force One bomber jacket.
On a normal evening, there may be no call for the American public to know exactly what their president does with his time. But this was no normal evening. This was a terrorist attack, on the anniversary of Sept. 11, in which an al Qaeda affiliate, claiming credit, was so visible on the ground as to deter CIA agents from approaching a hospital to retrieve the body of the first American ambassador to be murdered since the administration of President Jimmy Carter.
All we have of the timeline for Obama himself during these events is that he met with the Secretary of Defense and a number of other senior officials at 5 PM, Sept. 11. He gave a somewhat odd statement in the Rose Garden at 10:35 the next morning. He then dropped by the State Department. And at 2:05 he left he left the White House for a campaign trip to Las Vegas. When do we see the rest of the President Obama 9/11 timeline?
Claudia Rosett is a journalist-in-residence with the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies.
Read her blog, at Claudia Rosett.
Claudia can be reached at claudiarosett@hotmail.com
Here's why!
From The Canada Free Press is this fantastic yet tragically sad article authored by Claudia Rosett. 7 hours of terror, 4 dead heroes later because a cowering, stuttering, stammering, lying, self serving president never stepped in to help!
Revealing! She's big on the questions and obama, et. al. are short on their answers! They need to account for their Benghazi failures that resulted in the massacre of these four American HEROES!
There's ample evidence that these men died as a direct result of obummer's and his staff's absolute failure to appropriately respond to a known terrorist threat! The POTUS and his staff were forewarned, were contacted several times over the 7 hours of fighting and denied any support to those on the ground who were heroically protecting our sovereign American soil in Libya.
obama's priorities were clearly established that night when these HEROES gave their lives! This POS obummer traveled to Nevada so he could continue campaigning for four more years of self service, lies and failures rather than stand by and send the HEROES the help they needed.
Read the article below or go to The Canada Free Press to get the full version.
Benghazi and the Missing Obama 9/11 Timeline
Where exactly was President Obama during those seven hours, 5 PM till midnight in Washington, on Sept. 11?
By Claudia Rosett Saturday, November 3, 2012
The story of the Sept. 11 terrorist attack in Benghazi has been evolving for more than seven weeks now, in its many and oft conflicting variants, and the questions keep multiplying. Amid the official obfuscations and evasions, a patchwork picture has been emerging, by way of congressional questions, leaked emails, anonymous sources and documents discovered as recently as this week by reporters wandering through the still-unsecured, burned and looted diplomatic compound where Ambassador Chris Stevens apparently spent his final moments of consciousness choking on the smoke of a diesel-fueled conflagration.
Among the vital tools for clarifying what actually happened are the timelines, which are only slowly being filled in. Broadly, these stretch back months before the assault, as American personnel in Libya warned about deteriorating security, and a U.S. administration invested in the tale of al Qaeda-in-retreat, success in Libya, and a receding tide of war, chose to ignore the warnings.
The timelines stretch forward as well, encompassing confusing and conflicting accounts put forth by various officials of the administration; the Sept. 16 televised blame-the-video-and-the-spontaneous-mob messages of the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, Susan Rice, and the Sept. 25 denounce-the-video speech of President Obama at the UN; the reported inability of the FBI to reach the Benghazi sites until more than three weeks after the attack; the continuing controversy about reported calls for help and the alleged orders to stand down. The list goes on.
But of special interest, in getting a handle on the truth, are the timelines for the duration of the attack itself. There are at least two provided by the administration at this stage. One comes from the State Department, outlined in a teleconferencebackground press briefing on Oct. 9. The other was provided this past Thursday by the CIA. They don’t quite match up. Both versions agree that the assault on the main diplomatic compound began at 9:40 PM Benghazi time, and that a rescue squad came from the annex about a mile away, was unable to find the ambassador, retrieved the body of diplomatic aide Sean Smith, and then returned, under fire, to the annex — which itself came under attack, and where, in the early morning hours, former SEALS Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods were killed by a mortar strike.
But when the rescue squad returns to the annex that deadly night, accounts diverge. According to the State Department briefer, the attack on the annex continued, at least sporadically, for hours — from the time the rescue team returned, until the time the two agents were killed. The wording in the State Department Oct. 9 transcript , referring to the time the rescue team arrived back at the annex, is: “The annex is at this time also taking fire and does take fire intermittently, on and off, for the next several hours. The fire consists of AK-47s, but also RPGs, and it’s, at times, quite intense.”
The CIA version, as reported Nov. 1, by David Ignatius in the Washington Post, is different. According to the CIA, the attacks on the annex “stop at 1:01 A.M., and some assume the fight is over.” Then, more than four hours later, at 5:15 AM, “A new Libyan assault begins, this time with mortars.” That’s the attack in which Woods and Doherty are killed. It stops just 11 minutes later. At 6 AM, a large Libyan security escort finally shows up, takes the Americans to the airport, where some of them, including the wounded, fly out at 7 AM, and the rest depart at 10 AM, with the bodies of the four murdered Americans.
Plenty remains to be filled in and reconciled between these overlapping timelines. But the glaring omission to date is the timeline back in Washington for the commander-in-chief, the president himself. The critical interval in Benghazi spanned just over 12 hours, from the time the attack began, at 9:40 PM on Sept. 11, until the last contingent of Americans flew out, at 10 AM the next day, Benghazi is in a time zone six hours ahead of Washington. So, in Washington, that critical 12-hour interval ran from 3:40 PM, Sept. 11, until about 4 AM, Sept. 12.
What was the President doing during those 12 hours? The official White House schedule for Sept. 11 tells us he had been to a memorial service at the Pentagon that morning, then visited the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center at 2:15 PM, returning at 4:50 PM to the White House for a previously scheduled meeting at 5:00 PM with Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta. The White House has said that Obama was informed at about 5 PM of the attack in Benghazi. Did no one on his staff try to inform him sooner? By then, the diplomatic post had already been under attack for well over an hour. It was 11 PM in Benghazi, where a rescue squad from the annex had arrived at the burning diplomatic compound and was trying, without success, to reach Ambassador Stevens amid the intense fire and smoke.
The White House schedule for that week shows nothing for the president after that 5 PM meeting on Sept. 11, at which time he reportedly got word of the attack. The next item for the president, as now recorded in the White House schedule, was his appearance at 10:35 the next morning, Sept. 12, when he delivered a statement in the Rose Garden, deploring the deaths of the four Americans, while implying that some sort of deliberate third-party offense (the video) had provoked the attack (“While the United States rejects efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others…”).
Between 5 PM, when the president was informed of the attack, and 10:35 AM, when Obama delivered that public statement, there was an interval of more than 17 hours. When was he directly following the events in Benghazi, complete with the claim and appearance of the heavily armed terrorists of Ansar al-Sharia? When did he go to sleep? When was he informed of the death of the ambassador? During the first six-and-a-half of those hours, from 5 PM until about 11:30 PM Washington time, the American personnel on the ground in Benghazi were either under attack (intermittent, and at times intense, for hours, if you believe the State Department; or with a pause of about four hours — though with nothing definitively resolved, and the ambassador presumed dead but not yet back in American hands — if you believe the CIA). And during the first 11 of those hours, until 4 AM Washington time, there were still Americans, in peril, on the ground in Benghazi.
What was the president doing during those many hours? There are various accounts now circulating of what his staff did, or perhaps did not do. But for the president himself, there’s a big blank. The White House, which has released photos of Obama monitoring everything from the raid on Osama bin Laden to the natural disaster of Hurricane Sandy, has released no photos of Obama at his post on the evening of the Sept. 11 attack in Benghazi.
In an interview weeks later, on Oct 27, with a Colorado TV reporter who pressed questions about Benghazi, Obama said, “The minute I found out what was happening, I gave three very clear directives.” These directives, he said, were to investigate what happened, to bring the perpetrators to justice, and — presumably the most urgent while the battle itself was still underway — “make sure we are securing our personnel and doing whatever we need to.” But that was about all he was willing to say.
Obama’s immediate dispensing of a directive (though, as Bing West has noted, we have yet to see any documentary evidence of it) accounts for the time just after 5 PM. What did Obama do for the rest of that evening, as Libyans found a dying ambassador in the ravaged diplomatic compound, and took him to a Benghazi hospital; as the outgunned Americans in Benghazi took up defensive positions at the annex?
By the CIA account, CIA reinforcements flew in on a hastily chartered plane from Tripoli, arriving at 1:15 AM at the Benghazi airport, but were then delayed till 4:30 AM– for more than three hours — over logistical problems that included having to negotiate with Libyan authorities for permission to leave the airport. The corresponding time in Washington was 7:15 – 10:30 PM. Given the urgency of the moment, including the torched diplomatic compound, the assault on the annex and the missing ambassador, was this not perhaps an interlude in which direct intervention by the president of the United States, perhaps a phone call to the right official in Libya, might have hastened things along? For that matter, wasn’t this a period during which greater firepower could have been dispatched to Benghazi from U.S. bases outside the country?
As it turned out, when the reinforcements finally got past the airport, they were unable to retrieve the body of Ambassador Stevens from the hospital, because, according to the CIA, the hospital was surrounded by the al-Qaeda-linked Ansar al-Sharia terrorists who — as the State Department informed the White House in an email sent at 6:07 PM that evening — had already taken credit, on Facebook, for the attack. Was the president, whose envoy had disappeared in a fiery battle in Benghazi, not available to follow these developments while they were playing out? For that matter, did no one brief him on it before his UN ambassador went on the TV talk shows five days later to blame the assault on a spontaneous mob enraged by a video?
And, as we now know, just before 11:30 PM (CIA timeline), Washington time, one of the CIA reinforcements, Glen Doherty, was killed, along with Woods, at the Benghazi annex. Following that strike, the survivors, with the bodies of three of the four American dead, then waited for another half hour before friendly Libyan forces finally arrived, in strength — midnight, Washington time — to escort them to the airport. If it now seems safe to record, with hindsight, that the attack stopped after that lethal bombardment, did anyone have reason to be sure at the time that it was really over?
Where exactly was President Obama during those seven hours, 5 PM till midnight in Washington, on Sept. 11? He had no further appointments scheduled. He has released no pictures, provided no specifics. Was he in the situation room throughout? After the 5 PM directive, was he there at all? There are many questions about what orders did or did not issue from the White House, and who gave them, or didn’t, during the Sept. 11 Benghazi attack. But they all lead back to the president. He’s the commander-in-chief, as he reminded the country on Thursday, while campaigning in his Air Force One bomber jacket.
On a normal evening, there may be no call for the American public to know exactly what their president does with his time. But this was no normal evening. This was a terrorist attack, on the anniversary of Sept. 11, in which an al Qaeda affiliate, claiming credit, was so visible on the ground as to deter CIA agents from approaching a hospital to retrieve the body of the first American ambassador to be murdered since the administration of President Jimmy Carter.
All we have of the timeline for Obama himself during these events is that he met with the Secretary of Defense and a number of other senior officials at 5 PM, Sept. 11. He gave a somewhat odd statement in the Rose Garden at 10:35 the next morning. He then dropped by the State Department. And at 2:05 he left he left the White House for a campaign trip to Las Vegas. When do we see the rest of the President Obama 9/11 timeline?
Claudia Rosett is a journalist-in-residence with the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies.
Read her blog, at Claudia Rosett.
Claudia can be reached at claudiarosett@hotmail.com
Sunday, September 09, 2012
Their tolerance is waning!
Nashville Tennessee mooslum terror threats:
I read this article on Atlas Shrugs about a mooslum woman who not only openly threatened her co-worker but who revealed she and scores of thousands of mooslums are integral parts of a global mooslum movement . This claim has been repeated throughout the globe on many occasions yet “moderates” and the naïve continue to explain it away as nothing but bravado, chest pounding by a very limited number of mooslum extremists.
I say it’s an important and growing trend that needs to be noticed, needs to be addressed. When the bantor, when the threats escalate to the scale they’ve escalated to I believe we need to take notice and some are. If not for some pretty fed up folks out here in our country who overhear the mooslum banter, are berated by the mooslum “moderates”, are the object of mooslum angst we’d be clueless as to what’s in store for us down the road.
Make no mistake about it, so called “moderate” mooslums aren’t wholly moderate! They’re labeled “moderate” by design, by they’re mentors. “Moderate” mooslums are the enablers of the radicals, their “keepers”, their “conscience”, their tempering voice. Moderates cook the books, make the money, pay the tithes so that the radicals can spread their mooslum terror globally.
This religion of peace crap! Really? Tell that to this nice, moderate mooslum who's being publicly caned for the sake of islum. Animals!
We can’t afford to be the sheep any longer. We need to become and remain vigilant, report what we view as suspicious to the appropriate authorities, recognize escalating behaviors, sensibly yet passionately resist any moderate or extremist “bullying”, “belittling” bantor.
Above all we need to immediately report any purported or communicated threats to our safety, freedoms, country, neighbors… our existence from anyone, not just the mooslums. Converts are out there. The weak, the naïve, the ignorant…
IMHO
I read this article on Atlas Shrugs about a mooslum woman who not only openly threatened her co-worker but who revealed she and scores of thousands of mooslums are integral parts of a global mooslum movement . This claim has been repeated throughout the globe on many occasions yet “moderates” and the naïve continue to explain it away as nothing but bravado, chest pounding by a very limited number of mooslum extremists.
I say it’s an important and growing trend that needs to be noticed, needs to be addressed. When the bantor, when the threats escalate to the scale they’ve escalated to I believe we need to take notice and some are. If not for some pretty fed up folks out here in our country who overhear the mooslum banter, are berated by the mooslum “moderates”, are the object of mooslum angst we’d be clueless as to what’s in store for us down the road.
Make no mistake about it, so called “moderate” mooslums aren’t wholly moderate! They’re labeled “moderate” by design, by they’re mentors. “Moderate” mooslums are the enablers of the radicals, their “keepers”, their “conscience”, their tempering voice. Moderates cook the books, make the money, pay the tithes so that the radicals can spread their mooslum terror globally.
This religion of peace crap! Really? Tell that to this nice, moderate mooslum who's being publicly caned for the sake of islum. Animals!
We can’t afford to be the sheep any longer. We need to become and remain vigilant, report what we view as suspicious to the appropriate authorities, recognize escalating behaviors, sensibly yet passionately resist any moderate or extremist “bullying”, “belittling” bantor.
Above all we need to immediately report any purported or communicated threats to our safety, freedoms, country, neighbors… our existence from anyone, not just the mooslums. Converts are out there. The weak, the naïve, the ignorant…
IMHO
Wednesday, April 29, 2009
Ah, Obama sells us out...
...again. All in the interests of appeasement, apology... enablement, the ultimate goal.
Those select, hand chosen, redacted, classified documents obama and his political cronies released to the world last week... You know the ones that allege "torture", immoral conduct, illegal shenanigans perpetrated by president Bush and his administration on those helpless, God fearing, misunderstood clumps of humanity we incarcerated at Gitmo and elsewhere.
Yeah, those documents. Not ALL of them, just some of them... choice documents... redacted documents... documents that serve obama's purpose, documents that individually tell a tiny fraction of the whole story of how this country, we the citizens were kept safe for seven years by the previous administration.
Yup. Those documents. The ones that define torture, define "enhanced" or "harsh" interrogation techniques and afford our protectors to practice these enhanced or harsh interrogation techniques on some folks who were (and most likely still are) hell bent on slaughtering the whole lot of us. They'd slaughter us wholesale if they could... no doubt. Just ask them.
Yep. Those documents that were declassified, released to the "press" and exported to our enemies throughout the world. The ones that go into detail, define the parameters of the business of "enhanced interrogations". The documents that ensure those practitioners of these techniques do not cross the line and stray into the "torture" side of things.
Those very documents that help prepare our protectors for a more humane extraction of information from their subjects than say, well... their Al Qaeda or Taliban or... hmmm... radical muslum counterparts. The documents that define waterboarding, sleep deprivation, humiliation, face "slapping" as the type of "torture" applied to me and other soldiers decades ago when we were in this fine country's military and being trained on resisting minimal interrogation techniques commonly practiced by "civilized" nations.
Those documents that define "enhanced interrogation techniques" not necessarily practiced by our "enemy" at the time... the North Vietnamese (and their allies... uh hum... Soviets, Chinese, etc.) because they weren't intense enough... didn't really do much to extract the information desired from our fellow countrymen who fell into their hands as captives. Or they were modified... increased by our enemy in frequency, duration and intensity to apply the fear of God, the pressure on their subjects, our countrymen to chat it up and give up information they might or might not really have.
Yeah... those vile, vicious enhanced interrogation techniques that were cast aside by our earlier enemies as ineffective, not intense enough for them to employ as a part of their own information gathering game plan.
It seems our enemies have softened considerably. They're weak... Though the al qaeda, taliban... radical mooslums who live to see us destroyed tend to lean towards drilling holes in knees, faces, arms, legs with drills, cutting off fingers, hands, heads... burning their prisoners and much worse to extract information... it seems they can't really stomach our country's "enhanced interrogation techniques" (that are applied to our very own warriors in training) when those very same techniques are applied to them. It seems our soldiers, sailors, marines, airmen and contractors who are subjected to this training are far, far more resilient, able and immune to this "torture" than their al qaeda, taliban or radical muslim "counterparts" are.
Either way the hapless, self serving, inept president... obama and his corrupt den of politicos have stooped to a new low and have declassified documents that have effectively weakened our defense, threatened our existence... once again.
I just can't help it. I'm inclined to think it's all by design. I'm thinking he's trying to do as much damage as he can to our fine nation in the four years he's got. I'm thinking he's all about failure and shame. I don't know why but I'm thinking he's intent on ruining our life as we know it.
In a nutshell... here's a comment from obama's snake in the grass attorney general sham Eric Holder regarding some friggin' Spanish Judge's decision to open an investigation of the torture and atrocities allegedly practiced at Gitmo. Spain's feeble attempt to play their socialist card and police the world accordingly. A Spaniard's attempt to try those in America responsible in an open "world" court in Spain... a laughable concept at best.
This is from a recent AP article:
"U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder, speaking with reporters in Berlin before the investigation was announced, did not rule out cooperating with such an investigation.
"Obviously, we would look at any request that would come from a court in any country and see how and whether we should comply with it," Holder said.
"This is an administration that is determined to conduct itself by the rule of law and to the extent that we receive lawful requests from an appropriately-created court, we would obviously respond to it," he said.
Asked if that meant the U.S. would cooperate with a foreign court prosecuting Bush administration officials, Holder said he was talking about evidentiary requests, and would review any such request to see if the United States would comply."
You really have to respect Holder's position of "an administration that is determined to conduct itself by the rule of law..."
Hey Eric, have you paid your taxes for 2008 yet? How about '07? '06?
I wasn't sure... I just thought I'd help you out and remind you...
Just in case.
I mean, you gotta carry that "rule of law" torch high Bub... you know, set an example, live as you preach type stuff.
Ah what the heck, 1,360 days left of this senseless, dhimmifying age of appeasement and change.
We can only hope that we, as a nation can survive this idiocy.
CHANGE! An obama promise. We're getting it! Royally!
Those select, hand chosen, redacted, classified documents obama and his political cronies released to the world last week... You know the ones that allege "torture", immoral conduct, illegal shenanigans perpetrated by president Bush and his administration on those helpless, God fearing, misunderstood clumps of humanity we incarcerated at Gitmo and elsewhere.
Yeah, those documents. Not ALL of them, just some of them... choice documents... redacted documents... documents that serve obama's purpose, documents that individually tell a tiny fraction of the whole story of how this country, we the citizens were kept safe for seven years by the previous administration.
Yup. Those documents. The ones that define torture, define "enhanced" or "harsh" interrogation techniques and afford our protectors to practice these enhanced or harsh interrogation techniques on some folks who were (and most likely still are) hell bent on slaughtering the whole lot of us. They'd slaughter us wholesale if they could... no doubt. Just ask them.
Yep. Those documents that were declassified, released to the "press" and exported to our enemies throughout the world. The ones that go into detail, define the parameters of the business of "enhanced interrogations". The documents that ensure those practitioners of these techniques do not cross the line and stray into the "torture" side of things.
Those very documents that help prepare our protectors for a more humane extraction of information from their subjects than say, well... their Al Qaeda or Taliban or... hmmm... radical muslum counterparts. The documents that define waterboarding, sleep deprivation, humiliation, face "slapping" as the type of "torture" applied to me and other soldiers decades ago when we were in this fine country's military and being trained on resisting minimal interrogation techniques commonly practiced by "civilized" nations.
Those documents that define "enhanced interrogation techniques" not necessarily practiced by our "enemy" at the time... the North Vietnamese (and their allies... uh hum... Soviets, Chinese, etc.) because they weren't intense enough... didn't really do much to extract the information desired from our fellow countrymen who fell into their hands as captives. Or they were modified... increased by our enemy in frequency, duration and intensity to apply the fear of God, the pressure on their subjects, our countrymen to chat it up and give up information they might or might not really have.
Yeah... those vile, vicious enhanced interrogation techniques that were cast aside by our earlier enemies as ineffective, not intense enough for them to employ as a part of their own information gathering game plan.
It seems our enemies have softened considerably. They're weak... Though the al qaeda, taliban... radical mooslums who live to see us destroyed tend to lean towards drilling holes in knees, faces, arms, legs with drills, cutting off fingers, hands, heads... burning their prisoners and much worse to extract information... it seems they can't really stomach our country's "enhanced interrogation techniques" (that are applied to our very own warriors in training) when those very same techniques are applied to them. It seems our soldiers, sailors, marines, airmen and contractors who are subjected to this training are far, far more resilient, able and immune to this "torture" than their al qaeda, taliban or radical muslim "counterparts" are.
Either way the hapless, self serving, inept president... obama and his corrupt den of politicos have stooped to a new low and have declassified documents that have effectively weakened our defense, threatened our existence... once again.
I just can't help it. I'm inclined to think it's all by design. I'm thinking he's trying to do as much damage as he can to our fine nation in the four years he's got. I'm thinking he's all about failure and shame. I don't know why but I'm thinking he's intent on ruining our life as we know it.
In a nutshell... here's a comment from obama's snake in the grass attorney general sham Eric Holder regarding some friggin' Spanish Judge's decision to open an investigation of the torture and atrocities allegedly practiced at Gitmo. Spain's feeble attempt to play their socialist card and police the world accordingly. A Spaniard's attempt to try those in America responsible in an open "world" court in Spain... a laughable concept at best.
This is from a recent AP article:
"U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder, speaking with reporters in Berlin before the investigation was announced, did not rule out cooperating with such an investigation.
"Obviously, we would look at any request that would come from a court in any country and see how and whether we should comply with it," Holder said.
"This is an administration that is determined to conduct itself by the rule of law and to the extent that we receive lawful requests from an appropriately-created court, we would obviously respond to it," he said.
Asked if that meant the U.S. would cooperate with a foreign court prosecuting Bush administration officials, Holder said he was talking about evidentiary requests, and would review any such request to see if the United States would comply."
You really have to respect Holder's position of "an administration that is determined to conduct itself by the rule of law..."
Hey Eric, have you paid your taxes for 2008 yet? How about '07? '06?
I wasn't sure... I just thought I'd help you out and remind you...
Just in case.
I mean, you gotta carry that "rule of law" torch high Bub... you know, set an example, live as you preach type stuff.
Ah what the heck, 1,360 days left of this senseless, dhimmifying age of appeasement and change.
We can only hope that we, as a nation can survive this idiocy.
CHANGE! An obama promise. We're getting it! Royally!
Sunday, January 04, 2009
Nations condemn Israel's Gaza invasion!
"by Samer al-Atrush Samer Al-atrush – Sun Jan 4, 7:10 am ET
CAIRO (AFP) –
(Picture: This religious freak's creed to his fellow muslims.)
Israel's ground offensive in the Gaza Strip was roundly condemned across the Middle East on Sunday, with Egypt also accusing the UN Security Council of failing to act quickly to resolve the crisis.
Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Abul Gheit said Israel's incursion into the impoverished territory on Saturday night came in "brazen defiance" of international calls to end the fighting.
"The Security Council's silence and its failure to take a decision to stop Israel's aggression since it began was interpreted by Israel as a green light," he said in a statement as Israeli forces rumbled into Gaza."
(Picture: hamas freak with missile)
Okay, you hit a nerve here...
Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Syria, Turkey… hell, all of the middle east fanatics are condemning Israel… CONDEMNING ISRAEL for kicking ass on the friggin’ Hamas clan! You know, the same clan that launches missiles into Israel on a daily if not hourly basis. The same clan that uses “peace” as a weapon and hides behind women and children. The same clan that's killed Israelis over and over and over again without provocation.
It's a given that the middle east zealots CONDEMN ISRAEL. The question is where were these same biased sons of pigs when Hamas missiles rained down on Israel over the years. Where were these piglets when the Hamas tribe terrorized innocent citizens of Israel?
(Picture: hamas missiles they claim they don't have)
You, you middle east "leaders"... where was your CONDEMNATION OF HAMAS when all of that was going on you friggin’ one sided islamic, ass kissing, piglet pricks?
Your “condemnation” carries no weight, means nada when it’s not equally enforced.
Piss up a rope you middle east fanatics. You're all nothing but a friggin' bunch of pompous cowards. Your supposed condemnation is a poorly veiled, pathetic attempt to protect a nest of terrorists bent on destroying Israel. Let the terrorist be destroyed!
(Picture: jihad terrorists with mortar)
You CONDEMN a nation for defending itself? You CONDEMN a nation for wanting to stop the killing of its innocent citizens? You CONDEMN a nation for wanting to end the fight once and for all? You CONDEMN a nation that simply wants to live in peace?
You’re all sick. You’re so full of yourselves over there in that cesspool of sand called the middle east. I can only hope the proud and valiant Israelis finish their fight this time rather than succumb to your shameless global politics.
“Saudi's Al-Riyadh attacked US President George W. Bush "who started his first presidential mandate with wars of occupation in Iraq and Afghanistan and ends his (White House) days welcoming the spilling of Palestinian blood."
(Picture: Remnants of terrorist missile in Israeli field.)
Damned straight Riyadh baby! Take it up with your pedophile prophet mohamud if it bothers you so. What would you, a Saudi know about protecting your citizens? You've always relied on others to do that for you. George Bush is only doing what the Jimmy Carters of this world wouldn’t and couldn’t do. Bush is standing up to all of you fanatics and is finally bringing the fight to you... you know, we call that taking the fight to the enemy. Something you and your saudi royalty know nothing about.
Israel is protecting it's very right to exist... plain and simple!
And furthermore SAUDI idiots, where was your condemnation when we were hit on 9-11? If I recall you tried to dhimmify us by telling us how wrong WE were and what WE did to provoke the attacks. Then you tried to buy our good will with a check, a handout of corrupt oil money… money that Rudy Giuliani promptly and righteously turned down.
Yeah, Middle Eastern “CONDEMNATION” means nothing to us. The clans of the middle east have always condemned what Israel and the United States have done. Why change now you freaks.
We CONDEMN YOU, our middle eastern friends!
Israel, go kick some terrorist ass! Don’t stop with Hamas!
CAIRO (AFP) –
(Picture: This religious freak's creed to his fellow muslims.)
Israel's ground offensive in the Gaza Strip was roundly condemned across the Middle East on Sunday, with Egypt also accusing the UN Security Council of failing to act quickly to resolve the crisis.
Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Abul Gheit said Israel's incursion into the impoverished territory on Saturday night came in "brazen defiance" of international calls to end the fighting.
"The Security Council's silence and its failure to take a decision to stop Israel's aggression since it began was interpreted by Israel as a green light," he said in a statement as Israeli forces rumbled into Gaza."
(Picture: hamas freak with missile)Okay, you hit a nerve here...
Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Syria, Turkey… hell, all of the middle east fanatics are condemning Israel… CONDEMNING ISRAEL for kicking ass on the friggin’ Hamas clan! You know, the same clan that launches missiles into Israel on a daily if not hourly basis. The same clan that uses “peace” as a weapon and hides behind women and children. The same clan that's killed Israelis over and over and over again without provocation.
It's a given that the middle east zealots CONDEMN ISRAEL. The question is where were these same biased sons of pigs when Hamas missiles rained down on Israel over the years. Where were these piglets when the Hamas tribe terrorized innocent citizens of Israel?
(Picture: hamas missiles they claim they don't have)
You, you middle east "leaders"... where was your CONDEMNATION OF HAMAS when all of that was going on you friggin’ one sided islamic, ass kissing, piglet pricks?
Your “condemnation” carries no weight, means nada when it’s not equally enforced.
Piss up a rope you middle east fanatics. You're all nothing but a friggin' bunch of pompous cowards. Your supposed condemnation is a poorly veiled, pathetic attempt to protect a nest of terrorists bent on destroying Israel. Let the terrorist be destroyed!
(Picture: jihad terrorists with mortar)You CONDEMN a nation for defending itself? You CONDEMN a nation for wanting to stop the killing of its innocent citizens? You CONDEMN a nation for wanting to end the fight once and for all? You CONDEMN a nation that simply wants to live in peace?
You’re all sick. You’re so full of yourselves over there in that cesspool of sand called the middle east. I can only hope the proud and valiant Israelis finish their fight this time rather than succumb to your shameless global politics.
“Saudi's Al-Riyadh attacked US President George W. Bush "who started his first presidential mandate with wars of occupation in Iraq and Afghanistan and ends his (White House) days welcoming the spilling of Palestinian blood."
(Picture: Remnants of terrorist missile in Israeli field.)
Damned straight Riyadh baby! Take it up with your pedophile prophet mohamud if it bothers you so. What would you, a Saudi know about protecting your citizens? You've always relied on others to do that for you. George Bush is only doing what the Jimmy Carters of this world wouldn’t and couldn’t do. Bush is standing up to all of you fanatics and is finally bringing the fight to you... you know, we call that taking the fight to the enemy. Something you and your saudi royalty know nothing about.
Israel is protecting it's very right to exist... plain and simple!
And furthermore SAUDI idiots, where was your condemnation when we were hit on 9-11? If I recall you tried to dhimmify us by telling us how wrong WE were and what WE did to provoke the attacks. Then you tried to buy our good will with a check, a handout of corrupt oil money… money that Rudy Giuliani promptly and righteously turned down.
Yeah, Middle Eastern “CONDEMNATION” means nothing to us. The clans of the middle east have always condemned what Israel and the United States have done. Why change now you freaks.
We CONDEMN YOU, our middle eastern friends!
Israel, go kick some terrorist ass! Don’t stop with Hamas!
Sunday, October 26, 2008
Barack Hussein Obama! Was it Kenya or Hawaii???
We, the citizens of this fine country demand to know where you were born!
Were you born in Kenya?
Barack Hussein, were you born in Kenya to muslim parents as you've stated in the past? Were you born in Kenya and adopted in Indonesia as you've said in the past? Were you born in Hawaii as your bogus 1970 Hawaii certificate of live birth suggests?
Where were you born and what are your true allegiances?
Why are you refusing to produce a REAL certificate of live birth. Your arrogance is overwhelming. You place yourself well above us regular Joe and Joanne Blue Collar citizens. You hide behind your DNC and Chicago cronies. You talk in circles and avoid the hardball questions. Your gang of thugs have tried to humiliate and destroy anyone who asks legitimate questions about you, your past and your candidacy.
Isn't it about time that you answer these questions? Don't you think you should serve the public you so desperately want to serve by letting us know more about you?
While you're producing that vault copy of your live birth certification why don't you produce the other information all of the other candidates had to produce. You know your health records, your various college transcript, etc. We don't want to see a one page letter from your doctor. We want you to be truly vetted! ...not powdered over by your gloss team.
As you've probably figured by now I'm not voting for you. Nope. I'm not one to throw away a very important vote on a person who won't reveal his true identity let alone on a person who ignores a righteous hue and call to explain his relationships with terrorists, radical preachers and priests and con men.
What do you have to hide Barack Hussein Obama?
As mentioned in an article entitled "Obama Refuses to Answer Birth Certificate Lawsuit" authored on Friday, October 24, 2008 4:16 PM By: Kenneth R. Timmerman... "Lawyers for Obama and the DNC did not return calls for comment on the current status of the case, or explain why the Obama campaign did not simply put to rest the whole controversy by releasing the birth certificate that Obama apparently cherished as a teenager."
I mean, afterall in order to be considered as a legitimate candidate for the president of this great United States you have to be a natural born citizen of this country. It's a simple rule... a simple and safe requirement. If you aren't a natural born citizen of this fine country then you cannot run for the presidency.
Pretty simple...
So, if you are who you claim to be and are truly legitimate you shouldn't have a problem complying with such a simple request. And while you're at it fill in the holes you have regarding the other issues too.
The American public has every right to know!
Were you born in Kenya?
Barack Hussein, were you born in Kenya to muslim parents as you've stated in the past? Were you born in Kenya and adopted in Indonesia as you've said in the past? Were you born in Hawaii as your bogus 1970 Hawaii certificate of live birth suggests?
Where were you born and what are your true allegiances?
Why are you refusing to produce a REAL certificate of live birth. Your arrogance is overwhelming. You place yourself well above us regular Joe and Joanne Blue Collar citizens. You hide behind your DNC and Chicago cronies. You talk in circles and avoid the hardball questions. Your gang of thugs have tried to humiliate and destroy anyone who asks legitimate questions about you, your past and your candidacy.
Isn't it about time that you answer these questions? Don't you think you should serve the public you so desperately want to serve by letting us know more about you?
While you're producing that vault copy of your live birth certification why don't you produce the other information all of the other candidates had to produce. You know your health records, your various college transcript, etc. We don't want to see a one page letter from your doctor. We want you to be truly vetted! ...not powdered over by your gloss team.
As you've probably figured by now I'm not voting for you. Nope. I'm not one to throw away a very important vote on a person who won't reveal his true identity let alone on a person who ignores a righteous hue and call to explain his relationships with terrorists, radical preachers and priests and con men.
What do you have to hide Barack Hussein Obama?
As mentioned in an article entitled "Obama Refuses to Answer Birth Certificate Lawsuit" authored on Friday, October 24, 2008 4:16 PM By: Kenneth R. Timmerman... "Lawyers for Obama and the DNC did not return calls for comment on the current status of the case, or explain why the Obama campaign did not simply put to rest the whole controversy by releasing the birth certificate that Obama apparently cherished as a teenager."
I mean, afterall in order to be considered as a legitimate candidate for the president of this great United States you have to be a natural born citizen of this country. It's a simple rule... a simple and safe requirement. If you aren't a natural born citizen of this fine country then you cannot run for the presidency.
Pretty simple...
So, if you are who you claim to be and are truly legitimate you shouldn't have a problem complying with such a simple request. And while you're at it fill in the holes you have regarding the other issues too.
The American public has every right to know!
Tuesday, May 22, 2007
"Fatah al-islam will take its fight---
---beyond Nahr al-Bared and Tripoli!"
If the Lebanese military will ever let them that is.
I mean after all, the islamic terrorists fatah al-islam provoked this fight. They tried to bloody the nose of the Lebanese government by setting off a couple of bombs and getting into some pretty wild shootouts here and there over the past couple of days. Now they're huddled in a squalid refugee camp hiding out amongst the "refugees", using the innocents as human shields--- the way of the islamic terrorist.
But the Lebanese commanders wouldn't fall for it. As the islamo rats ran back into their rat hole the Lebanese commanders sent their military after them. They showered the islamic pigs with artillery, an occasional bullet here and there whenever one of the islamo freaks mustered enough courage to shoot at them and a tank shell or two.
Having had enough of it for the time being the fatso al-islam "terrorists" are now calling for their second cease fire in as many days---
---or is it their third?
Who knows, I lost count.
Either way, the military tactics of this pathetic group of islumo terrorists are pretty damned sorry and predictable. Like the rodents they are they sneak out of the refugee camp during the cease fires, plant some bombs here and there to slaughter some innocents, shoot at a couple of folks and run back to the camp. Once there, they request another cease fire. That's it! I imagine this tactic can be found on page 4 of the fatso al-islum manual of terror and warfare (draft).
I even think there was at least one "truce" declared in this little "war". I read about it somewhere but when I went back to reference the article an hour or so later I couldn't find it. Besides, both sides were fighting again so I figured the news of "peace" was old news.
One has to admit though, this butt kicking that the Lebanese army is applying to this fatso al-islam gang is pretty impressive.
You have to hand it to the Lebanese troops. Their tactics are simple and effective. They respond to stimuli. It's a pretty natural and basic rule. Don't shoot at us and we won't shoot at you!.
That's the truth. That's their message to this fatso al-islum band of thugs. Here's the quote right out of Earth Times. "The Lebanese army on its part said that they will not shoot if they are not shot at."
Now any dolt should be able to figure that particular rule out.
Go figure.
If the Lebanese military will ever let them that is.
I mean after all, the islamic terrorists fatah al-islam provoked this fight. They tried to bloody the nose of the Lebanese government by setting off a couple of bombs and getting into some pretty wild shootouts here and there over the past couple of days. Now they're huddled in a squalid refugee camp hiding out amongst the "refugees", using the innocents as human shields--- the way of the islamic terrorist.
But the Lebanese commanders wouldn't fall for it. As the islamo rats ran back into their rat hole the Lebanese commanders sent their military after them. They showered the islamic pigs with artillery, an occasional bullet here and there whenever one of the islamo freaks mustered enough courage to shoot at them and a tank shell or two.
Having had enough of it for the time being the fatso al-islam "terrorists" are now calling for their second cease fire in as many days---
---or is it their third?
Who knows, I lost count.
Either way, the military tactics of this pathetic group of islumo terrorists are pretty damned sorry and predictable. Like the rodents they are they sneak out of the refugee camp during the cease fires, plant some bombs here and there to slaughter some innocents, shoot at a couple of folks and run back to the camp. Once there, they request another cease fire. That's it! I imagine this tactic can be found on page 4 of the fatso al-islum manual of terror and warfare (draft).
I even think there was at least one "truce" declared in this little "war". I read about it somewhere but when I went back to reference the article an hour or so later I couldn't find it. Besides, both sides were fighting again so I figured the news of "peace" was old news.
One has to admit though, this butt kicking that the Lebanese army is applying to this fatso al-islam gang is pretty impressive.
You have to hand it to the Lebanese troops. Their tactics are simple and effective. They respond to stimuli. It's a pretty natural and basic rule. Don't shoot at us and we won't shoot at you!.
That's the truth. That's their message to this fatso al-islum band of thugs. Here's the quote right out of Earth Times. "The Lebanese army on its part said that they will not shoot if they are not shot at."
Now any dolt should be able to figure that particular rule out.
Go figure.
Saturday, May 19, 2007
Ahmadinejad rocks on---
I'm not sure whose creation this is but it's good, entertaining and funny!
Many thanks to our friends over at Irate Nation for providing the initial link to the short video.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
