They're on their way here via Mexico and our open border with them. And Mexico's doing nothing to stop them.
But then again, why would they? They're all about flooding our country with illegals and taking possession of what they seem to believe was theirs in the first place. Even though history shows they "acquired" their claim via the ruthless assault, enslavement and slaughter of the indigenous peoples of North America.
Don't expect the liberals, the Democrats to support our efforts to ebb the tide of illegal immigrants marching through Mexico and subsequently across our border. These would be new voters for them and they realize they're most definitely in need of new, needy, liberal voters.
I just wonder what gave this over one thousand strong horde of "refugees" the idea to march from Honduras, their "home country", through Mexico and into the United States. Obviously they didn't just collectively come up with that idea. I'm pretty sure it came from some outside, out of Honduras influence. Perhaps the leftists, those liberal folks both domestic and global who would love to see our country become a socialist puppet, at best.
The fight to save our country continues and will continue throughout our existence, or so it seems.
IMHO
04/04/2018 LATEST UPDATE!
The Mexican government has apparently halted the northern migration of the Hondurans somewhere in Mexico. They've suggested the Hondurans either return to Honduras or apply for citizenship in Mexico instead of continuing their journey to the United States. According to the source I read if the Hondurans don't want to apply for citizenship or are otherwise unable to be granted Mexican citizenship then they will be given assistance to return to Honduras.
So, it's a "wait and see" what happens here.
#
Showing posts with label illegal immigration. Show all posts
Showing posts with label illegal immigration. Show all posts
Tuesday, April 03, 2018
Friday, February 09, 2018
Yes Dorothy, There Is A Deep State!
And it's being unraveled and exposed more with each passing day! Don't ever think our politicos are "above" criminal behavior. They're smack in the middle of it and have been choreographing our nations demise since the left took over in 2008. They made their "balls to the wall" push when that fellow who was brought out of the shadows, barrack hussein obama was put on the democrat ticket for POTUS way back in the day of Bush Jr.'s presidency.
obama was harvested as a young child by the left, coddled throughout his childhood and spoon fed liberalism until he was unleashed on us in 2008 as our bought and paid for POTUS... the global elites, shining light.
They were giddy with their "accomplishments" of mentoring, grooming and finally buying obama and his ilk before buying the Presidency. The only problem was, Obam didn't get it done. Once again the deep state failed in spite of Soros, Rockefeller, Bush, etc. money tossed into the pot. They were so sure of themselves and their 2016 POTUS victory that they stooped to the lowly Clintons to return a favor, several favors and guaranteed another Clinton presidency.
But it didn't work. Americans, real Americans caught on and called their bluff, saving our nation from certain ruin.
And now the dreamers, those who were encouraged to come here and "wait it out" until the final blow to our republic, our existence as a United States of America was delivered to us, well those dreamers have lost their interest and are going to "head back home" if our POTUS Donald J. Trump and our country decides to eliminate any DACA deals in our efforts to truly secure our borders.
I say, let it happen! Make America Great Again!!!
Eliminate DACA! Become a citizen or go back to your home country.
IMHO
#
obama was harvested as a young child by the left, coddled throughout his childhood and spoon fed liberalism until he was unleashed on us in 2008 as our bought and paid for POTUS... the global elites, shining light.
They were giddy with their "accomplishments" of mentoring, grooming and finally buying obama and his ilk before buying the Presidency. The only problem was, Obam didn't get it done. Once again the deep state failed in spite of Soros, Rockefeller, Bush, etc. money tossed into the pot. They were so sure of themselves and their 2016 POTUS victory that they stooped to the lowly Clintons to return a favor, several favors and guaranteed another Clinton presidency.
But it didn't work. Americans, real Americans caught on and called their bluff, saving our nation from certain ruin.
And now the dreamers, those who were encouraged to come here and "wait it out" until the final blow to our republic, our existence as a United States of America was delivered to us, well those dreamers have lost their interest and are going to "head back home" if our POTUS Donald J. Trump and our country decides to eliminate any DACA deals in our efforts to truly secure our borders.
I say, let it happen! Make America Great Again!!!
Eliminate DACA! Become a citizen or go back to your home country.
IMHO
#
Friday, January 26, 2018
Sessions! Just Shut Up And Do It!
Once again we hear Sessions and the Trump administration rattle that
darned "illegal immigrant" sword and thump their chests. Remember those
laws, that Bill of Rights, that Constitution and those Amendment things that some pretty dad-gummed "wiser than us" fellows
wrote back in the 1700's? Those laws that several others have tweaked since, remember them? I always thought they were and still are pretty
simple, common sense laws. They're matter of fact, they're logical, they're
succinct and they were written to protect us, the citizens of this MIGHTY FINE
United States of America, our republic. So enforce the darned
things! Quit posturing! Grow a pair, dammit!
Here's a note contributed to the discussion of the post by Lonney L. Sennet following the referenced article above relating to illegal immigration:
Regarding Mr. Sennet's post, I think it's spot on! We need to enforce the laws that are already in the books, we need to hold accountable those who violate our laws for the benefit of their political interests/beliefs. If any of us were to harbor, aid, abet any illegal alien to the level these politicos are aiding and abetting them in their "sanctuary cities/states" we'd be imprisoned. It's a simple fact!
A.G. Jeff Sessions, shut up and make it happen. Do something about the illegal harboring, the aiding and abetting of.. well... illegals! Shut up and enforce the darned law! Even if it means ruffling a few feathers in the politico arena! I could care less about bruised egos and "politically correct" rhetoric! Do what must be done! Do your job Jeff Sessions!
Enforce those laws!
Darn it! I hate politics!
IMHO
#
Here's a note contributed to the discussion of the post by Lonney L. Sennet following the referenced article above relating to illegal immigration:
"If we aided and abetted people trying to illegally enter our country, we would be arrested without hesitation and charged with the following:
1907. Title 8, U.S.C. 1324(a) Offenses Title 8, U.S.C. § 1324(a) defines several distinct offenses related to aliens. Subsection 1324(a)(1)(i)-(v) prohibits alien smuggling, domestic transportation of unauthorized aliens, concealing or harboring unauthorized aliens, encouraging or inducing unauthorized aliens to enter the United States, and engaging in a conspiracy or aiding and abetting any of the preceding acts. Subsection 1324(a)(2) prohibits bringing or attempting to bring unauthorized aliens to the United States in any manner whatsoever, even at a designated port of entry. Subsection 1324(a)(3).
Encouraging/Inducing -- Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv) makes it an offense for any person who -- encourages or induces an alien to come to, enter, or reside in the United States, knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that such coming to, entry, or residence is or will be in violation of law.
Conspiracy/Aiding or Abetting -- Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(v) expressly makes it an offense to engage in a conspiracy to commit or aid or abet the commission of the foregoing offenses.
Bringing Aliens to the United States -- Subsection 1324(a)(2) makes it an offense for any person who -- knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an alien has not received prior authorization to come to, enter, or reside in the United States, to bring to or attempts to bring to the United States in any manner whatsoever, such alien, regardless of any official action which may later be taken with respect to such alien."
Regarding Mr. Sennet's post, I think it's spot on! We need to enforce the laws that are already in the books, we need to hold accountable those who violate our laws for the benefit of their political interests/beliefs. If any of us were to harbor, aid, abet any illegal alien to the level these politicos are aiding and abetting them in their "sanctuary cities/states" we'd be imprisoned. It's a simple fact!
A.G. Jeff Sessions, shut up and make it happen. Do something about the illegal harboring, the aiding and abetting of.. well... illegals! Shut up and enforce the darned law! Even if it means ruffling a few feathers in the politico arena! I could care less about bruised egos and "politically correct" rhetoric! Do what must be done! Do your job Jeff Sessions!
Enforce those laws!
Darn it! I hate politics!
IMHO
#
Thursday, January 18, 2018
DACA! Plain and Simple!
Remember that DACA thing? This is the latest version that includes the 01/12/2018 update. At least it's a start and it might be something to look forward to provided our politicos quit playing politics and get serious about serving us, the citizens that elected them into office.
Here's some highlights from the linked article...
Here's some highlights from the linked article...
The bill:
- Eliminates the Visa Lottery green card program
- Eliminates Chain Migration and creates a renewable temporary visa for parents of citizens to unite families at no cost to taxpayers
- Reduces legal immigration levels by about 260,000 a year – a decrease of about 25%
- Reforms the agricultural guest worker program
- Sends additional ICE agents to more high-risk embassies overseas to vet visitors and
- immigrants
- Provides additional technology, roads and other tactical infrastructure to secure the border
- Adds 5,000 Border Patrol Agents and 5,000 CBP Officers
- Requires full implementation of the biometric entry/exit system at all air, land, and sea ports of entry
- Makes E-Verify Mandatory for all employers
- Authorizes the Department of Justice to withhold law enforcement grants from sanctuary cities
- Allows DHS to detain dangerous illegal immigrants who cannot be removed
- Reduces asylum fraud by tightening the “credible fear” standard to root out frivolous claims and increases penalties for fraud/terminates asylum for individuals who voluntarily return home
- Grants amnesty to DACA recipients by issuing a 3-year renewable visa with work permit
And here's today's update relating to the "progress" of this piece of legislation after some politicos reviewed the "gang of six" proposal. This "update" fails to address our POTUS Trump's priorities relating to immigration..
Given that, it appears there's still a lot of politicking to do. Given that Flake's involved I'm imagining it's going to take a long time. Flake doesn't seem to accept the fact that most of us Americans want our borders secured and our immigration properly regulated. I'm hoping he rethinks his departure plans and leaves earlier than expected. But I doubt that will ever happen.
"The proposal, presented by Sens. Durbin (D-Ill.), Flake (R-Ariz.), and Graham (R-S.C.) would not strengthen border security or interior enforcement, fails to end Chain Migration and the Visa Lottery, and would grant amnesty, not only to previous DACA recipients, but to all Dreamers and their parents as well."
And yet another failed, self serving stab at open door immigration supported by Flake, Graham and Durbin.
IMHO
##
IMHO
##
Friday, August 25, 2017
Chicago? VALUES???!!!
You're kidding me!
"In 2016, more Chicagoans were murdered than in New York City and Los Angeles combined". A gun free Chitcago I might add.
Chitcago, the north central "sanctuary city"... a nest of crime, corruption, murder, mayhem and a haven for illegals! And that POS "mayor" Rahm Emanuel calls this "VALUES"?!
Things must have changed since my father lived there as a child. It must have changed one helluva lot. And from what I've read, heard and seen it hasn't changed for the better.
So now that POS Chitcago mayor Raum Emanuel is suing us, our country for enforcing our nation's laws in the city he seems to think he "owns". I mean, the last I read, saw, the last I heard Chitcago is still a part of one of the fifty states (Illinois) comprising this mighty fine United States of America. What Emanuel does in Chitcago affects all of us and he knows it.
It's the ballerina's way of "putting it to us" so to speak. He's part of that fair haired group of politicos who's had a "silver spoon" fed to him and can't seem to get away from loving the lifestyle. His marching orders are clear, or so it seems.
The global elite, his fellow left wing hacks are still hell bent on destroying our country. They're amping up their responses to the global elite's hue and call for more "immigration", "integration" into our country... illegal or not, from the liberal elite corners of the world.
It's a wholesale global attempt to dilute our conservative culture, our conservativism in this mighty fine United States of America. And Chitcago, Phoenix, all of southern California, Portland, Seattle, Houston... many, many other so-called "sanctuary cities"... their "leadership" is catering to the greed of the global elite, of liberalism with total disregard for us, our security, our safety, our sovereignity... us, the fine citizens of this mighty fine United States of America.
And it's all about the party, the agenda... but first it's about the liberal vote. They need more votes. Liberals, they've sold their souls to the global elite.
"numbers by immigration, victory in numbers over time"... a liberal claim I've noted several times.
These are VALUES???!!!
To some I guess. But not for the majority of us.
IMHO
"In 2016, more Chicagoans were murdered than in New York City and Los Angeles combined". A gun free Chitcago I might add.
Chitcago, the north central "sanctuary city"... a nest of crime, corruption, murder, mayhem and a haven for illegals! And that POS "mayor" Rahm Emanuel calls this "VALUES"?!
Things must have changed since my father lived there as a child. It must have changed one helluva lot. And from what I've read, heard and seen it hasn't changed for the better.
So now that POS Chitcago mayor Raum Emanuel is suing us, our country for enforcing our nation's laws in the city he seems to think he "owns". I mean, the last I read, saw, the last I heard Chitcago is still a part of one of the fifty states (Illinois) comprising this mighty fine United States of America. What Emanuel does in Chitcago affects all of us and he knows it.
It's the ballerina's way of "putting it to us" so to speak. He's part of that fair haired group of politicos who's had a "silver spoon" fed to him and can't seem to get away from loving the lifestyle. His marching orders are clear, or so it seems.
The global elite, his fellow left wing hacks are still hell bent on destroying our country. They're amping up their responses to the global elite's hue and call for more "immigration", "integration" into our country... illegal or not, from the liberal elite corners of the world.
It's a wholesale global attempt to dilute our conservative culture, our conservativism in this mighty fine United States of America. And Chitcago, Phoenix, all of southern California, Portland, Seattle, Houston... many, many other so-called "sanctuary cities"... their "leadership" is catering to the greed of the global elite, of liberalism with total disregard for us, our security, our safety, our sovereignity... us, the fine citizens of this mighty fine United States of America.
And it's all about the party, the agenda... but first it's about the liberal vote. They need more votes. Liberals, they've sold their souls to the global elite.
"numbers by immigration, victory in numbers over time"... a liberal claim I've noted several times.
These are VALUES???!!!
To some I guess. But not for the majority of us.
IMHO
Friday, August 04, 2017
Looking at IMMIGRATIONS. Specifically, how the RAISE Act is working...
Remember the RAISE act introduced by Republican Arkansas Senator Tom Cotton and discussed previously on other sources earlier this year? Well it seems to be doing the job it was designed to do.
In brief, it's intent is to
1- End the "Visa Lottery"
2- Limit annual refugee admissions to 50,000
3- End chain migration
4- Reduce worldwide level of family-sponsored immigrants from 480,000 to 88,000 by only prioritizing the nuclear family.
5- Add a nonimmigrant visa for parents of adult U.S. citizens (W-Visa) that could be renewable in 5 years with no work authorization or ability to receive public benefits assigned to the visa.
In essence, it's what we need to regain control of our country and it's a step in the right direction at least.
So how's it working so far?
Well, there's some bumps in the road.
Here are the problems...
You see, the mainstream media makes their failed and flawed arguments via distortions, all smoke and mirrors. We need to get down into the weeds with those groups, those sources like Numbers USA and those folks like Jeremy Beck who actually do research their subject matter and do report the truth.
IMHO
In brief, it's intent is to
1- End the "Visa Lottery"
2- Limit annual refugee admissions to 50,000
3- End chain migration
4- Reduce worldwide level of family-sponsored immigrants from 480,000 to 88,000 by only prioritizing the nuclear family.
5- Add a nonimmigrant visa for parents of adult U.S. citizens (W-Visa) that could be renewable in 5 years with no work authorization or ability to receive public benefits assigned to the visa.
In essence, it's what we need to regain control of our country and it's a step in the right direction at least.
So how's it working so far?
Well, there's some bumps in the road.
Here are the problems...
You see, the mainstream media makes their failed and flawed arguments via distortions, all smoke and mirrors. We need to get down into the weeds with those groups, those sources like Numbers USA and those folks like Jeremy Beck who actually do research their subject matter and do report the truth.
IMHO
Thursday, August 03, 2017
America's Sheriff Joe Arpaio Was Found "Guilty"
He's been found guilty and will be sentenced by an ultra liberal judge in October for a misdemeanor offense. Sheriff Joe Arpaio has been and still is a true American Patriot! He deserves more than this!
The claim is Sheriff Arpaio was illegally "profiling" maggots to obtain information that afforded Sheriff Joe Arpaio and his deputies to properly enforce the laws of the land for Arizona's and our, the rest of the nation's protection.
The claim is Sheriff Arpaio was illegally "profiling" maggots to obtain information that afforded Sheriff Joe Arpaio and his deputies to properly enforce the laws of the land for Arizona's and our, the rest of the nation's protection.
Sheriff
Joe Arpaio was doing his job! He was doing it all too well evidently.
He garnered the angst of the left, the liberals and the illegals. Now
he's being propped up on the stake and the liberal fools are igniting
the fuels at his feet as an example for all to see.
All because he did his job and did it very well!
How'd Sheriff Joe Arpaio do his job so well? It's simple. He incorporated good, known, proven law enforcement techniques into the job knowing full well that there was a very real possibility the liberal mindset would eventually succeed him in the office he held for so long, County Sheriff.
And it did! True to form the liberals won in Arizona and now they're going to throw a true American peace keeper into the fires of liberalism.
...and they dare call Sheriff Joe a "profiler" in disgust.
After having served in several jurisdictions as a law enforcement officer (from patrol to investigations to chief), after honorably ending my military service in 1975 I'm seeing what some say are glaring "flaws" in the "old" law enforcement system that have been brought to my attention over the years by a number of liberal, moderate and even conservative citizens and non-citizens alike.
I don't agree with their assessments. Especially those relating to "profiling". It's a simple word that's so easy to distort and twist to fit the current needs of whatever interest group(s) wants to distort it to.
Us cops, we tend to "profile" almost everything. Or so I'm told. And you know what, it's a factual statement in a lot of ways. EVERYTHING we do is founded on some sort of "profile" one way or another. Recruiting, hiring, training, education, public contact/outreach, patrol, investigations, administration, corrections, interaction with the public, equipment purchases... even the judicial side of the coin. First offenders, repeat offenders, psychological reports, varied criminal penalties for offenses, etc. EVERYTHING! is profiled in one way or another.
If we realize a particular jurisdiction or an "impacted" area within a jurisdiction is experiencing an increase in (general) criminal activity or particular type of criminal activity (trends) it's not unusual for the affected police agency to increase patrols in that particular area. If there's a noted increase in certain, particular types of crimes it's not unusual for a police agency to adjust their focus to those activities, those "elements" known to be associated with those crimes and to share most, if not all of the information with other jurisdictions, depending on the circumstances of course.
Law enforcement uses statistical data and analysis of that (and other) data DAILY to identify, adjust and adapt to the existing and quite often disturbing criminal activity/elements identified and associated with the data.
From what I've experienced that's PROFILING in most liberal minds.
If law enforcement isn't supposed to "profile" then perhaps we should eliminate background checks altogether. Also, let's remove the "race" (or "nationality), "sex/gender" and "physical characteristics" qualifiers on booking sheets, criminal records, wanted posters, Amber Alerts... the applications for new police candidates, corrections officer and all other government employees associated with law enforcement not to mention those arrested for offenses/crimes and those imprisoned after having been tried and convicted for their crimes.
Let's eliminate all of that! In the liberal mindset that's the nexus for "profiling"!
No more mugshots (they depict race, gender, scars, marks, tatoos, oddities and preferences). Make it a rule that fingerprints can only be retained for comparison to the specific crime that the subject was incarcerated for and only compared to his/her fingerprints. Don't allow the fingerprints to be shared with other agencies, other law enforcement entities. The very sharing of that information would constitute "profiling". Sharing a criminal profile of a suspect with another agency IS profiling!
Absolutely eliminate all DNA testing. It's too defining, too absolute, too exact and ensures profiling in the nth degree. DNA testing is designed to specifically identify a "potential" suspect by their very DNA PROFILE!!!
It's PROFILING!!!
It also saves lives, prevents criminal activity and protects the innocent.
In short, eliminate law enforcement altogether. Let everyone tend to our own needs, individually. Take away all guns from reasonable, responsible, legitimate gun owners and let the criminal element run its course.
Heck, take away ALL weapons. Anything that can be used in an assault. Anything that can be used to damage, injure, maim, kill, destroy. Anything that can be used to intimidate... coerce. Take it all away.
Now that's the preferred liberal approach.
I for one won't play that "game". If those things happen I will become the criminal because I will break those laws.
That given, I know I have and I will continue to keep me and mine safe at all costs. How about you?
IMHO
All because he did his job and did it very well!
How'd Sheriff Joe Arpaio do his job so well? It's simple. He incorporated good, known, proven law enforcement techniques into the job knowing full well that there was a very real possibility the liberal mindset would eventually succeed him in the office he held for so long, County Sheriff.
And it did! True to form the liberals won in Arizona and now they're going to throw a true American peace keeper into the fires of liberalism.
...and they dare call Sheriff Joe a "profiler" in disgust.
After having served in several jurisdictions as a law enforcement officer (from patrol to investigations to chief), after honorably ending my military service in 1975 I'm seeing what some say are glaring "flaws" in the "old" law enforcement system that have been brought to my attention over the years by a number of liberal, moderate and even conservative citizens and non-citizens alike.
I don't agree with their assessments. Especially those relating to "profiling". It's a simple word that's so easy to distort and twist to fit the current needs of whatever interest group(s) wants to distort it to.
Us cops, we tend to "profile" almost everything. Or so I'm told. And you know what, it's a factual statement in a lot of ways. EVERYTHING we do is founded on some sort of "profile" one way or another. Recruiting, hiring, training, education, public contact/outreach, patrol, investigations, administration, corrections, interaction with the public, equipment purchases... even the judicial side of the coin. First offenders, repeat offenders, psychological reports, varied criminal penalties for offenses, etc. EVERYTHING! is profiled in one way or another.
If we realize a particular jurisdiction or an "impacted" area within a jurisdiction is experiencing an increase in (general) criminal activity or particular type of criminal activity (trends) it's not unusual for the affected police agency to increase patrols in that particular area. If there's a noted increase in certain, particular types of crimes it's not unusual for a police agency to adjust their focus to those activities, those "elements" known to be associated with those crimes and to share most, if not all of the information with other jurisdictions, depending on the circumstances of course.
Law enforcement uses statistical data and analysis of that (and other) data DAILY to identify, adjust and adapt to the existing and quite often disturbing criminal activity/elements identified and associated with the data.
From what I've experienced that's PROFILING in most liberal minds.
If law enforcement isn't supposed to "profile" then perhaps we should eliminate background checks altogether. Also, let's remove the "race" (or "nationality), "sex/gender" and "physical characteristics" qualifiers on booking sheets, criminal records, wanted posters, Amber Alerts... the applications for new police candidates, corrections officer and all other government employees associated with law enforcement not to mention those arrested for offenses/crimes and those imprisoned after having been tried and convicted for their crimes.
Let's eliminate all of that! In the liberal mindset that's the nexus for "profiling"!
No more mugshots (they depict race, gender, scars, marks, tatoos, oddities and preferences). Make it a rule that fingerprints can only be retained for comparison to the specific crime that the subject was incarcerated for and only compared to his/her fingerprints. Don't allow the fingerprints to be shared with other agencies, other law enforcement entities. The very sharing of that information would constitute "profiling". Sharing a criminal profile of a suspect with another agency IS profiling!
Absolutely eliminate all DNA testing. It's too defining, too absolute, too exact and ensures profiling in the nth degree. DNA testing is designed to specifically identify a "potential" suspect by their very DNA PROFILE!!!
It's PROFILING!!!
It also saves lives, prevents criminal activity and protects the innocent.
In short, eliminate law enforcement altogether. Let everyone tend to our own needs, individually. Take away all guns from reasonable, responsible, legitimate gun owners and let the criminal element run its course.
Heck, take away ALL weapons. Anything that can be used in an assault. Anything that can be used to damage, injure, maim, kill, destroy. Anything that can be used to intimidate... coerce. Take it all away.
Now that's the preferred liberal approach.
I for one won't play that "game". If those things happen I will become the criminal because I will break those laws.
That given, I know I have and I will continue to keep me and mine safe at all costs. How about you?
IMHO
Sunday, July 23, 2017
Reconquista... the "Mexicans" want Southwest USA back.
58% of "Mexicans" believe the Southwest United States of America belongs to Mexico. They don't believe they have to ask for our country's permission to cross the border and wander aimlessly through our country. In short they want utopia for them, nothing for the rest of us. It is not a reciprocal option from their points of view.
The reconquista poll from 24ahead.com
What the "Mexicans" fail to realize is that they're not the indigenous group in Mexico either. They're as much or more of a mixed breed than most Americans are. Sooo, given their logic they wouldn't need passports or visas to enter Spain, Portugal, England, France, etc. either. I mean, after all many of them are "mixed" breeds with those folks as well.
Bottom line? If they can cross without visas, permission then so can we. But frankly I'd rather leave it the way it is. Get a visa, a passport... do it legally when you enter the United States of America. That includes New Mexico, Arizona, California, Texas and all points north, south, east and west.
I no longer have a desire to leave this mighty fine United States of America for pleasure OR for business. So, I won't be affected.
But I can understand why they want to come here...
IMHO
The reconquista poll from 24ahead.com
What the "Mexicans" fail to realize is that they're not the indigenous group in Mexico either. They're as much or more of a mixed breed than most Americans are. Sooo, given their logic they wouldn't need passports or visas to enter Spain, Portugal, England, France, etc. either. I mean, after all many of them are "mixed" breeds with those folks as well.
Bottom line? If they can cross without visas, permission then so can we. But frankly I'd rather leave it the way it is. Get a visa, a passport... do it legally when you enter the United States of America. That includes New Mexico, Arizona, California, Texas and all points north, south, east and west.
I no longer have a desire to leave this mighty fine United States of America for pleasure OR for business. So, I won't be affected.
But I can understand why they want to come here...
IMHO
ICE likes what it's being told.
ICE was hobbled, hog tied, cuffed and quite frankly their duties were gutted over the past eight years. Their morale was in the dumps and their performance was, well... lacking.
By design, not by fault of their own. By executive design.
Now it appears ICE has new marching orders from the Trump administration. They're no longer going to have to look the other way when our borders laws are being violated nor are they going to have to nursemaid or babysit those who are invading our country.
And ICE is okay with that...
Quite frankly, ICE loves it's new direction. Going back to the way things should have been done in the first place, until obama came along and screwed things up.
Maybe we can get some border enforcement again. I know Mexico has it, I know Canada has it... why can't we enforce ours?
Oh wait. We can now. obummer's gone and the democrats are no longer in control.
IMHO
By design, not by fault of their own. By executive design.
Now it appears ICE has new marching orders from the Trump administration. They're no longer going to have to look the other way when our borders laws are being violated nor are they going to have to nursemaid or babysit those who are invading our country.
And ICE is okay with that...
Quite frankly, ICE loves it's new direction. Going back to the way things should have been done in the first place, until obama came along and screwed things up.
Maybe we can get some border enforcement again. I know Mexico has it, I know Canada has it... why can't we enforce ours?
Oh wait. We can now. obummer's gone and the democrats are no longer in control.
IMHO
Friday, July 07, 2017
Build The Wall!
POTUS Donald J. Trump wants the wall built and wants Mexico to pay for it.
And why not?
Mexico's been sending their citizens up here for decades. Personally, I don't have a problem with that as long as those who are coming here apply for citizenship and earn their way as citizens of this country, not illegal aliens.
Those who come up here and are willing to work, those who travel to the United States with the intention of becoming a citizen are absolutely welcome. Those who are coming up here to peddle their drugs, groom and cultivate potential sex trade victims- Those who are coming here to rape, rob, pillage and plunder.... They need to be dealt with. Harshly, immediately. Prison time at least and then send the bill to their family in Mexico for what it cost to house their criminal relative in our prison. Demand the bill be "paid in full" before the prisoner is released. Ensure his or her debt to our society is paid before the individual is escorted to the border and sent home.
That's the least we could do in repayment for how our wayward citizens are treated in their country.
IMHO
And why not?
Mexico's been sending their citizens up here for decades. Personally, I don't have a problem with that as long as those who are coming here apply for citizenship and earn their way as citizens of this country, not illegal aliens.
Those who come up here and are willing to work, those who travel to the United States with the intention of becoming a citizen are absolutely welcome. Those who are coming up here to peddle their drugs, groom and cultivate potential sex trade victims- Those who are coming here to rape, rob, pillage and plunder.... They need to be dealt with. Harshly, immediately. Prison time at least and then send the bill to their family in Mexico for what it cost to house their criminal relative in our prison. Demand the bill be "paid in full" before the prisoner is released. Ensure his or her debt to our society is paid before the individual is escorted to the border and sent home.
That's the least we could do in repayment for how our wayward citizens are treated in their country.
IMHO
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)