President Trump Pardons America's Sheriff!!!!

It's a done deal. Sheriff Joe Arpaio has been pardoned. But he should never have been arrested, charged and found guilty of the crime in the first place. He was doing what all Sheriffs and Law Enforcement Officers swore under oath to do and are required to do... He was ensuring the laws of the land were being equally enforced within his jurisdiction. To not enforce the nation's immigration laws within his jurisdiction would suggest Sheriff Joe Arpaio was playing "favorites" and was selectively enforcing laws for particular classes of people. That wouldn't jibe with his oath of office, at least. He could have been charged with malfeasance (at least) if he failed to enforce those immigration laws.

Soooo I hope the heads of those who targeted America's Sheriff, Joe Arpaio will roll for their malicious prosecution of an innocent man who was compelled by oath of office and the law of the land to enforce the laws of the land.

But that's another story, another day.

Either way America's Sheriff Joe Arpaio has been pardoned!

In the meantime, check out the over the top biased headline huffington post put on their story... "Trump Pardons Former Sheriff Joe Arpaio, Who Illegally Targeted Latinos"

Note: In typical butt hurt liberal style, huffington post's wannabe "reporter" ryan j reilly doesn't address our POTUS as "President Trump" and he alludes to the illegal immigrants as well, "latinos". We have latino citizens, we have Italian citizens, we have French citizens, we have Cuban citizens... Hell, we have all kinds of makes and models of "citizens". If any of those or any other ethnic groups or nationalities are here illegally then I'd hope the immigration laws would be enforced much like they legally were enforced by America's Sheriff Joe Arpaio until that POSPOTUS obama took office. 

It looks like now that the POSPOTUS obama's gone and we have a real POTUS at the helm those laws will once again be enforced without delay.

Oh, and maybe that wall will get built too.

POTUS Donald J. Trump shouldn't have had to pardon America's Sheriff Joe Arpaio. He did and I'm thankful POTUS Donald J. Trump did pardon America's Sheriff but Arpaio's arrest should never have happened in the first place. I hope Sheriff Joe Arpaio files a civil suit against the U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton AND the federal government for false arrest, defamation, malicious prosecution, etc.

But America's Sheriff Joe Arpaio most likely won't. He's deserving of seeking and received justice, vengeance but I doubt he'll give it a go.

You're good to go Joe! Thanks for your exemplary service America's Sheriff Joe Arpaio! Thank you!

IMHO

America's Sheriff Joe Arpaio Was Found "Guilty"

He's been found guilty and will be sentenced by an ultra liberal judge in October for a misdemeanor offense. Sheriff Joe Arpaio has been and still is a true American Patriot! He deserves more than this!

The claim is Sheriff Arpaio was illegally "profiling" maggots to obtain information that afforded Sheriff Joe Arpaio and his deputies to properly enforce the laws of the land for Arizona's and our, the rest of the nation's protection.

Sheriff Joe Arpaio was doing his job! He was doing it all too well evidently. He garnered the angst of the left, the liberals and the illegals. Now he's being propped up on the stake and the liberal fools are igniting the fuels at his feet as an example for all to see.

All because he did his job and did it very well!

How'd Sheriff Joe Arpaio do his job so well? It's simple. He incorporated good, known, proven law enforcement techniques into the job knowing full well that there was a very real possibility the liberal mindset would eventually succeed him in the office he held for so long, County Sheriff.

And it did! True to form the liberals won in Arizona and now they're going to throw a true American peace keeper into the fires of liberalism.

...and they dare call Sheriff Joe a "profiler" in disgust.

After having served in several jurisdictions as a law enforcement officer (from patrol to investigations to chief), after honorably ending my military service in 1975 I'm seeing what some say are glaring "flaws" in the "old" law enforcement system that have been brought to my attention over the years by a number of liberal, moderate and even conservative citizens and non-citizens alike.
I don't agree with their assessments. Especially those relating to "profiling". It's a simple word that's so easy to distort and twist to fit the current needs of whatever interest group(s) wants to distort it to.
Us cops, we tend to "profile" almost everything. Or so I'm told. And you know what, it's a factual statement in a lot of ways. EVERYTHING we do is founded on some sort of "profile" one way or another. Recruiting, hiring, training, education, public contact/outreach, patrol, investigations, administration, corrections, interaction with the public, equipment purchases... even the judicial side of the coin. First offenders, repeat offenders, psychological reports, varied criminal penalties for offenses, etc. EVERYTHING! is profiled in one way or another.

If we realize a particular jurisdiction or an "impacted" area within a jurisdiction is experiencing an increase in (general) criminal activity or particular type of criminal activity (trends) it's not unusual for the affected police agency to increase patrols in that particular area. If there's a noted increase in certain, particular types of crimes it's not unusual for a police agency to adjust their focus to those activities, those "elements" known to be associated with those crimes and to share most, if not all of the information with other jurisdictions, depending on the circumstances of course.

Law enforcement uses statistical data and analysis of that (and other) data DAILY to identify, adjust and adapt to the existing and quite often disturbing criminal activity/elements identified and associated with the data.

From what I've experienced that's PROFILING in most liberal minds.

If law enforcement isn't supposed to "profile" then perhaps we should eliminate background checks altogether. Also, let's remove the "race" (or "nationality), "sex/gender" and "physical characteristics" qualifiers on booking sheets, criminal records, wanted posters, Amber Alerts... the applications for new police candidates, corrections officer and all other government employees associated with law enforcement not to mention those arrested for offenses/crimes and those imprisoned after having been tried and convicted for their crimes.

Let's eliminate all of that! In the liberal mindset that's the nexus for "profiling"!

No more mugshots (they depict race, gender, scars, marks, tatoos, oddities and preferences). Make it a rule that fingerprints can only be retained for comparison to the specific crime that the subject was incarcerated for and only compared to his/her fingerprints. Don't allow the fingerprints to be shared with other agencies, other law enforcement entities. The very sharing of that information would constitute "profiling". Sharing a criminal profile of a suspect with another agency IS profiling!
Absolutely eliminate all DNA testing. It's too defining, too absolute, too exact and ensures profiling in the nth degree. DNA testing is designed to specifically identify a "potential" suspect by their very DNA PROFILE!!!

It's PROFILING!!!

It also saves lives, prevents criminal activity and protects the innocent.

In short, eliminate law enforcement altogether. Let everyone tend to our own needs, individually. Take away all guns from reasonable, responsible, legitimate gun owners and let the criminal element run its course.

Heck, take away ALL weapons. Anything that can be used in an assault. Anything that can be used to damage, injure, maim, kill, destroy. Anything that can be used to intimidate... coerce. Take it all away.

Now that's the preferred liberal approach.

I for one won't play that "game". If those things happen I will become the criminal because I will break those laws.

That given, I know I have and I will continue to keep me and mine safe at all costs. How about you?

IMHO