Body Cams on Cops? A good idea?

I would have loved wearing a body cam back in the days when I worked the street! It would have mediated some angst I had with the administration. Especially when the bad guys declared I or one of my fellow deputies I was working with "abused" the bad guy and/or deprived them of their rights. But then again, that was back in the day when most folks who went to jail knew what they were doing would lead them to at least a night in jail, knew they were going to jail and fessed up to the fact that they deserved to go to jail. Back then most of those folks accepted their fate. For the most part they knew the rules and respected the rules well enough to know that if they violated those rules they were going to go to jail. Fights, they happened. Sometimes they evolved to "difficult arrests", "face plants", "leg sweeps", mace/pepper spray, nightsticks, hair holds, or worse... and if those tactics were used they were only employed when necessary. I've never had any of those folks file a lawsuit against me or any of my compadres for that matter, though I have had them threaten to sue me until they sobered up or otherwise realized their lawsuit wouldn't stand a snowball's chance in hell in court.

It's funny how this whole "body cam" thing that these folks wished for and got is backfiring in their faces . They've finally realized these body cams are providing very good evidence against them and they were instrumental in insisting that this very productive and accurate law enforcement tool was provided to the law enforcement community. I personally thank them for their contribution to ensure our law enforcement community is equipped with and trained in the use of equipment that will provide accurate, honest, timely and professionally collected law enforcement information that, in the past was rarely collected.We, the taxpayers are providing the video/audio recording equipment, the training associated with it, good, trained, experienced police officers and their protective gear to use and effectively apply it and now the good evidence that leads to acquittal or conviction to our law enforcement so we can ensure all of our constitutional rights are being fully represented, respected and protected.

If you ask me the use of these cams provide us, the taxpayers a great return on our investment!

It's a wonderful idea. Keep the cameras. Insist the officers review the footage and audio recordings of their respective "incidents" that were recorded and insist those officers use that information in any of their reports to provide a more accurate depiction of the event(s) that prompted their response and subsequently occurred during the officers response, including any arrest(s) made.

The lawyers and social activists like black lives matter, etc. want these body cams to ensure proper policing and public safety. As a citizen, I thank them for that. Many law enforcement officers wear them today as a result and as a former cop I wish I had the opportunity to wear one throughout my career as well. Let's continue to use these body cams to ensure the arrests made are necessary and proper arrests and the accuracy of the reporting process is enhanced, at least.

Let's err in favor of more accurate reporting and more effective law enforcement.


IMHO

President Trump Pardons America's Sheriff!!!!

It's a done deal. Sheriff Joe Arpaio has been pardoned. But he should never have been arrested, charged and found guilty of the crime in the first place. He was doing what all Sheriffs and Law Enforcement Officers swore under oath to do and are required to do... He was ensuring the laws of the land were being equally enforced within his jurisdiction. To not enforce the nation's immigration laws within his jurisdiction would suggest Sheriff Joe Arpaio was playing "favorites" and was selectively enforcing laws for particular classes of people. That wouldn't jibe with his oath of office, at least. He could have been charged with malfeasance (at least) if he failed to enforce those immigration laws.

Soooo I hope the heads of those who targeted America's Sheriff, Joe Arpaio will roll for their malicious prosecution of an innocent man who was compelled by oath of office and the law of the land to enforce the laws of the land.

But that's another story, another day.

Either way America's Sheriff Joe Arpaio has been pardoned!

In the meantime, check out the over the top biased headline huffington post put on their story... "Trump Pardons Former Sheriff Joe Arpaio, Who Illegally Targeted Latinos"

Note: In typical butt hurt liberal style, huffington post's wannabe "reporter" ryan j reilly doesn't address our POTUS as "President Trump" and he alludes to the illegal immigrants as well, "latinos". We have latino citizens, we have Italian citizens, we have French citizens, we have Cuban citizens... Hell, we have all kinds of makes and models of "citizens". If any of those or any other ethnic groups or nationalities are here illegally then I'd hope the immigration laws would be enforced much like they legally were enforced by America's Sheriff Joe Arpaio until that POSPOTUS obama took office. 

It looks like now that the POSPOTUS obama's gone and we have a real POTUS at the helm those laws will once again be enforced without delay.

Oh, and maybe that wall will get built too.

POTUS Donald J. Trump shouldn't have had to pardon America's Sheriff Joe Arpaio. He did and I'm thankful POTUS Donald J. Trump did pardon America's Sheriff but Arpaio's arrest should never have happened in the first place. I hope Sheriff Joe Arpaio files a civil suit against the U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton AND the federal government for false arrest, defamation, malicious prosecution, etc.

But America's Sheriff Joe Arpaio most likely won't. He's deserving of seeking and received justice, vengeance but I doubt he'll give it a go.

You're good to go Joe! Thanks for your exemplary service America's Sheriff Joe Arpaio! Thank you!

IMHO