Okay, so I'm a day late.
Here's some opinions and views from elsewhere:
Let's start with "A Letter To Mankind". A must read from the Faith Freedom movement's website. You'll have to find it on the website but it's worth the search.
Then read "When Will The Muslims Apologize?", an article posted by Patriotic Kiwi on the Islam Watch site.
Get some U.N. insight from the post "Kofi Annan. Is There Blood On His Hands?" on the Little Green Footballs weblog.
Followed by the revealing post, "It's a Clash of Civilizations, all right", found on the Jihad Watch weblog.
And finally, wrap your reading up by searching for and reading the September 23, 2005 post, "Moderate Islam: a Reductio ad Absurdum", on the Western Resistance weblog.
Sunday, October 01, 2006
Norway's quest for global freedom of speech!
According to News From Norway, Norway will no longer be bullied!The Norwegian television (VG Nett) Channel 2 will be airing those controversial caricatures of muhammad tomorrow, Monday, October 02, 2006 in a documentary entitled "Threatened to Silence".
While addressing the proposed telecast, journalist Per Christian Magnus, promoter of the documentary suggests the documentary "is a very important act in the fight for freedom of speech."
I have to agree! For what it's worth.
Magnus went on to say "I can personally vouch for the finished product, and I guarantee that only journalistic considerations has been taken into account when considering what's going to be shown and what's not."
Magnus insists the failure to show the cartoons, caricatures would only serve to censor the story behind the Muhammad cartoons- prevent the story from being told, again.
Magnus- "The reason we made Threatened to silence is to illustrate what the conflict was all about."
The Norwegian flag is already being burned by "religion of peace" practitioners.
Imagine that- a documentary discussing islamic intolerance on a global scale.
Bravo! Norway- Bravo! VG Nett!
So, it's not an American fabrication.
Friday, September 29, 2006
Oh, just blowing off some steam.
I need to establish that I’m not a Republican, Democrat, Green(whatever), Libertarian, Communist, Socialist, etc.
I’ve always voted for a PERSON who most accurately represented MY views, MY takes on the world and our fantastic country. I admit, I’m self serving when it comes to politics.
I have to say--- establish up front--- that I did not vote for George Bush when he ran against Gore. Now--- today I’m embarrassed to admit that!
I did vote for George Bush when he was “challenged” by Kerry. Holy crap that was a nightmare. Kerry was so damned condenscending--- he never seemed to remember what he said from one day to the next. He was just trying to appease those who he was speaking to at the time he was talking. Can you imagine where we’d be right now if Kerry was president? We’d be reading the Quran and learning Spanish.
In hindsight I for one appreciate George Bush’s overall plan to invade Afghanistan and subsequently Iraq. At first I was furious. I have a son who was at the time in “harms way” and I was furious that the President of this grand United States was placing him on the front lines--- hell, he was placing him in areas where there were no REAL lines yet, DIRECTLY in harms way--- well before any United States “build up” in Pakistan began that would directly support the preparation for the battles of Afghanistan and Iraq in this war on Islamic terrorism.
So now it’s time to toss out some thoughts that I’ve had for quite awhile regarding this whole discussion of Iraq and the dramatic increase of terrorist activity in Iraq.
I've read and heard angry politicians, newscasters, religious leaders and others claim that the United States has created an islamic extremist battlefield in Iraq, drawing to that country islamic terrorist from all parts of the globe--- terrorists who would not be in Iraq were it not for the battle against terrorism--- which just happens to be focused on Iraq right now.
What’s wrong with that?
What? Do we want these alleged “terrorists” (read cowards) to remain scattered throughout the world for us and our allies to root out--- to kill covertly or not at all?
Doesn’t it make better sense to attract these cowards, draw them to a common place where we can effectively kill them? Kill them on a battlefield of our choosing and their acceptance?
These cowardly bastards were drawn to Iraq with the grand notion of “JI-effing-HAD” like moths to a candle’s flame.
Hell, they played into the hands of the President and his advisors and I love it!
Although the sunni’s, shia’s and others are slaughtering each other daily they still get caught up in the overall “ji-effing-had” bullshit!
This is just the beginning of the end for their cause. They’re struggling big time right now. That dude who supposedly replaced that zarqawi dude is begging for outside help. He's wanting to pull the plug but doesn't quite know how to do it.
We’re kicking butt and they know it!
I’ve always voted for a PERSON who most accurately represented MY views, MY takes on the world and our fantastic country. I admit, I’m self serving when it comes to politics.
I have to say--- establish up front--- that I did not vote for George Bush when he ran against Gore. Now--- today I’m embarrassed to admit that!
I did vote for George Bush when he was “challenged” by Kerry. Holy crap that was a nightmare. Kerry was so damned condenscending--- he never seemed to remember what he said from one day to the next. He was just trying to appease those who he was speaking to at the time he was talking. Can you imagine where we’d be right now if Kerry was president? We’d be reading the Quran and learning Spanish.
In hindsight I for one appreciate George Bush’s overall plan to invade Afghanistan and subsequently Iraq. At first I was furious. I have a son who was at the time in “harms way” and I was furious that the President of this grand United States was placing him on the front lines--- hell, he was placing him in areas where there were no REAL lines yet, DIRECTLY in harms way--- well before any United States “build up” in Pakistan began that would directly support the preparation for the battles of Afghanistan and Iraq in this war on Islamic terrorism.
So now it’s time to toss out some thoughts that I’ve had for quite awhile regarding this whole discussion of Iraq and the dramatic increase of terrorist activity in Iraq.
I've read and heard angry politicians, newscasters, religious leaders and others claim that the United States has created an islamic extremist battlefield in Iraq, drawing to that country islamic terrorist from all parts of the globe--- terrorists who would not be in Iraq were it not for the battle against terrorism--- which just happens to be focused on Iraq right now.
What’s wrong with that?
What? Do we want these alleged “terrorists” (read cowards) to remain scattered throughout the world for us and our allies to root out--- to kill covertly or not at all?
Doesn’t it make better sense to attract these cowards, draw them to a common place where we can effectively kill them? Kill them on a battlefield of our choosing and their acceptance?
These cowardly bastards were drawn to Iraq with the grand notion of “JI-effing-HAD” like moths to a candle’s flame.
Hell, they played into the hands of the President and his advisors and I love it!
Although the sunni’s, shia’s and others are slaughtering each other daily they still get caught up in the overall “ji-effing-had” bullshit!
This is just the beginning of the end for their cause. They’re struggling big time right now. That dude who supposedly replaced that zarqawi dude is begging for outside help. He's wanting to pull the plug but doesn't quite know how to do it.
We’re kicking butt and they know it!
Thursday, September 28, 2006
Well. Thank you 7-11!
Zarqawi's battle plan! Who's friend? Who's foe?
Read it all here. Although that was in 2004.
Things have changed considerably.
Zarqawi is with many of his other pig brethren right about now- and that isn't with those virgins.
Things have changed considerably.
Zarqawi is with many of his other pig brethren right about now- and that isn't with those virgins.
40 torture victims found- Islam, the religion of peace!
It seems our Islamic friends have scattered throughout Baghdad 40 of the most recent trophies they've garnered in their sectarian bickering. All bodies of men who bear the marks of torture, their hands and feet bound.
"The bodies of 40 men, more apparent victims of sectarian death squads, have been found dumped in eastern and western Baghdad in the past 24 hours, police said. All showed signs of torture, had been shot, and had their hands and feet bound, police Lt. Thayer Mahmoud said." (The Associated Press 09/28/2006)
All this while Muqtada al Sadr's little militia is crumbling around his ears- the only good news in this whole mess.But then again, is that really good news?
Who knows.
All I know is that this was one helluva display for the "religion of peace", Islam in Iraq this week. They're killing each other in droves.
Read the watered down version of Al Bawaba's accounting of the incident.
There's far more detailed accounts out there by the AP and others.
Islam, the religion of peace my ass. They're feeding on their own!
Tuesday, September 26, 2006
Check this out!
The fat, ugly, ignorant prick is stroking the African Union now. It's great to hear Chavez is bringing more islamic culture into his little fiefdom.
After all, it is the religion of peace! Surely there is nothing to fear from these religious zealots. (point of clarification here- is the big guy's name "muhammed", "mohammed", "mahammed" or some other variation of the name? I mean, every time I read his/her name it's a different variation! Dayum! Settle on one and let us infidels know what you've settled on!)
So, given muhammed's religion of peace- that peace compelled by the sword- given his/her compulsion to ride camels- given his/her raucous behavior you'd have thought that he/her would be a bit more identifiable and all.
Either way, Chavez and the African Union appear to be hooking up with the hopes of whatever. Who knows what Chavez is hoping for!
We certainly know what the mooslims are hoping for.
The bottom line is he has invited the very devil into his house. This is going to be interesting.
Oh yeah, why is it muslim or moslem? Pick a spelling and stay with!
Damn this is distracting!
Chavez!
That little, annoying, fat Venezuelan dude is at it again.
He's the little, fat, ugly guy on the right in this Yahoo image. He's not the shorter, hooked nosed, Iranian dude on the left. Well, actually he's the one on the left in the bigger picture.
Aw hell, let's make it simple. He's the fat, ugly dude in the darker suit. The little ratty looking character we'll get to another day. Right now, he (the little Iranian dude) is a bit busy showing the Russians where he wants his nuke sites built (oh crap. That's supposed to be a secret!).
Yeah. Hugo filed a "diplomatic protest" regarding a circus sideshow performed by his foreign minister Nicolas Maduro and a couple of tagalong's when they were temporarily detained by airport authorities in New York.
It seems the thugs were complaining about airport security measures after they'd drawn attention to themselves as they approached the gate.
The security personnel- as trained, recognized the odd behaviors of these idiots as behaviors that warranted further review. They intervened and attempted to screen the entourage in the appropriate manner- as any other odd acting passengers would be screened within the United States.
You know the rest of the story.
I propose (duh!) these security folks were set up! Chavez wanted to leave his mark with the press as he departed our country. His mark is an ugly one.
But then again, that's only my take on things.
Berlin's Deutsche Oper won't go forward with "Idomeneo".
"Our ideas about openness, tolerance and freedom must be lived on the offensive. Voluntary self-limitation gives those who fight against our values a confirmation in advance that we will not stand behind them," said Mayor Klaus Wowereit.
So, the show won't go on!
At the risk of irking those from the Religion of Peace, ISLAM a slight adaptation of the 225-year-old opera, Idomeneo was pulled from the stage.
It appears the adaptation completed by Hans Neuenfels that first appeared in 2003 included King Idomeneo offering the severed heads of the Greek god of the sea, Poseidon and those of muhammad, Jesus and Buddha much to the chagrin of our Islamic brethren.
German officials, taking into account the stir that the Dutch caricatures of muhammmad caused in September of 2005 strongly suggested the show be cancelled.
Bernd Neumann, the federal government's top cultural official, said that "problems cannot be solved by keeping silent."
"When the concern over possible protests leads to self-censorship, then the democratic culture of free speech becomes endangered."
Read about it HERE and explain to us that we're not a herd of cattle being led to our slaughter.
So, the show won't go on!
At the risk of irking those from the Religion of Peace, ISLAM a slight adaptation of the 225-year-old opera, Idomeneo was pulled from the stage.
It appears the adaptation completed by Hans Neuenfels that first appeared in 2003 included King Idomeneo offering the severed heads of the Greek god of the sea, Poseidon and those of muhammad, Jesus and Buddha much to the chagrin of our Islamic brethren.
German officials, taking into account the stir that the Dutch caricatures of muhammmad caused in September of 2005 strongly suggested the show be cancelled.
Bernd Neumann, the federal government's top cultural official, said that "problems cannot be solved by keeping silent."
"When the concern over possible protests leads to self-censorship, then the democratic culture of free speech becomes endangered."
Read about it HERE and explain to us that we're not a herd of cattle being led to our slaughter.
Monday, September 25, 2006
Islamic intolerance!
I was over on the Infidel Bloggers Alliance this morning giving it a good read. I found the "Killed in a Burka" post chillingly real. The fundamental lesson- speak out against islam and you die. Intolerance- the islamic reaction to adversity. Anger- hate- death- the result of islamic intolerance!
Another good read was found further along in the blog. Here's a couple of powerfully written paragraphs posted to the Infidel Bloggers Alliance by Jai Hind (We need a "Jihad" against intolerance)-
"Muslims must realise that this attitude of “intolerance” – of believing that there is only one truth; only one way to redemption, salvation and glory is fundamentally flawed and completely incompatible with any norms of a civilised and evolved society.We are not living in the Stone Ages and the sooner Muslims realise this, the better.
When will Muslims wake up to this?…and accept that some of the very fundamental tenets of Islam are flawed? accept the need for reform…accept that there will always be people who will not agree with what they believe in – will not agree with their way of thinking and will not agree with their interpretations – but will still need to be accorded respect, given space and treated as being equally worthy in any dialogue.
Is this asking for too much?"
The question is not "is this asking for too much?". That answer's painfully obvious. We are asking for too much of the islamic community to realize certain facts of life- flaws.
The real question was asked by Jai Hind (and many others) and continues to loom like an elephant in the room- When will Muslims begin to tolerate and accept other beliefs?
So far, the answer is "NEVER"!
Another good read was found further along in the blog. Here's a couple of powerfully written paragraphs posted to the Infidel Bloggers Alliance by Jai Hind (We need a "Jihad" against intolerance)-
"Muslims must realise that this attitude of “intolerance” – of believing that there is only one truth; only one way to redemption, salvation and glory is fundamentally flawed and completely incompatible with any norms of a civilised and evolved society.We are not living in the Stone Ages and the sooner Muslims realise this, the better.
When will Muslims wake up to this?…and accept that some of the very fundamental tenets of Islam are flawed? accept the need for reform…accept that there will always be people who will not agree with what they believe in – will not agree with their way of thinking and will not agree with their interpretations – but will still need to be accorded respect, given space and treated as being equally worthy in any dialogue.
Is this asking for too much?"
The question is not "is this asking for too much?". That answer's painfully obvious. We are asking for too much of the islamic community to realize certain facts of life- flaws.
The real question was asked by Jai Hind (and many others) and continues to loom like an elephant in the room- When will Muslims begin to tolerate and accept other beliefs?
So far, the answer is "NEVER"!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
