Featured Post

A Chilling Warning...

"Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book has been rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and stree...

Total Pageviews

Showing posts with label high capacity magazines. Show all posts
Showing posts with label high capacity magazines. Show all posts

Friday, February 09, 2018

Washington State Gun Owners! TAKE NOTICE!!!

THIS IS SERIOUS!!!

Our liberal legislators are trying to restrict access to our second amendment rights. There's the new legislation that I posted on this site a couple of weeks ago that's still raising its ugly head. Only one of those pieces of proposed legislation failed to meet the committee deadline and died in committee which means the remaining five pieces are still "out there" being tweaked to ensure our rights are going to be infringed.

Thanks to the National Rifle Association's legislative team (NRA-ILA) I have the most current updates available. I'm posting them here as LEGISLATIVE UPDATES RELATING TO FIREARMS IN WASHINGTON STATE.

As you read the information and the proposed legislation note the peculiar "definitions" assigned to certain  critical elements of each proposal. I'd go into them with you but believe you should review them for yourselves then, if you want to discuss them send me a note and we can go from there. I'll post my thoughts as an update to this post as we discuss the concerns. I won't reveal anyone's identity unless they ask me to.

Here's the link for you to obtain information regarding your particular Legislative District and those legislators who represent you. It's not my favorite but it's probably the most practical to put up here for those who have never or rarely contacted their legislators.  You should be able to find the location where you live on the state map, click on that particular location and you should be led to another link where you can search for your particular legislator.

DON'T BE SHY! CONTACT THEM AND KEEP CONTACTING THEM!

These legislator folks, they work for us. You need to let them know what you individually think about the proposed legislation.

Bill links...

- HB 1134 2017-18 BANNING THE SALE OF ASSAULT WEAPONS AND LARGE CAPACITY MAGAZINES

- HB 2422 2017-18 CONCERNING HIGH CAPACITY MAGAZINES

- SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5463 CIVIL LIABILITY AND GUN LOCKS  (Note: this is a link to the bill in bill form itself. To obtain more information you'll have to follow the number through the legislative process.)

- SB 6415 2017-18 REQUIRING PERMISSION TO BRING A CONCEALED FIREARM INTO ANOTHER PERSON'S RESIDENCE OR DWELLING PLACE

- HB 2293 2017-18 RESTRICTING FIREARMS AND DANGEROUS WEAPONS IN EARLY LEARNING FACILITIES

As of this date my understanding is that each of these bills failed to meet their respective committee deadlines for review, revisions, etc. But, that doesn't mean they're wholly out of the picture... yet. So don't be fooled if your respective legislators try to suggest they're "dead and gone". Keep a wary eye on those folks who are representing us and keep inquiring about those bills that adversely affect our . Quite often a dead bill can get resurrected.

If you wish you can follow the specific bills here. It takes a bit of navigation and you have to use particular bill numbers or titles to work your way around but it's extremely informative. It's my favorite portal for reading and researching the proposed legislation. I've been using this portal for as long as it's been up. 


Either way, we need to ensure much, if not all of this legislation is defeated or at least accepted if it's in favor of our Second Amendment rights which I didn't see any that would qualify as such. From my limited reviews and subsequent determination each bill proposed was restricting our basic human rights to self defense and/or our Second Amendment rights (however slight) in one way or another.

Language like "bear arms" and "approved sealed, locked gun safe" are conflicting. Language like "harass, harassment" given the very liberal, fluid definition that was assigned to one of the bills would have been used to restrict or even revoke certain persons second amendment rights. The subsequent revocation of those rights would result in armed confiscation by police or agents of the state of all firearms in possession, owned or cared for by any citizen found in violation of the "harass, harassment" rule. That suggests this and the rest of the legislative proposals offered are down right unconstitutional.

So, stay on top of this!

IMHO
#

Friday, November 10, 2017

Feinstein And The Rest Of The Liberals WANT OUR GUNS!

But they're going to start with rifles, shotguns and handguns that have high capacity magazines, or pistol grips, or thumb holes, or collapsible or otherwise adjustable stocks, or otherwise look, smell and taste like something that will shoot a bullet, shotgun shell or anything other than a bean bag or plastic ball more than twenty feet or so... She also wants to ban magazines that hold more than ten rounds.

Okay,  exaggerated a bit on the last little bit of that paragraph but the first part is SPOT ON!

Feinstein wants our country to become Chicago, Los Angeles, California, etc. These politicos we've elected into office, they want our guns and they want them now!

Once again, Feinstein is demanding a ban on our common, semi-automatic firearms and magazines that hold over ten rounds!

Ban them all they want. If I wanted to live in California, Chicago, New York, Australia I'd have moved there by now!

End this assault on our rights! End it now! Start voting these politicos out of office one state, one politico at a time!

IMHO

Thursday, December 20, 2012

Gun Control Won't Work!

Our government’s policies are killing us!

In the wake of the senseless tragedy at Newtown, CT I noticed the typical push by the left and the main stream media to further restrict our firearms and ammunition sales, possession and ownership in this, our mighty fine country. Once again the victims of this particular massacre were unarmed innocents in a gun free zone. The shooter, a mentally disturbed individual who had every intention of doing as much or more damage than what he did was the only person in the gun free zone who had the capacity to end the assault.

And he did… when he was finally satisfied, when he turned the gun on himself. Otherwise, the shooting would’ve continued until he either ran out of ammo or targets.

If there had been any known, armed resistance inside of the school that the shooter targeted then it’s highly possible the assault would not have occurred. Even if it had my bet would be that there wouldn’t have been nearly as many innocents killed. Reasonable, prudent, law abiding, gun familiar individuals who are in the protection industry have an absolute duty to protect and serve those they’re assigned to protect and serve.

And they do just that! Protect, serve. They recognize a threat, identify the threat and neutralize the threat using whatever means necessary.

Imposing more restrictions on the purchase, possession and carry of guns, magazines and ammunition simply removes tools from the tool boxes of those of us who are responsible gun owners and shooters. Those who wish to do harm do not care if they’re violating the law, whether there’s innocents in their field of fire or not. They’re intent on doing what they’ve set out to do and they’re going to get it done regardless of who’s in their way or what the laws might restrict. They’ll enter a gun free zone and kill just to kill knowing full well they can inflict horrific damage on oh so many innocents before they’re finally brought down. In most of those situations their sole mission in the end is to kill as many people as they can, make the biggest splash they can and subsequently kill themselves or be killed. Their actions, their name forever etched in history… right, wrong or indifferent.

By imposing gun control on those of us who are law abiding citizens the government simply makes everyone bigger targets. The government becomes an enabler to those who care less about the law, those who are hell bent on destroying as many innocents as they can before they or someone else brings an end to their craziness, their insanity.

Put armed guards in our schools, malls, theaters, stadiums. Anywhere our people gather. Encourage responsible, reasonable gun ownership and carry. Conduct background checks to include psychological testing on those who wish to purchase weapons and those who already own their weapons but wish to carry them in public, require semi annual weapons qualifications. If the government truly feels the pressing need to do something, do that! Don’t restrict us who would intervene if necessary to protect and to serve those who can’t by restricting what weapons, magazines and ammunition we can possess and where we can carry them.

In short, use common sense when trying to solve this “problem”. Punish those who commit the crimes, not those who haven’t.

…and quit making targets out of innocents. Your policies have been and still are failing miserably!

The following was wholly copied from CLASHDAILY.com. Sad but true! Chicago, the home of obama, rahm emanuel and so many other corrupt local and national politicos has some of the toughest gun laws on the books. Gun control means everything to Chicago. If you live there you'd think your kids would be safe at least. But, as you can see from the information below that isn't the case!

FROM: CLASHDAILY.com 19 December, 2012

"446 school age children shot in Chicago so far this year with strongest gun laws in country – media silent

The cesspool known as Chicago probably has the toughest gun laws in the country, yet despite all the shootings, murders and bloodshed you never hear a peep about this from the corrupt state run media. In Chicago there have been 446 school age children shot in leftist utopia run by Rahm Emanuel and that produced Obama, Jesse Jackson, Louis Farrakhan, etc. 62 school aged children have actually been killed by crazed nuts in Chicago so far this year with almost two weeks to go. So why isn’t this news worthy? Is it because it would embarrass those anti second amendment nuts who brag about Chicago’s tough gun laws? Is it because most of the kids who were shot and killed were minorities? Or is it because the corrupt media doesn’t want to show Chicago in a bad light? Amazingly, no Obama crocodile tears either.

For those of you too dense to get the point of this post, it’s to make the point about gun laws. No matter how tough the gun laws are, the crazed nut jobs will find a way to get them and if they so chose, use them. No draconian law can stop this, no matter how well intentioned the law is, or if it’s just about leftists grabbing power from citizens and taking away their constitutional rights.

THE LIST OF MURDERED SCHOOL AGE CHILDREN 2012
18 YEARS OLD- 15
17 YEARS OLD- 16
16 YEARS OLD- 16
15 YEARS OLD- 6
14 YEARS OLD- 4
13 YEARS OLD- 2
12 YEARS OLD- 1
7 YEARS OLD- 1
6 YEARS OLD- 1

446 School Age Children Shot in Chicago so Far This Year

THE LIST OF SCHOOL AGE CHILDREN SHOT IN 2012
18 year old- 110
17 year old- 99
16 year old- 89
15 year old- 62
14 year old- 39
13 year old- 21
12 year old- 10
11 year old- 2
10 year old- 3
9 year old- 1
7 year old- 3
6 year old- 2
5 year old- 1
4 year old- 1
3 year old- 1
1 year old- 2"

Want More Information?! Go To: CLASHDAILY.com!

These unfortunate figures serve to show that if you take away guns from law abiding citizens, create gun free zones where absolutely no guns are allowed you give the reigns of terror, fear, power and crime to the criminals. Those criminals will do what criminals do... kill, maim, steal and destroy lives, innocence, families, property and honor.

Gun Control is not the way. Responsible gun owners are not your enemies. We're not who you should fear. Responsible gun owners aren't the problem. The problems are those politicos, those criminals, those knee-jerk fools and bleeding heart liberals who simply want control of everything, anything we do at any expense!

NOT MY GUNS!

Not today, not tomorrow... not ever!