The "March For Our Lives"... a different perspective.

We all remember the Parkland school shooting, the Sandy Hook school shooting and oh-so-many others but we remember them differently as we grieve together, differently.

The most recent Baby Boomer generation's manipulation of their own offspring, their own spawn suggests they're not about to let a crisis go to waste. Especially if that crisis has a strong political link to their once failed and now resurrected agenda... The "March For Our Lives" wasn't a march for their lives. It was a march by the left for the left to promote the left's absurd global agenda once again and it failed. Regardless, it was another opportunity by the left to seize the stage relating to an insane, misguided, evil 19 yr. old failed product of liberalism's assault on all things he despised... freedom, happiness, family, friends, unity, diversification, security, peace...

And now the globalists, those who supported the most recent whiney liberal "march"... this "March For Our Lives" are laughing at those they manipulated into participating in that event. And all the while at least one lone wolf, one victim of that assault by the insane, murderous liberal product of the Baby Boomer society of the 60's sees the sanity in the whole ordeal. He sees this march for what it is, a blatant assault on all things conservative. An assault on the National Rifle Association and all things, all people associated with it. He sees it as another blatant attempt to strip us, our republic, our fellow citizens of our right to personal protection, of our second amendment rights in particular.

Yeah, Kyle Kashuv survived the insane attack on his school that day by spending most of the day hiding in a closet. Wondering when he would hear that door open and face his killer. He survived that day much like the rest of the survivors did... thankful to be alive in the end and he sees things differently, much differently than those like that fool Hogg who are fist pumping the air at every opportunity they get to advance the global liberal agenda on our society.

Kyle Kashuv's shown the maturity that folks like David Hogg and others fail to grasp, let alone feign. Kyle Kashuv recognizes there's problems that need to be addressed and division is one of those problems. He's suggesting that this whole new view of liberal knee jerking needs to be reviewed and called out for what it truly is...

I'm guessing it most likely has something to do with maturity. The global left recognizes the impressionable, the naïve, those who are adults by age but still children mentally and they manipulate them to promote their global agenda. Kashuv refused to be manipulated. He held his ground and spoke his mind.

The left, they don't like what he has to say. Too bad. Giddoverit!

IMHO
#

Crimes, Victims, Guns, etc.

My friend Dan shared some information with me that really tends to bring everything into perspective regarding criminal activity, gun ownership, the creation of a victim rich society and correlation of crimes, victims and guns in relation to a number of "modern" nations.

The information was forwarded to him by his friend who has since retired from long, eventful law enforcement career. Local, state and federal law enforcement. Respecting his privacy, I'll leave his name out of this post. I'll also just copy and paste the post below. I won't comment... Now anyways.

Once again, thanks for sharing Dan! Here it is, enjoy!

_______________________________________________________________________________

An interesting, but long, article I found. An interesting perspective

REB Research Blog by Dr. Robert E. Buxbaum

* REBRESEARCH.COM

Crime: US vs UK and Canada

The US has a lot of guns and a lot of murders compared to England, Canada, and most of Europe. This is something Piers Morgan likes to point out to Americans who then struggle to defend the wisdom of gun ownership and the 2nd Amendment: “How do you justify 4.8 murders/year per 100,000 population when there are only 1.6/year per 100,000 in Canada, 1.2/year per 100,000 in the UK, and 1.0/year per 100,000 in Australia — countries with few murders and tough anti-gun laws?,” he asks. What Piers doesn’t mention, is that these anti-gun countries have far higher contact crime (assault) rates than the US.

The differences narrow somewhat when considering most violent crimes, but we still have far fewer than Canada and the UK. Canada has 963/year per 100,000 “most violent crimes,” while the US has 420/year per 100,000. “Most violent crimes” here are counted as: “murder and non-negligent manslaughter,” “forcible rape,” “robbery,” and “aggravated assault” (FBI values). England and Wales classify crimes somewhat differently, but have about two times the US rate, 775/year per 100,000, if “most violent crimes” are defined as: “violence against the person, with injury,” “most serious sexual crime,” and “robbery.”

It is possible that the presence of guns protects Americans from general crime while making murder more common, but it’s also possible that gun ownership is a murder deterrent too. Our murder rate is 1/5 that of Mexico, 1/4 that of Brazil, and 1/3 that of Russia; all countries with strong anti-gun laws but a violent populous. Perhaps the US (Texan) penchant for guns is what keeps Mexican gangs on their, gun-control side of the border. Then again, it’s possible that guns neither increase nor decrease murder rates, so that changing our laws would not have any major effect. Switzerland (a country with famously high gun ownership) has far fewer murders than the US and about 1/2 the rate of the UK: 0.7 murders/ year per 100,000. Japan, a country with low gun ownership has hardly any crime of any sort — not even littering. As in the zen buddhist joke, change comes from within.

Homicide rate per country:

One major theory for US violence was that drugs and poverty were the causes. Remove these by stricter anti-drug laws and government welfare, and the violent crime would go away. Sorry to say, it has not happened; worse yet, murder rates are highest in cities like Detroit where welfare is a way of life, and where a fairly high fraction of the population is in prison for drugs.

I suspect that our welfare payments have hurt Detroit as much as they’ve helped, and that Detroit’s higher living wage, has made it hard for people to find honest work. Stiff drug penalties have not helped Detroit either, and may contribute to making crimes more violent. As Thomas More pointed out in the 1500s, if you are going to prison for many years for a small crime, you’re more likely to use force to avoid risk capture. Perhaps penalties would work better if they were smaller.
Detroit 1967 to 2017: unemployment comes down, murder rate doesn't.

 

• ---

Another Anti Gun, Bloomberg failure

Or should I say SUCCESS!

It seems awhile ago the anti-gun folks enlisted Bloomberg's influence and money to prove guns can be purchased illegally online if the left is given notice ahead of time by Bloomberg's minions. But a more recent government study arrived at somewhat different results.

The government study that was the "brain child of the "Government Accountability Office (GAO) report -- “Internet Firearm Sales: ATF Enforcement Efforts and Outcomes of GAO Covert Testing” – "was commissioned by three staunchly anti-gun members of Congress. Leading the charge was Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-MD), Ranking Member of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, who was joined by Sens. Brian Schatz (D-HI) and (Pocahontas) Elizabeth Warren (D-MA)" and was designed to torpedo online gun sales in this country, at least. This study included several years of undercover "buyers" who were directed to purchase guns online simply to show our "out of control gun peddlers" will sell to anyone at any price. It also suggested much different results than those arrived at by Bloomberg's bought and paid for "study". Much different results. But then again, it goes to show when you pay out the money for information you get the results you paid for and expected if you're Michael Bloomberg, et. al.

Here's the results of the long and costly government study that was prompted by Bloomberg's study results.

In the end it revealed there was a 100.00 per cent success rate relating to the government study. The "investigation" revealed the same results each time the undercover agent "purchasers" attempted to place an order.

Check out the link, ya' gotta love it. More taxpayer money wasted on a no problem "problem".

The left, the global agenda... they need to separate us from our guns here in the United States of America at all costs. First and foremost they need to separate us from our guns before they can move ahead with their global politics. The United States of America IS the Golden Egg and everyone wants us to succumb to "global rule".

IMHO

#